Advertisement

Tooling design and microwave curing technologies for the manufacturing of fiber-reinforced polymer composites in aerospace applications

  • Yingguang Li
  • Nanya Li
  • James Gao
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The increasing demand for high-performance and quality polymer composite materials has led to international research effort on pursuing advanced tooling design and new processing technologies to satisfy the highly specialized requirements of composite components used in the aerospace industry. This paper reports the problems in the fabrication of advanced composite materials identified through literature survey, and an investigation carried out by the authors about the composite manufacturing status in China’s aerospace industry. Current tooling design technologies use tooling materials which cannot match the thermal expansion coefficient of composite parts, and hardly consider the calibration of tooling surface. Current autoclave curing technologies cannot ensure high accuracy of large composite materials because of the wide range of temperature gradients and long curing cycles. It has been identified that microwave curing has the potential to solve those problems. The proposed technologies for the manufacturing of fiber-reinforced polymer composite materials include the design of tooling using anisotropy composite materials with characteristics for compensating part deformation during forming process, and vacuum-pressure microwave curing technology. Those technologies are mainly for ensuring the high accuracy of anisotropic composite parts in aerospace applications with large size (both in length and thickness) and complex shapes. Experiments have been carried out in this on-going research project and the results have been verified with engineering applications in one of the project collaborating companies.

Keywords

Polymer composites manufacturing Anisotropic composite tooling design Vacuum-pressure microwave curing Aerospace composite materials 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Salonitis K, Pandremenos J, Paralikas J, Chryssolouris G (2010) Multifunctional materials: engineering applications and processing challenges. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49(5):803–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barbero EJ (2010) Introduction to composite materials design. CRC, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Golzar M, Poorzeinolabedin M (2010) Prototype fabrication of a composite automobile body based on integrated structure. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49(9):1037–1045. doi: 10.1007/s00170-009-2452-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris CE, Starnes JH, Shuart MJ (2002) Design and manufacturing of aerospace composite structures, state-of-the-art assessment. J aircraft 39(4):545–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Red C (2012) Composites in general aviation 2011–2020. ComposiesWorld. http://www.compositesworld.com/zones/aerospace-composites/. Accessed 25April 2012
  6. 6.
    Immarigeon J, Holt R, Koul A, Zhao L, Wallace W, Beddoes J (1995) Lightweight materials for aircraft applications. Mater charact 35(1):41–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gibson RF (2010) A review of recent research on mechanics of multifunctional composite materials and structures. Compos struct 92(12):2793–2810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marsh G (2008) Airbus takes on Boeing with composite A350 XWB. http://www.reinforcedplastics.com/view/1106/airbus-takes-on-boeing-with-composite-a350-xwb/. Accessed 17 November 2012
  9. 9.
    Aerostrategy (2009) Aerospace globalization 2.0. http://www.aerostrategy.com/. Accessed 12 May 2012
  10. 10.
    Roger C, Chad JRO, David Y (2011) China’s advancing aerospace industry. Rand Corporation, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lv J (2009) Composite Material Application in C919 Program. International forum on composite material applications for large commercial transport aircraft, Shanghai, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bowen C, Butler R, Jervis R, Kim H, Salo A (2007) Morphing and shape control using unsymmetrical composites. J intell mat syst struct 18(1):89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stewart R (2010) New mould technologies and tooling materials promise advances for composites. Reinf Plast 54(3):30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thostenson ET, Chou TW (2001) Microwave and conventional curing of thick-section thermoset composite laminates: experiment and simulation. Polym compos 22(2):197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shanyi D (2007) Advanced composite materials and aerospace engineering. Acta Mater Compos Sin 24(1):1–12Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwartz MM (1997) Composite materials. Volume 2: Processing, fabrication, and applications. New Jersey, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ye L, Lu Y, Su Z, Meng G (2005) Functionalized composite structures for new generation airframes: a review. Compos sci technol 65(9):1436–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fan YQ, Zhang LH (2009) New development of extra large composite aircraft components application technology. Advance of Aircraft Manufacture Technology. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 30(3):534–543Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Black S (2011) Tooling for composites evolutionary trajectory. ComposiesWorld. http://www.compositesworld.com/articles/tooling-for-composites-evolutionary-trajectory. Accessed 12 May 2012
  20. 20.
    Oliveira RD, Lavanchy S, Chatton R, Costantini D, Michaud V, Salathé R, Månson JAE (2008) Experimental investigation of the effect of the mould thermal expansion on the development of internal stresses during carbon fibre composite processing. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 39(7):1083–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa. 2008.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vangerko H (1988) Composite tooling for composite components. Composites 19(6):481–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kenney E, Fletcher D, Malone R, Wilson B (2004) Invar tooling. PatentGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wimpenny DI, Gibbons GJ (2000) Metal spray Invar tooling for composites. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol Int J 72(5):430–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wimpenny DI, Gibbons GJ (2003) Metal spray tooling for composite forming. J Mater Process Technol 138(1–3):443–448. doi: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00114-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Process Fab Inc (2012) http://www.processfab.com/spv-43.aspx. Accessed 6 August 2012
  26. 26.
    Richardson M (2011) ACG launches new autoclave tooling prepreg system. http://www.aero-mag.com/news/20111/723/. Accessed 14 August 2013
  27. 27.
    John W (2010) Composite materials handbook #2. Wolfgang Publications Inc, StillwaterGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhou R (2008) Exploiture and application of advanced mould in producing composite. Fiber Reinforced Plast/Compos 39(7):209–225Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ao LH (2003) Manufacturing technology of high-precision CFRP antenna model. In: The Electronic 10th Institute of Ministry of Information Industry, Chengdu, China, 2003Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Alirand L (2008) Conclusive preliminary test for hexTOOL. JEC compos 39:108–109Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marsh G (2006) GKN Aerospace extends composites boundaries. http://www.aerospace.gknplc.com. Accessed 4 May 2012
  32. 32.
    Potter K, Campbell M, Langer C, Wisnom M (2005) The generation of geometrical deformations due to tool/part interaction in the manufacture of composite components. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 36(2):301–308Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jung WK, Chu WS, Ahn SH, Won MS (2007) Measurement and compensation of spring-back of a hybrid composite beam. J compos mater 41(7):851–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zeng X, Raghavan J (2010) Role of tool–part interaction in process-induced warpage of autoclave-manufactured composite structures. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 41(9):1174–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Choi J, Jung S, Kim C (2004) Development of an automated design system of a CNG composite vessel using a steel liner manufactured using the DDI process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24(11):781–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Young M, Cartwright B, Paton R, Yu X, Zhang L, Mai YW (2001) Material characterization tests for finite element simulation of the diaphragm forming process. In: 4th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, 2001Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ding Y, Chiu W, Liu Х (2001) 3D finite element simulation part distortion of curved composite structures. In: 13th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM-13). Beijing, China, 2001Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liu XL, Sweeting R and Paton R (2001) An investigation into spring-in of curved composite angels. In: 33rd SAMPE Technical Conference, Seattle, USA, 2001Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sweeting R, Liu XL, Paton R (2001) Prediction of process-induced distortion of curved flanged composite laminates. In: 11th International Conference on Composite Structures (ICCS-11). Monash University, Melbourne, 2001Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hyer MW (1981) Some observations on the cured shape of thin unsymmetric laminates. J compos mater 15(2):175–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dano ML, Hyer M (2002) Snap-through of unsymmetric fiber-reinforced composite laminates. Int j solids struct 39(1):175–198CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nawab Y, Jacquemin F, Casari P, Boyard N, Sobotka V (2012) Evolution of chemical and thermal curvatures in thermoset-laminated composite plates during the fabrication process. J Compos Mater. doi: 10.1177/0021998312440130 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cadogan D, Smith T, Uhelsky F, MacKusick M (2004) Morphing inflatable wing development for compact package unmanned aerial vehicles. In: Proceeding of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference. Palm Springs, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dano ML, Jean-St-Laurent M, Fecteau A (2012) Morphing of bistable composite laminates using distributed piezoelectric actuators. Smart Mater Res 2012:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sofla A, Meguid S, Tan K, Yeo W (2010) Shape morphing of aircraft wing: status and challenges. Mater Des 31(3):1284–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mason K (2004) Anisotropic wind blade design expected to reduce wind-energy costs. http://www.Compositesworld.com/articles/anisotropic-wind-blade-design-expected-to-reduce-wind-energy-costs. Accessed 17 November 2012
  47. 47.
    Moore M, Ziaei-Rad S, Salehi H (2012) Thermal response and stability characteristics of bistable composite laminates by considering temperature dependent material properties and resin layers. Appl Compos Mater 20(1):87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Friswell MI, Inman DJ (2006) Morphing concepts for UAVs. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Unmanned Air Vehicle Systems Conference, Bristol, England, 2006Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    White R, Hahn T (1992) Process modeling of composite materials: residual stress development during cure. Part II: experimental validation. J Compos Mater 26(16):2423–2452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sarrazin H, Kim B, Ahn SH, Springer GS (1995) Effects of processing temperature and layup on springback. J compos mater 29(10):1278–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jeronimidis G, Parkyn AT (1988) Residual stresses in carbon fiber–thermoplastic matrix laminates. J Compos Mater 22(5):401–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Monaghan P, Brogan M, Oosthuizen P (1991) Heat transfer in an autoclave for processing thermoplastic composites. Compos Manuf 2(3–4):233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dufour P, Michaud D, Toure Y, Dhurjati PS (2004) A partial differential equation model predictive control strategy: application to autoclave composite processing. Comput chem eng 28(4):545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Park SY, Choi WJ, Choi HS (2010) A comparative study on the properties of GLARE laminates cured by autoclave and autoclave consolidation followed by oven postcuring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49(5):605–613CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Suong H (2009) Principles of the manufacturing of composite materials. DEStech, LancasterGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lee W, Park JB, LeClair SR, Abrams FL, Garrett PH, Servais RA (1991) Qualitative process automation for autoclave cure of composite parts. PatentsGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Raghavan J, Baillie MR (2000) Electron beam curing of polymer composites. Polym compos 21(4):619–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Janke CJ, Dorsey GF, Havens SJ, Lopata VJ (1996) Electron beam curing of epoxy resins by cationic polymerization. Mater Process Chall: Aging Syst, Afford, Alternat Appl 41:196–206Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lopata VJ, Saunders CB, Singh A, Janke CJ, Wrenn GE, Havens SJ (1999) Electron-beam-curable epoxy resins for the manufacture of high-performance composites. Radiat Phys Chem 56(4):405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhang Z, Liu Y, Huang Y, Liu L, Bao J (2002) The effect of carbon-fiber surface properties on the electron-beam curing of epoxy–resin composites. Compos sci technol 62(3):331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cook WD (1980) Factors affecting the depth of cure of UV-polymerized composites. J Dent Res 59(5):800–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ruyter IE, Øysæd H (1982) Conversion in different depths of ultraviolet and visible light activated composite materials. Acta Odontol 40(3):179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Berejka AJ, Cleland M, Galloway R, Gregoire O (2005) X-ray curing of composite materials. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 241(1):847–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Thostenson E, Chou TW (1999) Microwave processing: fundamentals and applications. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 30(9):1055–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Meredith RJ (1998) Engineers’ handbook of industrial microwave heating. Institution of Electrical Engineers, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Clark DE, Sutton WH (1996) Microwave processing of materials. Annu Rev Mater Sci 26(1):299–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    National Research Council (U.S.) Committee (1994) Microwave processing of materials. National Academy Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lee WI, Springer GS (1984) Microwave curing of composites. J Compos Mater 18(4):387–409. doi: 10.1177/002199838401800405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Fang X, Scola DA (1999) Investigation of microwave energy to cure carbon fiber reinforced phenylethynyl-terminated polyimide composites, PETI-5/IM7. J Polymer Sci, Part A: Polymer Chem 37(24):4616–4628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Boey F, Yap B (2001) Microwave curing of an epoxy–amine system: effect of curing agent on the glass-transition temperature. Polym test 20(8):837–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ku HS, Siores E (2004) Shrinkage reduction of thermoset matrix particle reinforced composites during curing using microwaves irradiation. Transact, Hong Kong Inst Eng 11(3):29–34Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zainol I, Day R, Heatley F (2003) Comparison between the thermal and microwave curing of bismaleimide resin. J appl polym sci 90(10):2764–2774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zhao H, Turner I, Yarlagadda P, Berg K (2001) Numerical modelling and optimisation of a microwave enhanced rapid prototyping. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17(12):916–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ciriscioli PR, Wang Q, Springer GS (1992) Autoclave curing-comparisons of model and test results. J compos mater 26(1):90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bogetti TA, Gillespie JW (1991) Two-dimensional cure simulation of thick thermosetting composites. J compos mater 25(3):239–273Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Hojjati M, Hoa S (1994) Curing simulation of thick thermosetting composites. Compos Manuf 5(3):159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Twardowski T, Lin S, Geil P (1993) Curing in thick composite laminates: experiment and simulation. J compos mater 27(3):216–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Thostenson ET, Chou TW (1998) Microwave-accelerated curing of thick composite laminates. In: 13th Technical Conference of the American Society for Composites, Baltimore, USA, 1998Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wei J, Hawley MC, Jow J, DeLong J (1991) Microwave processing of crossply continuous graphite fiber/epoxy composites. SAMPE J 27(1):33–39Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Qaddoumi N, Zoughi R, Carriveau G (1996) Microwave detection and depth determination of disbonds in low-permittivity and low-loss thick sandwich composites. J Res Nondestructive Eval 8(1):51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Morgan SP (1949) Effect of surface roughness on eddy current losses at microwave frequencies. J Appl Phys 20(4):352–362CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Yarlagadda PKDV, Cheok E (1999) Study on the microwave curing of adhesive joints using a temperature-controlled feedback system. J Mater Process Technol 91(1):128–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Degamber B, Fernando G (2003) Fiber optic sensors for noncontact process monitoring in a microwave environment. J appl polym sci 89(14):3868–3873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Degamber B, Fernando GF (2004) Process monitoring of a thermosetting resin using optical-fiber sensors in a microwave environment. Sens J IEEE 4(6):713–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Jeff Sloan (2011) Microwave: An alternative to the autoclave. ComposiesWorld. http://www.compositesworld.com/articles/microwave-an-alternative-to-the-autoclave. Accessed 20April 2012
  86. 86.
    Liu F, Turner I, Siores E, Groombridge P (1996) Numerical and experimental investigation of the microwave heating of polymer materials inside a ridge waveguide. J microw power electromagn energ 31(2):71–81Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ku HS, Ball JAR, Siores E, Chan P (1999) Complex permittivity of low loss thermoplastic composites using a resonant cavity method. In: 12th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM-12), Paris, France, 1999Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Zhou S, Hawley MC (2003) A study of microwave reaction rate enhancement effect in adhesive bonding of polymers and composites. Compos Struct 61(4):303–309. doi: 10.1016/s0263-8223(03)00061-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Antonio C, Deam R (2005) Comparison of linear and non-linear sweep rate regimes in variable frequency microwave technique for uniform heating in materials processing. J Mater Process Technol 169(2):234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Ku HS, Siu F, Siores E, Ball JAR (2003) Variable frequency microwave (VFM) processing facilities and application in processing thermoplastic matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 139(1):291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Ku HS, Siu F, Siores E, Ball JAR, Blicblau AS (2001) Applications of fixed and variable frequency microwave (VFM) facilities in polymeric materials processing and joining. J Mater Process Technol 113(1):184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Bill BY, Geisler, Adams B, Ahmad I (2011) Variable frequency microwave curing. SolidState Technology. http://www.electroiq.com/articles/ap/print/volume-11/issue-4/features/variable-frequency-microwave- curing .html. Accessed 16 August 2012
  93. 93.
    Boey F, Gosling I, Lye S (1992) High-pressure microwave curing process for an epoxy-matrix/glass-fibre composite. J Mater Process Technol 29(1):311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Boey F (1995) Humidity and autoclave pressure effect on the interfacial shear strength of a microwave cured epoxy-glass fibre composite. Polym test 14(5):471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina
  2. 2.Centre for Innovative Product Development and Manufacturing, School of EngineeringUniversity of GreenwichChatham MaritimeUK

Personalised recommendations