Advertisement

The use of acoustic emission information to distinguish between dry and lubricated rolling element bearings in low-speed rotating machines

  • Seyed Ali Niknam
  • Victor Songmene
  • Y H Joe Au
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Bearings are known as the vital parts of machines, and their condition is often critical to the success of an operation or process. Presence of a film of lubricant such as grease between the bearing surfaces minimizes the friction and surface wear. Contaminated grease or lack of lubricant may lead to an ineffective bearing performance or malfunction of the machinery parts. Therefore, in order to avoid unexpected breakdowns, reliable and robust bearing condition monitoring techniques are demanded. According to previous studies, acoustic emission (AE) signals contain valuable information that can be used for bearing condition monitoring and fault detection. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of AE signal parameters to distinguish between lubricated and dry bearings under similar operating conditions. To this end, a low-speed rotating test rig is manufactured and used. Eight levels of rotational speeds and four levels of radial loads were applied to the test rig shaft end, which is connected to the testing bearing. In each test, seven time domain AE parameters were computed. The statistical tools were also used to present the dominant experimental variables on AE signal parameters. According to experimental results, it was found that four AE parameters can be used to distinguish between dry and lubricated bearings.

Keyword

Acoustic emission Rolling element bearing Condition monitoring Lubrication Signal processing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nisbet TS, Mullet G (1978) Rolling Bearings in Service: Interpretation of Types of Damage. HutchinsonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li Y, Billington S, Zhang C, Kurfess T, Danyluk S, Liang S (1999) Adaptive prognostics for rolling element bearing condition. Mech Syst Signal Process 13(1):103–113Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morhain A, Mba D (2003) Bearing defect diagnosis and acoustic emission. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 217(4):257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yoshioka T, Fujiwara T (1982) A new acoustic emission source locating system for the study of rolling contact fatigue. Wear 81:183–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bashir I, Bannister R, Probert D (1999) Release of acoustic energy during the fatiguing of a rolling-element bearing. Appl energy 62(3):97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tandon N, Choudhury A (1999) A review of vibration and acoustic measurement methods for the detection of defects in rolling element bearings. Tribol Int 32(8):469–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tandon N, Nakra B (1992) Comparison of vibration and acoustic measurement techniques for the condition monitoring of rolling element bearings. Tribol Int 25(3):205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    James Li C, Li S (1995) Acoustic emission analysis for bearing condition monitoring. Wear 185(1):67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mba D (2003) Acoustic emissions and monitoring bearing health. Tribol Trans 46(3):447–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McFadden P, Smith J (1984) Acoustic emission transducers for the vibration monitoring of bearings at low speeds. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 198(2):127–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yoshioka T, Fujiwara T (1984) Application of acoustic emission technique to detection of rolling bearing failure. Am Soc Mech Eng 14:55–76Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tandon N, Nakara B (1990) Defect detection in rolling element bearings by acoustic emission method. Acoust Emission 9(1):25–28Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matthews JR (1983) Acoustic emission. Gordon and Breach, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bansal V, Gupta B, Parkash A, Eshwar V (1990) Quality inspection of rolling element bearing using acoustic emission technique. Acoust Emission 9(2):142–146Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jamaludin N, Mba D, Bannister R (2001) Condition monitoring of slow-speed rolling element bearings using stress waves. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 215(4):245–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mba D, Bannister R, Findlay G (1999) Condition monitoring of low-speed rotating machinery using stress waves part 1. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 213(3):153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miettinen J, Andersson P (2000) Acoustic emission of rolling bearings lubricated with contaminated grease. Tribol Int 33(11):777–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Niknam SA, Au YHJ, Songmene V (2013) Proposing a new acoustic emission parameter for bearing condition monitoring in rotating machines. Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, (In press)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heng R, Nor M (1998) Statistical analysis of sound and vibration signals for monitoring rolling element bearing condition. Appl Acoust 53(1):211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim EY, Tan ACC, Yang BS, Kosse V (2007) Experimental study on condition monitoring of low speed bearings: time domain analysis. in 5th Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics, ACAM 2007. Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Al-Ghamd AM, Mba D (2006) A comparative experimental study on the use of acoustic emission and vibration analysis for bearing defect identification and estimation of defect size. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1537–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yoon DJIN, Kwon OHY, Chung MIHWA, Kim KW (1995) Early detection of damages in journal bearings by acoustic emission monitoring. J Acoust Emission 13(1–2):1–10Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Niknam SA (2008) Bearing condition monitoring using Acoustic Emission. M.Sc Thesis, Brunel University, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tonphong K (2002) Bearing Condition Monitoring using Acoustic Emission and Vibration. Ph.D. Thesis,Brunel University, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rogers L (1979) The application of vibration signature analysis and acoustic emission source location to on-line condition monitoring of antifriction bearings. Tribol Int 12(2):51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Swindlehurst W (1973) Acoustic emission-1 introduction. Nondestruct Test 6(3):152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seyed Ali Niknam
    • 1
    • 2
  • Victor Songmene
    • 2
  • Y H Joe Au
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Engineering and DesignBrunel UniversityWest LondonUK
  2. 2.Departments of Mechanical EngineeringÉcole de technologie supérieure (ÉTS)MontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations