Advertisement

Sustainable manufacturing: evaluation and modeling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing

  • Florent Le BourhisEmail author
  • Olivier Kerbrat
  • Jean-Yves Hascoet
  • Pascal Mognol
Original Article

Abstract

Cleaner production and sustainability are of crucial importance in the field of manufacturing processes where great amounts of energy and materials are being consumed. Nowadays, additive manufacturing technologies such as direct additive laser manufacturing allow us to manufacture functional products with high added value. Insofar as environmental considerations become an important issue in our society, as well as legislation regarding environment become prominent (Normalization ISO 14 044), the environmental impact of those processes have to be evaluated in order to make easier its acceptance in the industrial world. Some studies have been conducted on electric consumption of machine tools (standby consumption, in process consumption, etc.) but only a few studies take into account the whole existing environmental flows (material, fluids, electricity). This paper presents a new methodology where all flows consumed (material, fluids, electricity) are considered in the environmental impact assessment. This method coupled a global view required in a sustainable approach and an accurate evaluation of flow consumption in the machine. The methodology developed is based on a predictive model of flow consumption defined from the manufacturing path and CAD model of the part which will be produce. In order to get an accurate model of the process, each feature of the machine is modeled. The goal of this work is to integrate this model into the design loop for additive manufacturing parts.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Life cycle assessment Powder projection Direct laser additive manufacturing Environmental impact 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Le Pochat S (2005) Ecodesign integration in SMEs proposal for a know–how appropriation method for environmental product design. PhD Thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Arts et Métiers de Paris, p 279Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ADEME (2009) Carbon footprint : an indispensable tool. http://www.ademe.fr/htdocs/publications/dossier/av21/p1.htm. Accessed 10 May 2012
  3. 3.
    Vargas Hernandez N, Okudan Kremer GE, Schmidt LC, Acosta Herrera PR (2012) Development of an expert system to aid engineers in the selection of design for environment methods and tools. Expert Syst Appl 39:9543–9553. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bourell DL, Leu MC, Rosen DW (2009) Roadmap for additive manufacturing—identifying the future of freeform processing. The University of Texas at Austin, Laboratory for Freeform Fabrication, Advanced Manufacturing Center, p 32Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hague R, Tuck C (2007) ATKINS: manufacturing a low carbon footprint—zero emission enterprise feasibility study. Loughborough UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Munoz AA, Sheng P (1995) An analytical approach for determining the environmental impact of machining processes. J Mater Process Technol 53:736–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dahmus JB, Gutowski TG (2004) An environmental analysis of machining.In: ASME International mechanical engineering congress and RD & D Expo, Anaheim, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pusavec F, Krajnik P, Kopac J (2010) Transitioning to sustainable production - Part I: application on machining technologies. J Clean Prod 18:174–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pusavec F, Kramar D, Krajnik P, Kopac J (2010) Transitioning to sustainable production - Part II: evaluation of sustainable machining technologies. J Clean Prod 18:1211–1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Avram IO, Xirouchakis P (2011) Evaluating the use phase energy requirements of a machine tool system. J Clean Prod 19:699–711. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kong D, Choi S, Yasui Y, Pavanaskar S, Dornfeld D, Wright P (2011) Software-based tool path evaluation for environmental sustainability. J Manuf Sys 30:241–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2011.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luo Y, Ji Z, Leu MC, Caudill R (1999) Environmental performance analysis of solid freeform fabrication processes. Inst Electr Electron Eng:1–6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sreenivasan R, Goel A, Bourell DL (2010) Sustainability issues in laser-based additive manufacturing. Phys Procedia 5:81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mognol P, Lepicart D, Perry N (2006) Rapid prototyping: energy and environment in the spotlight. Rapid Prototyp J 12:26–34. doi: 10.1108/13552540610637246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kellens K, Yasa E, Renaldi Dewulf W, Kruth JP, Duflou JR (2011) Energy and resource efficiency of SLS/SLM processes. In solid freeform fabrication symposium proceeding. The University of Texas at Austin, USA, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baumers M, Tuck C, Hague R, Ashcroft I, Wildman R (2010) A comparative study of metallic additive manufacturing power consumption. In Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Proceeding. The University of Texas at Austin, USA, pp 278–288Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (1999) The Eco-Indicator 99 Methodology PRé Consultants B.VGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ponche R, Hascoet J-Y, Kerbrat O, Mognol P (2012) A new global approach to design for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 7:93–105. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2012.679499 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muller P, Mognol P, Hascoet J-Y (2013) Modeling and control of a direct laser powder deposition process for functionally graded materials (FGM) parts manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 213:685-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florent Le Bourhis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Olivier Kerbrat
    • 1
  • Jean-Yves Hascoet
    • 1
  • Pascal Mognol
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de Recherche en Communications et Cybernétique de NantesUMR CNRS 6597 1Nantes Cedex 3France

Personalised recommendations