Part orientation optimisation for the additive layer manufacture of metal components
- 1.4k Downloads
In a number of additive layer manufacturing processes, particularly for metals, additional support structure is required during the build process to act as scaffolding for overhanging features and to dissipate process heat. Such structures use valuable raw materials and their removal adds to post processing time. The objective of this study was to investigate whether a simple, single objective optimisation technique could be used to find the best orientation of the part, that would minimise the volume of support needed during the build. Not only reducing waste but potentially providing an effective and consistent approach for inexperienced users to orient components during manufacture. Software was developed using MatLab with an unconstrained optimisation algorithm implemented to search the different rotations of the part and identify the configuration with the least requirement for support volume. The algorithm was gradient based, and so multiple starting points were used to identify a global minimum. The efficacy of the algorithm is illustrated with three different case studies of increasing complexity. Additionally, the component of the final study was manufactured, which allowed a comparison between the algorithm’s results and the orientations chosen by experienced operatives. In two of the three case studies, the software was able to find good solutions for the support volume minimisation. For the manufactured part, only one of the results matched the orientation chosen by the operators, the other was orientated in a similar way but the difference added significantly to the required support volume. Future developments of the software would benefit from incorporating the expertise of the manufacturing operative.
KeywordsOptimisation Additive manufacture Part orientation SLM
- 2.Atzeni E, Salmi A (2015) Study on unsupported overhangs of alsi10mg parts processed by direct metal laser sintering (dmls)Google Scholar
- 3.Brackett D, Ashcroft I, Hague R (2011) Topology optimization for additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication SymposiumGoogle Scholar
- 6.Greitemeier D, Dalle Donne C, Syassen F, Eufinger J, Melz T (2015) Effect of surface roughness on fatigue performance of additive manufactured ti6al4v. Mater Sci Technol 0(0)Google Scholar
- 7.Kruth J, Mercelis P, Van Vaerenbergh J, Craeghs T (2007) Feedback control of selective laser melting. In: 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid PrototypingGoogle Scholar
- 11.Neeraj Panhalkar RP, Anandr S Increasing part accuracy in additive manufacturing processes using a k-d tree based clustered adaptive layeringGoogle Scholar
- 18.Sunday D (2012) Intersections of rays and triangles (3d). http://geomalgorithms.com/a06-_intersect-2.html
- 20.Verma A, Tyagi S, Yang K (2014) Modeling and optimization of direct metal laser sintering process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–14Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.