Advertisement

Force-field instability in surface grinding

  • Marco LeonesioEmail author
  • Paolo Parenti
  • Alberto Cassinari
  • Giacomo Bianchi
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

In this paper, a particular kind of non-regenerative instability in surface grinding is studied. Clear evidences have been collected suggesting that vibrations can occur suddenly even during the first grinding pass, just after wheel dressing. These circumstances exclude workpiece and wheel surface regeneration as instability origin, whereas both surfaces have to be considered initially smooth. On these bases, the stability of the dynamic system constituted by an oscillating ideal wheel (namely without waviness on the surface) immerged in a positional and velocity-dependent process force field has been studied, demonstrating that, under particular conditions, the force field generates an unstable behaviour. The instability occurrence is strictly related to the oscillation direction of the wheel centre, according to the mode shape associated to the dominant resonance, with respect to the direction of the grinding force (identified by the ratio between its tangential and normal components). The analysis leads to the identification of a simple necessary condition for instability occurrence. The analytical results are confirmed by time-domain grinding simulations and compared with experimental evidences.

Keywords

Surface grinding Chatter Machine dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Thompson RA (1971) The dynamic behavior of surface grinding Part 1—a mathematical treatment of surface grinding. J Eng Ind 93(2):485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thompson RA (1971) The dynamic behaviour of surface grinding Part 2—some surface grinding tests. J Eng Ind 93(2):492–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Inasaki I, Karpuschewski B, Lee H (2001) "Grinding chatter—origin and suppression". CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2(2):515–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hesterman D, Stone B (2002) Improved model of chatter in grinding, including torsional effects. Proc Inst Mech Eng K J Multi-body Dyn 216(2):169–180Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inasaki I, Yonetsu S (1969) "Forced vibrations during surface grinding". Bull JSME 12(50):385–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Inasaki I, Yonetsu S (1968) "Surface waves generated on the grinding wheel". Bull JSME 11(47):922–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li H, Shin YC (2006) "A time-domain dynamic model for chatter prediction of cylindrical plunge grinding". J Manuf Sci Eng ASME 128(3):404–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li H, Shin YC (2007) A study on chatter boundaries of cylindrical plunge grinding with process condition-dependent dynamics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(10):1563–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leonesio M, Parenti P, Cassinari A, Bianchi G, Monno M (2012) “A time-domain surface grinding model for dynamic simulation”, 3rd CIRP Conference on Process Machine Interactions (3rd PMI), Procedia CIRP, vol 4. Nagoya, Japan, pp 166–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiercigroch M, Krivtsov AM (2001) Frictional chatter in orthogonal metal cutting. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 359:713–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu DW, Liu CR (1985) “An analytical model of cutting tool dynamics—Part 1: model building, Part 2: verication”. J Eng Ind Trans ASME 107:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davies MA, Burns TJ (2001) Thermomechanical oscillations in material flow during high-speed machining. Philos Trans R Soc 359:821–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gradisek J (2001) Chatter onset in non-regenerative cutting: a numerical study. J Sound Vib 242(5):829–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stanescu ND (2009) “Chaos in grinding process”, Wseas Trans Appl Theor Mech 4(4):195–204Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marinescu ID, Hitchiner M, Uhlmann E, Rowe BW, Inasaki I (2007) Handbook of machining with grinding wheels. CRC Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Inasaki I (2008) "Performance enhancement of grinding processes-mutual interaction between the material removal process and the machine tool". JTEKT Eng J (1004E):3–8Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Snoeys R, Brown D (1969) "Dominating parameters in grinding wheel—workpiece regenerative chatter", Advances in machine tool design and research. Proceedings of the 10th International M.T.D.R. Conference, University of Manchester, pp 001–024Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramos JC, Vinolas J, Nieto FJ (2001) A simplified methodology to determine the cutting stiffness and the contact stiffness in the plunge grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(1):33–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Norgia M, Annoni M, Pesatori A, Svelto C (2010) Dedicated optical instruments for ultrasonic welder inspection and control. Measurement 43(1):39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Leonesio
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paolo Parenti
    • 2
  • Alberto Cassinari
    • 1
  • Giacomo Bianchi
    • 1
  1. 1.CNR—Institute of Industrial Technology and AutomationMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations