Advertisement

A chain link mandrel for rotary draw bending: experimental and finite element study of operation

  • Mohammad SalemEmail author
  • Mahmoud Farzin
  • Mahmoud Kadkhodaei
  • Mohsen Nakhaei
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Rotary draw bending is one of the methods used for bending of thin wall tubes. In this process, the mandrel is positioned inside the tube, and the bend die, clamp die, pressure die, and wiper die surround the tube. The bending is conducted around the bend die. Conventional mandrels are mostly ball link type whose manufacture needs high precision and cost. Links of ball link mandrels are exposed to failure in necking areas due to particular form of the links. In this paper, a new mandrel type called “chain link mandrel” is presented, manufactured, and tested. The main difference of this mandrel with conventional mandrels is in the degrees of freedom of the mandrel’s ball segments. Finite element simulation of the bending process, using proposed mandrel and ball link mandrel, has been conducted in ABAQUS software, and some parameters, including required bending moment for tube bending, tube’s ovality, the variations in tube wall’s thickness, and spring back have been measured and compared between two types of mandrels. The clearance between external surface of the mandrel and internal wall of the tube and other influential process parameters has been set equal in both simulations. The simulation results showed that the amounts of thinning in outer wall of the bend, thickening in inner wall of the bend, tube’s ovality, and spring back are equal for both of mandrels. This fact proves the proposed mandrel’s effectiveness, despite its lower cost and simplicity compared to ball link mandrels. Experimental tests are also carried out, and the findings are compared with those obtained in the finite element simulations. There is good agreement between the simulation and experimental results. Practical operation of the proposed chain link mandrel shows that it has good performance for bending thin wall tubes. This mandrel is less expensive and stronger than the conventional ball link types, and the quality of the tubes bent by using this mandrel is acceptable.

Keywords

Tube bending Rotary draw bending Chain link mandrel (CLM) Ball link mandrel (BLM) Finite element 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang J, Agarwal R (2006) Tube bending under axial force and internal pressure. J Manuf Sci Eng 128(2):598–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maier DE, Evergreen, Nelson FA, Littleton, Hofman EV, Englewood, Van Stelle R, Denver, Cwik JA (1968) Tube bending mandrel. U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roberts CH (1969) Tube bending mandrel. U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hill EW (1984) Multi-flex tube bending mandrel. U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hill EW, Maier DE, Humphrey MR (1978) Mandrel for bending tubes. U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spates HM (1965) Tube bending mandrel. U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tingley WQ, Bradley DR, Tingley WQ (2011) Apparatus and method of manufacturing a split link for use in a flexible tube-bending mandrel. U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trana K (2002) Finite element simulation of the tube hydroforming process—bending, preforming and hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 127(3):401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heng L, He Y, Mei Z, Zhichao S, Ruijie G (2007) Role of mandrel in NC precision bending process of thin-walled tube. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 47:1164–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gu RJ, Yang H, Zhan M, Li H, Li HW (2008) Research on the springback of thin-walled tube NC bending based on the numerical simulation of the whole process. Comput Mater Sci 42(4):537–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    He Y, Jing Y, Mei Z, Heng L, Yongle K (2009) 3D numerical study on wrinkling characteristics in NC bending of aluminum alloy thin-walled tubes with large diameters under multi-die constraints. Comput Mater Sci 45(4):1052–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li H, Yang H, Yan J, Zhan M (2009) Numerical study on deformation behaviors of thin-walled tube NC bending with large diameter and small bending radius. Comput Mater Sci 45(4):921–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao GY, Liu YL, Yang H, Lu CH, Gu RJ (2009) Three-dimensional finite-elements modeling and simulation of rotary-draw bending process for thin-walled rectangular tube. Mater Sci Eng A 499(1–2):257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim J, Chung K-H, Lee W, Kong J, Ryu H, Kim D, Kim C, Wenner M, Chung K (2009) Optimization of boost condition and axial feeding on tube bending and hydro-forming process considering formability and spring-back. Met Mater Int 15(5):863–876. doi: 10.1007/s12540-009-0863-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D-x E, H-h H, X-y L, R-x N (2009) Spring-back deformation in tube bending. Int J Miner Metall Mater 16(2):177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jiang ZQ, Yang H, Zhan M, Xu XD, Li GJ (2010) Coupling effects of material properties and the bending angle on the springback angle of a titanium alloy tube during numerically controlled bending. Mater Des 31(4):2001–2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al-Qureshi HA (1999) Elastic–plastic analysis of tube bending. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 39(1):87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Al-Qureshi HA, Russo A (2002) Spring-back and residual stresses in bending of thin-walled aluminium tubes. Mater Des 23(2):217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ahmadi F, Farzin M (2008) Prediction of spring back of tube induction bending process by the FE method and comparison with analytical results. Paper presented at the Metal Forming ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Farzin M, Salem M (2012) Mandrel assembly for tube bending. U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sohankar M (2007) Thin wall tubes forming analysis and the relevant technology. Isfahan University of Technology, IsfahanGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Getting started with ABAQUS (ABAQUS Inc., 2009) version 6.9Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miller GG (2003) Tube forming processes: a comprehensive guide. Society of Manufacturing EngineersGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ahmadi F, Farzin M (2008) Prediction of springback of tube induction bending process by the FE method and comparison with analytical results. Met Form 1:201–208Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Salem
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mahmoud Farzin
    • 1
  • Mahmoud Kadkhodaei
    • 1
  • Mohsen Nakhaei
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIslamic Azad UniversityNajafabadIran

Personalised recommendations