Nanosecond Yb fibre laser milling of aluminium: effect of process parameters on the achievable surface finish and machining efficiency

  • E. Williams
  • E. B. BrousseauEmail author
  • A. Rees


Pulsed ytterbium-doped fibre lasers based on a master oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) architecture possess attractive characteristics over their Q-switched diode-pumped solid-state counterparts. These include a relatively low cost of ownership and a flexible operating window with respect to the pulse duration, shape and repetition rate. For micro machining applications, given this inherent large processing window available with respect to the pulse characteristics, the effect of process parameters on particular machining outcomes needs to be investigated systematically. In this context, this paper considers the effect of a number of factors on the achievable material removal rate and surface roughness when processing aluminium with such fibre laser system operating at 1,064-nm wavelength and having built-in capabilities for selecting the duration of the delivered pulses in the nanosecond regime. The process parameters under investigation in this study were the pulse duration and repetition frequency, the pulse overlap, the scanning strategy and the distance between linear machined tracks. Initial results showed that, for pulse durations comprised between 25 and 140 ns, the specific frequency at which both the highest energy and average power are delivered leads to the maximum material removal rate (MRR) achievable and to high values of surface roughness. Following this, a design of experiments was conducted for a given pulse length with the aim of identifying an optimum combination of parameters with respect to the attained surface finish while operating at the frequency resulting in the highest MRR. This optimisation study resulted in a 60-% decrease in the achieved surface roughness and also showed that the distance between machined tracks had the highest influence on the surface finish.


Nanosecond Yb fibre laser Laser milling Design of experiments 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bruening S, Hennig G, Eifel S, Gillner A (2011) Ultrafast scan techniques for 3D-μm structuring of metal surfaces with high repetitive ps-laser pulses. Phys Procedia 12(2):105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zimmer K, Braun A, Bigl F (2000) Combination of different processing methods for the fabrication of 3D polymer structures by excimer laser machining. Appl Surf Sci 154–155:601–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang XD, Michalowski A, Walter D, Sommer S, Kraus M, Liu JS, Dausinger F (2009) Laser drilling of stainless steel with nanosecond double-pulse. Optics Laser Technol 41(2):148–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee S, Yang D, Nikumb S (2008) Femtosecond laser micromilling of Si wafers. Appl Surf Sci 254(10):2996–3005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gabzdyl J (2008) Materials processing: fibre lasers make their mark. Nat Photonics 2:21–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petkov PV, Dimov SS, Minev RM, Pham DT (2008) Laser milling: pulse duration effects on surface integrity. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 222:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yasa E, Kruth J-P (2010) Investigation of laser and process parameters for selective laser erosion. Precis Eng 34(1):101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gounaris E, Casioppo D, Denney P (2010) Mixed mode ablation used for improvements in laser machining. Proceedings of the 29th International Congress on Applications of Lasers & Electro-optics (ICALEO2010), California, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Voisey KT, Kudesia SS, Rodden WSO, Hand DP, Jones JDC, Clyne TW (2003) Melt ejection during laser drilling of metals. Mater Sci Eng A 356(1–2):414–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deladurantaye P, Gay D, Cournoyer A, Roy V, Labranche B, Levesque M, Taillon Y (2009) Material micromachining using a pulse fiber laser platform with fine temporal pulse shaping capability. Proceedings of SPIE, 7195, article id. 71951S, 12 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herfurth H, Patwa R, Lauterborn T, Heinemann S, Pantsar H (2007) Micromachining with tailored nanosecond pulses. Proceedings of SPIE, 6796, article id. 67961G, 8 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu YH, Hu JD, Zhao L, Guo ZX, Chumakov AN, Bosak NA (2010) Accumulation morphology on the surface of stainless steel irradiated by a nanosecond Nd:YAG pulsed laser. Optics Laser Technol 42(4):647–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leone C, Genna S, Caprino G, De Iorio I (2010) AISI 304 stainless steel marking by a Q-switched diode pumped Nd:YAG laser. J Mater Process Technol 210(10):1297–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bartolo P, Vasco J, Silva B, Galo C (2006) Laser micromachining for mould manufacturing: I. The influence of operating parameters. Assem Autom 26(3):227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Selada A, Manaia A, Vieira MT, Pouzada AS (2011) Effect of LBM and large-area EBM finishing on micro-injection moulding surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(1–4):171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Campanelli SL, Ludovico AD, Bonserio C, Cavalluzzi P, Cinquepalmi M (2007) Experimental analysis of the laser milling process parameters. J Mater Process Technol 191(1–3):220–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roy R (2010) A primer on the Taguchi method. 2nd edition, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardiff School of EngineeringCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  2. 2.College of EngineeringSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations