Advertisement

Development of mathematical model with a genetic algorithm for automatic GMA welding process

  • D. T. Thao
  • I. S. Kim
  • H. H. Na
  • S. M. Jung
  • J. Y. Shim
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Gas metal arc (GMA) welding process has widely been employed due to the wide range of applications, cheap consumables, and easy handling. In order to achieve a high level of welding performance and quality, a suitable model is required to investigate the characteristics of the effects of process parameters on the bead geometry in the GMA welding process. This paper is to represent new algorithms to predict process parameters on top-bead width in robotic GMA welding process. The models have been developed, linear, curvilinear, and intelligent model, based on full factorial design with two replications. Regression analysis was employed for optimization of the coefficients of linear and curvilinear models, while genetic algorithm (GA) was utilized to estimate the coefficients of an intelligent model. Not only the fitting of these models was checked and compared by using a variance test (analysis of variance (ANOVA)) but also the prediction on top-bead width using the developed models was carried out based on the additional experiments. The developed models were employed to investigate the characteristic between process parameters and top-bead width. Resulting solutions and graphical representation showed that the intelligent model developed can be employed for prediction of bead geometry in GMA welding process.

Keywords

Top-bead width Genetic algorithm Multiple regression Robotic arc welding GMA welding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Datta S, Sundar M, Bandyopadhyay A, Pal PK, Roy SC, Nandi G (2006) Statistical modeling for predicting bead volume of submerged arc butt welds. Australas Weld J 51, Second quarterGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gunaraj V, Murugan N (2000) Prediction and optimization of weld bead volume for the submerged arc process—part 1. Weld J 286–294, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gunaraj V, Murugan N (2000) Prediction and optimization of weld bead volume for the submerged arc process—part 2. Weld J 331–338 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gunaraj V, Murugan N (1999) Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes. J Mater Process Technol 88(1–3):266–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee JI, Um KW (2000) A prediction of welding process parameters by prediction of back-bead geometry. J Mater Process Technol 108(1):106–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nagesh DS, Datta GL (2002) Prediction of weld bead geometry and penetration in shielded metal-arc welding using artificial neural networks. J Mater Process Technol 123(2):303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Correia DS, Gonçalves CV, Sebastião, Junior SC, Ferraresi VA, GMAW welding optimization using genetic algorithms, presented at COBEF 2003 – II Brazilian Manufacturing Congress 18–21, May, (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canyurt OE (2005) Estimation of welded joint strength using genetic algorithm approach. Int J Mech Sci 47(8):1249–1261CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Correia DS, Gonçalves CV, da Cunha SS Jr, Ferraresi VA (2005) Comparison between genetic algorithms and response surface methodology in GMAW welding optimization. J Mater Process Technol 160(1):70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meran C (2006) Prediction of the optimized welding parameters for the joined brass plates using genetic algorithm. Mater Des 27(5):356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nagesh DS, Datta GL (2010) Genetic algorithm for optimization of welding variables for height to width ratio and application of AAN prediction of bead geometry for TIG welding process. Appl Soft Comput 10:879–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Srimath N, Murugan N (2012) Development of mathematical models for prediction of weld bead geometry in cladding mild steel valve seat rings by PTAW. Procedia Eng 38:15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sreeraj J, Kannan T (2012) Modeling and prediction of stainless steel clad bead geometry deposited by GMAW using regression and artificial neural network models. Adv Mech EngGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bansal Rajkumar G, Murugan N (2012) Prediction of weld bead geometry using artificial neural network on 2205 duplex stainless steel. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 78: (1)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vasantha Kumar V, Murugan N (2012) Effect of FCAW process parameters on weld bead geometry in stainless steel cladding. J Miner Mat Charact Eng 10(9):827–842Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    SPSS for Windows. Release 12.0.1 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Genetic Algorithm Toolbox for MATLAB, v1.2, Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering of The University of Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Montgomery C (1991) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, SingaporeMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Automatrix Inc.: Image analysis user’s manual, Rail, Macrail, AI, USA, (1990)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    User’s Guide, Genetic Algorithm Toolbox for MATLAB, v1.2, Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering of The University of Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    De Jong KA, Sarma J (1993) Generation gaps revisited. In: Algorithms 2, L. D. Whitley (ed) Foundations of genetic. Morgan Kaufmann PublishersGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. T. Thao
    • 1
  • I. S. Kim
    • 1
  • H. H. Na
    • 1
  • S. M. Jung
    • 1
  • J. Y. Shim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMokpo National UniversityMuan-gunSouth Korea
  2. 2.Environmentally Materials & Components CenterKITECHJeonju CitySouth Korea

Personalised recommendations