Advertisement

Impact of traditional and international logistic policies in supply chain performance

  • Liliana Avelar-Sosa
  • Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz
  • Osslan Osiris Vergara-Villegas
  • Aidé Aracely Maldonado-Macías
  • Giner Alor-Hernández
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Mexican maquiladoras (Mexican export processing plants) are focused on exportation activities, and have several processes derived from policies related to procurement and inventory that are established by each company. This paper analyzed 17 activities related to supply chain (SC) policies and grouped them into four independent latent variables: (1) traditional logistics, (2) international logistics, (3) supply, and (4) inventories. Moreover, the impact of these policies was analyzed on ten benefits and was eventually grouped into three dependent latent variables. In order to analyze the relationship among these latent variables and to generate a measurement model, a survey was conducted in 63 exportation Mexican maquiladoras located in Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua. Twelve hypotheses about the relationships among latent variables were then generated in order to determine the causal relationships. Finally, the hypotheses were integrated in a structural equation model (SEM) and tested using partial least squares technique that is integrated in WarpPLS® software. The obtained results indicated that traditional logistics policies have a direct impact on the inventory, international logistics, and supply variables. This impact allows for greater efficiency in the supply chain, better economic performance, and more satisfied customers.

Keywords

Inventory management Logistic Structural equation models Supply chain Procurement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Samstad JG, Pipkin S (2005) Bringing the firm back in: local decision making and human capital development in Mexico’s maquiladora sector. World Dev 33(5):805–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hernandez P (2004) Mexico’s maquiladora expansion during the 1990s: an environmental assessment. Ecol Econ 49(2):163–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    INEGI (2011) Mexican national statistical yearbook. National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Informatics (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maquiladoras Association AC (AMAC) (2012) http://www.slideshare.net/elperrote/juarez-amac-datos-estadisticos. 10 March 2013
  5. 5.
    Cedillo-Campos M, Sanchez C (2013) Dynamic self-assessment of supply chains performance: an emerging market approach. J Appl Res Technol 11(3):338–347Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bititci US (1995) Modeling of performance measurement systems in manufacturing enterprises. Int J Prod Econ 42(2):137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ngai EWT, Chau DCK, Chan TLA (2011) Information technology, operational, and management competencies for supply chain agility: findings from case studies. J Strategic Inf Syst 20(3):232–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beamon BM (1998) Supply chain design and analysis: models and methods. Int J Prod Econ 55(3):281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beamon BM (1999) Measuring supply chain performance. Int J Oper Prod Man 19(3):275–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gunasekaran A, Patel C, Mcgauhhey RE (2004) A framework for supply chain performance measurement. Int J Prod Econ 87:333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hall DC, Saygin C (2012) Impact of information sharing on supply chain performance. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 58(1–4):397–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aliei M, Sazvar A, Ashrafi B (2012) Assessment of information technology effects on management of supply chain based on fuzzy logic in Iran tail industries. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 63(1–4):215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ye F, Wang Z (2013) Effects of information technology alignment and information sharing on supply chain operational performance. Comput Ind Eng 65(3):370–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zeng Y, Wang L, Deng X, Cao X, Khundker N (2012) Secure collaboration in global design and supply chain environment: problem analysis and literature review. Comput Ind 63(6):545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu Q, Geng Y, Sarkis J, Lai KH (2011) Evaluating green supply chain management among Chinese manufacturers from the ecological modernization perspective. Transport Res E-Log 47(6):808–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chow WS, Madu CN, Kuei CH, Lu MH, Lin C, Tseng H (2008) Supply chain management in the US and Taiwan: an empirical study. Omega-Int J Manage S 36(5):665–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K (1995) Performance measurement system design. Int J Oper Prod Man 15(4):80–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bititci US, Mendibil K, Albores P, Martinez M (2005) Measuring and managing performance in collaborative enterprises. Int J Oper Prod Man 25(4):333–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Folan P, Browne J (2005) A review of performance measurement: towards performance management. Comput Ind 56(7):663–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lockamy IA, Mccormack K (2004) The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation. Supply Chain Manag 9(4):272–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee C, Wilhelm W (2010) On integrating theories of international economics in the strategic planning of global supply chains and facility location. Int J Prod Econ 124(1):225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Estampe D, Lamouri S, Paris JL, Brahim DS (2013) A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models. Int J Prod Econ 142(2):247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soin SS (2004) Critical success factors in supply chain management at high technology companies. PhD. Thesis. University of Southern Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Castillo-Villar KK, Smith NR, Simonton JL (2012) A model for supply chain design considering the cost of quality. Appl Math Model 36(12):5920–5935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khan M, Jaber MY, Ahmad AR (2014) An integrated supply chain model with errors in quality inspection and learning in production. Omega-Int J Manage S 42(1):16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sana SS (2011) A production-inventory model of imperfect quality products in a three-layer supply chain. Decis Support Syst 50(2):539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xia D, Chen B (2011) A comprehensive decision-making model for risk management of supply chain. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):4957–4966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yu W, Jacobs MA, Salisbury WD, Enns H (2013) The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: an organizational learning perspective. Int J Prod Econ 146(1):346–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Low C, Chen YH (2013) A model measurement system for collaborative supply chain partners. J Manuf Syst 32(1):180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blanchard D (2010) Supply chain management best practices, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chiu YSP, Chiu SW (2006) Determining the materials procurement policy based on the economic order/production models with backlogging permitted. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 30(1–2):156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sazvar Z, Mirzapour Al-e-hashem SMJ, Baboli A, Akbari Jokar MR (2014) A bi-objective stochastic programming model for a centralized green supply chain with deteriorating products. Int J Prod Econ 150:140–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hwang H, Hahn KH (2000) An optimal procurement policy for items with an inventory level-dependent demand rate and fixed lifetime. Eur J Oper Res 127(3):537–545CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Banerjee S, Sharma A (2010) Optimal procurement and pricing policies for inventory models with price and time dependent seasonal demand. Math Comput Model 51(5–6):700–714CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mikalef P, Pateli A, Batenburg R, van de Wetering R (2013) Investigating the impact of procurement alignment on supply chain management performance. Procedia Technol 9:310–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lau RSM, Xie JL, Zhao X (2008) Effects of inventory policy on supply chain performance: a simulation study of critical decision parameters. Comput Ind Eng 55(3):620–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang J, Liu X, Tu YL (2011) A capacitated production planning problem for closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 54(5–8):757–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pettersson A, Segerstedt A (2013) Measuring supply chain cost. Int J Prod Econ 143(2):357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roh J, Hong P, Min H (2014) Implementation of a responsive supply chain strategy in global complexity: the case of manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Econ 147(Part B):198–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Heikkilä J (2002) From supply to demand chain management: efficiency and customer satisfaction. J Oper Manag 20(6):747–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lukas E, Welling A (2014) Timing and economic efficiency of climate-friendly investments in supply chains. Eur J Oper Res 233(2):448–457CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mohan S, Gopalakrishnan M, Mizzi PJ (2013) Improving the efficiency of a non-profit supply chain for the food insecure. Int J Prod Econ 143(2):248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liu S, Li C, Feng Y, Rong G (2012) Network structure and logistics efficiency: a new approach to analyse supply chain system. Comput Aided Chem Eng 30:392–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    García JL, Maldonado AA, Alvarado A, Rivera DG (2014) Human critical success factors for kaizen and its impacts in industrial performance. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 70(9–12):2187–2198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Iida T (2012) Coordination of cooperative cost-reduction efforts in a supply chain partnership. Eur J Oper Res 222(2):180–190CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Likert R (1932) A technique for the measumerement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 22(140):1–55Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Power D (2005) Supply chain management integration and implementation: a literature review. Supply Chain Manag 10(4):252–263CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cirtita H, Glaser-Segura DA (2012) Measuring downstream supply chain performance. J Man Tech Manag 23(2):299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Falk H, Hogström L (2000) Key success factors for a functioning supply chain in e-commerce B2B. Master thesis. School of Business, Economics and Law. Göteborg UniversityGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tang O, Musa N (2011) Identifying risk and research advancements in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ 133(1):25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ranganathan C, Teo TSH, Dhaliwal J (2011) Web-enabled supply chain management: key antecedents and performance impacts. Int J Inform Manage 31(6):533–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhou H (2003) The role of supply chain processes and information sharing in supply chain management. Thesis. The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT (2009) Modeling and analysis of built-to-order supply chains. Eur J Oper Res 195(2):319–334CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Merschmann ULF, Thonemann UW (2011) Supply chain flexibility, uncertainty and form performance: an empirical analysis of German manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Econ 130(1):43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Whitten GD, Green KW, Zelbst PJ (2012) Triple-A supply chain performance. Int J Oper Prod Man 32(1):28–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Young RR, Esqueda P (2005) Supply chain vulnerability: considerations of the case of Latin America. Rev Latinoam Adm 34:63–77 (In Spanish)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Haytko DL, Kent JL (2007) Mexican maquiladoras: helping or hurting the US/Mexico cross-border supply chain? Int J Log Manag 18(3):347–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ramanathan U, Gunasekaran A (2014) Supply chain collaboration: impact of success in long-term partnerships. Int J Prod Econ 147(Part B):252–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT (2004) Virtual supply chain management. Prod Plan Control 15(6):584–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ribas I, Companys R (2007) A state of the art for collaborative planning in supply chain: a deterministic and uncertainty context and. IC 3(003): 91–121 (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Teller C, Kotzab H, Grant DB (2011) Improving the execution of supply chain management in organizations. Int J Prod Econ 140(2):713–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gunasekaran A, Patel C, Tirtiroglu E (2001) Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. Int J Oper Prod Man 21(1, 2):71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Schotanus F, Telgen J, De Boer L (2010) Critical success factors for managing purchasing groups. J Purch Supply Manag 16:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Blome C, Schoenherr T (2011) Supply chain risk management in financial crises: a multiple case-study approach. Int J Prod Econ 134(1):47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Babak JN, Saeid I (2012) Analyzing effective elements in agile supply chain. Manage Sci Lett 2(1):369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lu CS, Lai KH, Chen TCE (2007) Application of structural equation modeling to evaluate the intention of shippers to use internet services in linear shipping. Eur J Oper Res 180(2):845–867CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hoejmose S, Brammer S, Millington A (2012) “Green” supply chain management: the role of trust and top management in B2B and B2C markets. Ind Market Manag 41(4):609–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Dorling K, Scott J, Deakins E (2006) Determinants of successful vendor managed inventory relationships in oligopoly industries. Int J Phys Distrib 36(3):176–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Huang M, Yang M, Zhang Y, Liu B (2012) System dynamics modeling-based study of contingent sourcing under supply discruptions. Sys Eng Proc 4(2012-Part II):290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Feng Y (2012) System dynamics modeling for supply chain information sharing. Phys Proc 25(2012):1463–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Khaji M, Shafaei R (2011) A system dynamics approach for strategic partnering in supply networks. Int J Comp Integ M 24(2):106–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Meixell MJ, Gargeya VB (2005) Global supply chain design: a literature review and critique. Transport Res E-Log 41(6):531–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Su Y, Yang C (2010) A structural equation model for analyzing the impact of ERP on SCM. Expert Syst Appl 31(1):456–469CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kroes JR (2007) Outsourcing of supply chain processes: evaluating the impact of congruence between outsourcing drivers and competitive priorities on performance. Thesis. Georgia Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Green KW, Whitten D, Inman RA (2012) Aligning marketing strategies throughout the supply chain to enhance performance. Ind Market Manag 41(6):1008–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Mccormack K, Bronzo ML, Valadares MP (2008) Supply chain maturity and performance in Brazil. Supply Chain Manag 13(4):272–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Wiengarten F, Pagell M, Fynes B (2012) Supply chain environmental investments in dynamic industries: comparing investment and performance differences with static industries. Int J Prod Econ 135(2):541–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Quesada H, Gazo R (2007) Methodology for determining key internal business processes based on critical success factors. Lect Notes Comput Sci 13(1):5–20Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Perotti S, Zorzini M, Cagno E, Micheli GJL (2012) Green supply chain practices and company performance: the case of 3PLs in Italy. Int J Phys Distrib 42(7):640–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Tsai CY (2011) On delineating supply chain cash flow under collection risk. Int J Prod Econ 129(1):186–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Cruz JM (2009) The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: multicriteria decision-making approach. Decis Support Syst 48(1):224–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Kannan VR, Tan KC (2010) Supply chain integration: cluster analysis of the impact of span of integration. Supply Chain Manag 15(3):207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2009) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Giaquinta M (2009) Mathematical analysis: an introduction to functions of several variables. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Kaiser HM (2010) Mathematical programming for agricultural, environmental, and resource economics. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1991) Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Wold S, Trygg J, Berglund A, Antti H (2001) Some recent developments in PLS modeling. Chemometr Intell Lab 58(2):131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Nunnaly JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kock N (2012) WarpPLS 3.0 user manual. ScriptWarp Systems™, LaredoGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Cenfetelli R, Bassellier G (2009) Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. Mis Quart 33(4):689–708Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. Mis Quart 31(4):623–656Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (1987) Multivariate data analysis. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Kline RB (1998) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liliana Avelar-Sosa
    • 1
  • Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz
    • 1
  • Osslan Osiris Vergara-Villegas
    • 1
  • Aidé Aracely Maldonado-Macías
    • 1
  • Giner Alor-Hernández
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Engineering and TechnologyAutonomous University of Ciudad JuarezCiudad JuárezMexico
  2. 2.Division of Graduate Studies and ResearchInstituto Tecnológico de OrizabaOrizabaMexico

Personalised recommendations