3D Printing multifunctionality: structures with electronics

  • David EspalinEmail author
  • Danny W. Muse
  • Eric MacDonald
  • Ryan B. Wicker


While NASA explores the power of 3D printing in the development of the next generation space exploration vehicle, a CubeSat Trailblazer was launched in November 2013 that integrated 3D-printed structures with embedded electronics. Space provides a harsh environment necessary to demonstrate the durability of 3D-printed devices with radiation, extreme thermal cycling, and low pressure—all assaulting the structure at the atomic to macroscales. Consequently, devices that are operational in orbit can be relied upon in many terrestrial environments—including many defense and biomedical applications. The 3D-printed CubeSat module (a subsystem occupying approximately 10 % of the total volume offered by the 10 × 10 × 10-cm CubeSat enclosure) has a substrate that fits specifically into the available volume—exploiting 3D printing to provide volumetric efficiency. Based on the best fabrication technology at the time for 3D-printed electronics, stereolithography (SL), a vat photopolymerization technology, was used to fabricate the dielectric structure, while conductive inks were dispensed in channels to provide the electrical interconnect between components. In spite of the structure passing qualification—including temperature cycling, shock and vibration, and outgas testing—the photocurable materials used in SL do not provide the level of durability required for long-term functionality. Moreover, the conductive inks with low-temperature curing capabilities as required by the SL substrate material are widely known to provide suboptimal performance in terms of conductivity. To address these challenges in future 3D-printed electronics, a next generation machine is under development and being referred to as the multi3D system, which denotes the use of multiple technologies to produce 3D, multi-material, multifunctional devices. Based on an extrusion process necessary to replace photocurable polymers with thermoplastics, a material extrusion system based on fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology has been developed that integrates other technologies to compensate for FDM’s deficiencies in surface finish, minimum dimensional feature size, and porosity. Additionally, to minimize the use of conductive inks, a novel thermal embedding technology submerges copper wires into the thermoplastic dielectric structures during FDM process interruptions—providing high performance, robust interconnect, and ground planes—and serendipitously improving the mechanical properties of the structure. This paper compares and contrasts stereolithography used for 3D-printed electronics with the FDM-based system through experimental results and demonstrates an automated FDM-based process for producing features not achievable with FDM alone. In addition to the possibility of using direct write for electronic circuitry, the novel fabrication uses thermoplastics and copper wires that offer a substantial improvement in terms of performance and durability of 3D-printed electronics.


Additive manufacturing 3D Structural electronics Satellites 3D Printing Embedded components Embedded wires Conductive inks Ultrasonic embedding Laser microwelding 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lopes AJ, MacDonald E, Wicker RB (2012) Integrating stereolithography and direct print technologies for 3D structural electronics fabrication. Rapid Prototyp J 18:129–143. doi: 10.1108/13552541211212113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Palmer JA, Jokiel B, Nordquist CD, Kast BA, Atwood CJ, Grant E, Livingston FJ, Medina F, Wicker RB (2006) Mesoscale RF relay enabled by integrated rapid manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 12:148–155. doi: 10.1108/13552540610670726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wicker R.B, Medina F, Elkins CJ (2004) “Multiple material micro-fabrication: extending stereolithography to tissue engineering and other novel applications,” 15th Annual Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Texas at Austin, August 2–4, 2004, pages 754–764Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wicker RB, MacDonald EW (2012) Multi-material, multi-technology stereolithography. Virtual Phys Prototyp 7:181–194. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2012.721119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gutierrez C, Salas R, Hernandez G, Muse D, Olivas R, MacDonald E, Irwin MD, Wicker RB, Church K, Newton M, Zufelt B (2011) CubeSat fabrication through additive manufacturing and micro-dispensing. Proceedings from the International Microelectronics Assembly and Packaging Society SymposiumGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castillo S, Muse D, Medina F, MacDonald E, Wicker R (2009) Electronics integration in conformal substrates fabricated with additive layered manufacturing. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. pp 730–737Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wicker RB, Medina F, MacDonald E, Muse DW, Espalin D (2013a) Methods and systems for embedding filaments in 3D structures, structural components, and structural electronic, electromagnetic and electromechanical components/devices. Patent PendingGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wicker RB, Medina F, MacDonald E, Muse DW, Espalin D (2013b) Methods and systems for connecting inter-layer conductors and components in 3D structures, structural components, and structural electronic electromagnetic and electromechanical components/devices. Patent PendingGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lyke JC (2012) Plug-and-play satellites. IEEE Spectr 49:36–42. doi: 10.1109/MSPEC.2012.6247560 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tröger C, Bens AT, Bermes G et al (2008) Ageing of acrylate-based resins for stereolithography: thermal and humidity ageing behaviour studies. Rapid Prototyp J 14:305–317. doi: 10.1108/13552540810907983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kruth J-P, Leu MC, Nakagawa T (1998) Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 47:525–540. doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kataria A, Rosen DW (2001) Building around inserts: methods for fabricating complex devices in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J 7:253–262. doi: 10.1108/13552540110410459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weiss L, Prinz F (1998) Novel applications and implementations of shape deposition manufacturing. Naval Research Reviews, Office of Naval Research 1Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cham J, Pruitt B, Cutkosky M, Binnard M, Weiss L, Neplotnik G (1999) Layered manufacturing with embedded components: process planning considerations. Proceedings of DETC99: 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palmer JA, Yang P, Davis DW, Chavez BD, Gallegos PL, Wicker RB, Medina F (2004) Rapid prototyping of high density circuitry. Proceedings of the Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing 2004 ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Medina F, Lopes AJ, Inamdar AV, Hennessey R, Palmer JA, Chavez BD, Wicker RB (2005a) Integrating multiple rapid manufacturing technologies for developing advanced customized functional devices. Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing 2005 Conference Proceedings 10–12Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Medina F, Lopes AJ, Inamdar AV, Hennessey R, Palmer JA, Chavez BD, Davis D, Gallegos P, Wicker RB (2005b) Hybrid manufacturing: integrating stereolithography and direct write technologies. 16th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. pp. 39–49Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lopes AJ, Navarrete M, Medina F, Palmer J, MacDonald E, Wicker RB (2006) Expanding rapid prototyping for electronic systems integration of arbitrary form. 17th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication SymposiumGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Palmer JA, Davis DW, Gallegos PL, Yang P, Chavez BD, Medina F, Wicker RB (2005) Stereolithography: a basis for integrated meso manufacturing. 16th Annual Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. pp. 476–483Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malone E, Lipson H (2006) Freeform fabrication of ionomeric polymer-metal composite actuators. Rapid Prototyp J 12:244–253. doi: 10.1108/13552540610707004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malone E, Berry M, Lipson H (2008) Freeform fabrication and characterization of Zn-air batteries. Rapid Prototyp J 14:128–140. doi: 10.1108/13552540810877987 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Periard D, Malone E, Lipson H (2007) Printing embedded circuits. 18th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. pp. 503–512Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Navarrete M, Lopes A, Acuna J, Estrada R, MacDonald E, Palmer J, Wicker R (2007) Integrated layered manufacturing of a novel wireless motion sensor system with GPS. 18th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. pp. 575–585Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ram GDJ, Robinson C, Yang Y, Stucker BE (2007) Use of ultrasonic consolidation for fabrication of multi-material structures. Rapid Prototyp J 13:226–235. doi: 10.1108/13552540710776179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DeGrange J, Macy B (2012) Smart parts: Additive manufacturing for integrated electro-mechanical devices [webinar]. Retrieved from Webinars/Smart-Parts.aspx
  26. 26.
    Paulsen JA, Renn M, Christenson K, Plourde R (2012) Printing conformal electronics on 3D structures with Aerosol Jet technology. Future of Instrumentation International Workshop (FIIW), 2012. pp 1–4Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chrisey DB, Piqué A (2002) Direct-write technologies for rapid prototyping applications: sensors, electronics, and integrated power sources. Academic, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Piqué A, Mathews SA, Pratap B et al (2006) Embedding electronic circuits by laser direct-write. Microelectron Eng 83:2527–2533. doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2006.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    DARPA DSO (2010) (accessed 28 May 2010)
  30. 30.
    Kim D, Moon J (2005) Highly conductive ink jet printed films of nanosilver particles for printable electronics. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 8:J30–J33. doi: 10.1149/1.2073670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jagt JC (1998) Reliability of electrically conductive adhesive joints for surface mount applications: a summary of the state of the art. IEEE Transact Components Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part A 21:215–225. doi: 10.1109/95.705467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Greer JR, Street RA (2007) Thermal cure effects on electrical performance of nanoparticle silver inks. Acta Mater 55:6345–6349. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Park BK, Kim D, Jeong S et al (2007) Direct writing of copper conductive patterns by ink-jet printing. Thin Solid Films 515:7706–7711. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.11.142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    De Nava E, Muse D, Castillo S, Alawneh M, Navarrete M, Lopes AJ, MacDonald E, Wicker RB (2008) Three-dimensional off-axis component placement and routing with solid freeform fabrication. Proceedings from the 19th Annual Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. Austin, TX, pp 362–369Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Olivas R, Salas R, Muse D, MacDonald E, Wicker R (2010) Structural electronics through additive manufacturing and micro-dispensing” International Microelectronics Assembly and Packaging Society Nationals ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mireles J (2013) Development of a fused deposition modeling system for low melting temperature metal alloys. J Electron Packag 135:011008. doi: 10.1115/1.4007160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Auyeung CY, Kim H, Mathew SA, Pique A (2007) Laser direct-write of metallic nanoparticle inks. J Laser Micro-Nanoeng (JLMN) 2007:21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schroder KA, McCool SC, Furlan WF (2006) Broadcast photonic curing of metallic nanoparticle films. Technical Proceedings of the 2006 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show. pp. 198–201Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kief C J, Zufelt BK, Christensen JH, Mee JK (2011) Trailblazer: proof of concept CubeSat Mission for SPA-1. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Infotech. pp. 1–7Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (2013) Outgassing data for selecting spacecraft materials. Retrieved from
  41. 41.
    CubeSat Design Specification Rev. 12 (2010) California State Polytechnic University. Retrieved 2010-10-16Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Steinhögl W, Schindler G, Steinlesberger G, Engelhardt M (2002) Size-dependent resistivity of metallic wires in the mesoscopic range. Phys Rev B 66:075414. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.075414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Salam B, Lai WL, Albert LCW, Keng LB (2011) Low temperature processing of copper conductive ink for printed electronics applications. Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC), 2011 I.E. 13th. pp 251–255Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lee B, Kim Y, Yang S, Jeong I, Moon J (2009) A low-cure-temperature copper nano ink for highly conductive printed electrodes. Curr Appl Phys 9:e157–e160. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2009.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wohlers TT (2012) Wohlers report 2012, rapid prototyping, tooling and manufacturing: state of the industry. Annual Worldwide Progress Report, Wohlers Associates Inc., ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wu KC, Halloran JW (2005) Photopolymerization monitoring of ceramic stereolithography resins by FTIR methods. J Mater Sci 40:71–76. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-5689-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zeon, 2011. ZEONEX RS420 datasheet. aspx?returnURL=/docServer.aspx?f = MjI5NjQyNTc=
  48. 48.
    Knowles MRH, Rutterford G, Karnakis D, Ferguson A (2007) Micro-machining of metals, ceramics and polymers using nanosecond lasers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:95–102. doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-0967-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Espalin D, Ramirez J, Medina F, Wicker R (2012) Multi-material, multi-technology FDM system. 23rd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. pp. 828–835, August 2012, AustinGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Espalin D, Ramirez J, Medina F, Wicker R (2014) Multi-material, multi-technology FDM: exploring build process variations. Rapid Prototyp J 20Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Dupont, 2009. Dupont CB028 datasheet.
  52. 52.
    Dupont, 2010. Dupont CB500 datasheet.
  53. 53.
    Roberson DA, Wicker RB, MacDonald E (2012) Ohmic curing of printed silver conductive traces. J Electron Mater 41:2553–2566. doi: 10.1007/s11664-012-2140-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kapton polyimide film datasheet.
  55. 55.
  56. 56.
    Machinability Data Center (1980) Milling operations. Machining data handbook, Metcut Research Associates Inc., Ohio. pp. 2–1 – 2–233Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kibbe RR, Neely JE, Meyer RO, White WT (1982) Vertical milling machines, machine tool practices. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Top 10 design tips for injection-molded parts: complete with material options and tolerances (2013) Guttenberg Industries IncGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Boschetto A, Giordano V, Veniali F Surface roughness prediction in fused deposition modelling by neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–16. doi:  10.1007/s00170-012-4687-x
  60. 60.
    Jan J-Y, Tseng L-C (2004) Small planar monopole antenna with a shorted parasitic inverted-L wire for wireless communications in the 2.4-, 5.2-, and 5.8-GHz bands. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 52:1903–1905. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2004.831370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Espalin
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Danny W. Muse
    • 1
  • Eric MacDonald
    • 2
    • 4
  • Ryan B. Wicker
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Printed Device Concepts, IncEl PasoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  4. 4.W.M. Keck Center for 3D InnovationThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA

Personalised recommendations