Prediction of charge welds in hollow profiles extrusion by FEM simulations and experimental validation

  • Barbara Reggiani
  • Antonio Segatori
  • Lorenzo Donati
  • Luca Tomesani
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In direct extrusion of aluminum alloys, billets are discretely loaded into the press and joined by the high hydrostatic pressure field. The contamination of the billet-to-billet interface by oxides, dust, or lubricant produces a welded zone (charge weld) with reduced mechanical properties that requires profile discharge. For an efficient material scrapping, both the position of the transition zone and its extent in the profile must be accurately identified. In industrial practice, in relation to a lack of experimental and numerical studies on this specific matter, the determination of the zone to be discarded is still performed mainly by experience or labor-intensive analyses. The aim of the present study is to bridge this gap by investigating the evolution of the charge welds inside an industrial multi-profiles and determining their exact position and extension by experimental microstructural analyses coupled with comprehensive 3D FE simulations performed with the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian code HyperXtrude®. Skin and rest defects are also experimentally investigated and a numerical sensitivity study on the influence of the friction model selection is performed. Comparison between numerical and experimental results shows a good agreement both in terms of general trend and exhausting points of the charge welds. The results prove that the FE code is a reliable tool in assisting and driving the die and process design stages, not only for process optimization as reported in literature but also for the scrap length determination. Finally, a process efficiency index is defined and, for the specific case study, it is found to be increased from 82.6 %, as resulting from the actual industrial practice, to a 88.3 % as optimized by the performed coupled experimental and numerical activities.

Keywords

Extrusion Welding Charge weld Seam weld Finite element method (FEM) 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reddy M, Mazzoni L (2007) Benchmark results. In the Proc. of the International Conference on Extrusion and Benchmark. ISBN: 978-88-548-1286-4: 99–102Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Los Rios G, Mayavaram R, Reddy M (2009) Benchmark results. In the Proc. of the International Conference on Extrusion and Benchmark: 143–146Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reddy M, Mayavaram R, Seclì C (2011) Benchmark results. In the Proc. of the International Conference on Extrusion and Benchmark. ISBN: 978-88-548-4271-7: 233–238Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reggiani B, Donati L, Tomesani L (2010) Evaluation of process speed effect in aluminium extrusion by experiment and simulations. Proceedings of the TMS 2010, 139th Annual Meeting & Exhibition, February, 14–18, 2010. Washington State Convention Center, Seattle, WA. vol. 1:65–70, ISBN: 978-0-87339-749-0Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    HyperXtrude (Version 11.0) (2013) Simulation Software for Extrusion Process, Altair Engineering Inc. USA. http://www.altairhyperworks.com
  6. 6.
    Guana Y, Zhang C, Zhao G, Suna X, Lic P (2012) Design of a multihole porthole die for aluminum tube extrusion. Mater Manuf Process 27(2):147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang C, Zhao G, Chen Z, Chen H, Kou F (2012) Effect of extrusion stem speed on extrusion process for a hollow aluminum profile. Mater Sci Eng B 177(19):1691–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bastani AF, Aukrust T, Brandal S (2011) Optimisation of flow balance and isothermal extrusion of aluminium using finite-element simulations. J Mater Process Technol 211:650–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumar S, Vijay P (2007) Die design and experiments for shaped extrusion under cold and hot condition. J Mater ProcTechnol 19:375–381Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lof J, Blokhuis Y (2002) FEM simulations of the extrusion of complex thin-walled aluminium sections. J Mater Process Technol 122:344–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhuang X, Zhao Z, Xiang H, Li C (2008) Simulation of sheet metal extrusion processes with Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian method. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 18:1172–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu P, Xie S, Cheng L (2012) Die structure optimization for a large, multi-cavity aluminum profile using numerical simulation and experiments. Mater Des 36:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao H, Wang H, Wang M, Li G (2012) Simulation of extrusion process of complicated aluminium profile and die trial. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 22(7):1732–1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arif A.F.M., Sheikh A. K., Qamar S.Z., Raza M.K., Al-Fuhaid K.M. (2002) Product defects in aluminum extrusion and their impact on operational cost. The 6th Saudi Engineering Conference, KFUPM, Dhahran, Vol 5: 137–154Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parson NC, Hankin JD, Bryant AJ (1992) The metallurgical background to problems occurring during the extrusion of 6XXX alloys. Proc of the 5th ET Semin II:13–24Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akeret R (1992) Extrusion welds—quality aspects are now centre stage. Proc of the 5th ET Semin I:319–336Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lefsta M, Reiso O, Johnsen V (1992) Flow of the billet surface in aluminum extrusion. Proc of the 5th ET Semin II:503–518Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Valberg H (1988) Physical simulation of metal extrusion by means of model materials. Proc of the 4th ET Semin II:321–328Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Valberg H (2002) Extrusion welding in aluminium extrusion. Int J Mater Prod Technol 17(7):497–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bariani PF, Bruschi S, Ghiotti A (2006) Physical simulation of longitudinal welding in porthole-die extrusion. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 55(1):287–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Valberg H (2010) Understanding metal flow in aluminium extrusion by means of emptying diagrams. Int J Mater Form 3(1):391–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Donati L, Tomesani L, Minak G (2007) Characterization of seam weld quality in AA6082 extruded profiles. J Mater Process Technol 191:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nanninga N, White C, Mills O, Lukowski J (2010) Effect of specimen orientation and extrusion welds on the fatigue life of an AA6063 alloy. Int J Fatigue 32:238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Donati L, Tomesani L (2005) The effect of die design on the production and seam weld quality of extruded aluminum profiles. J Mater Process Technol 164–165:1025–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Donati L, Tomesani L (2009) Seam welds in hollow profile extrusion: process mechanics and product properties. Mater Sci Forum 604–605:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu G, Zhou J, Duszczyk J (2008) FE analysis of metal flow and weld seam formation in a porthole die during the extrusion of a magnesium alloy into a square tube and the effect of ram speed on weld strength. J Mater Process Technol 200(1–3):185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Donati L, Tomesani L (2008) Seam welds modeling and mechanical properties prediction in the extrusion of AA6082 alloy. Key Eng Mater 367:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qiang L, Harris C, Jolly MR (2003) Finite element modelling simulation of transverse welding phenomenon in aluminium extrusion process. Mater Des 24–7:493–496Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang X, Feng D, Shi X, Liu S (2013) Oxide distribution and microstructure in welding zones from porthole die extrusion. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23(3):765–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Loukus A, Subhash G, Imaninejad M (2004) Mechanical properties and microstructural characterization of extrusion welds in AA6082-T4. J Mater Sci 39:6561–6569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhu JH, Young B (2007) Effects of transverse welds on aluminum alloy columns. Thin-Walled Struct 45(3):321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bingöl S, Keskin MS (2007) Effect of different extrusion temperature and speed on extrusion welds. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 23(2):39–42Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Duplanĉić I., Prgin J. (1988) Material flow in the extrusion of hollow aluminum sections, through hollow dies. In the Proc. of 4th International Aluminum Extrusion Technology Seminar, Vol. 2, 235–240Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Saha PK (2000) Aluminum extrusion technology. ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 44073–0002Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kandis J, Valberg H (2012) Metal flow in two-hole extrusion of Al-alloys studied by FEA with experiments. Key Engineering Materials 504–506: 493-498Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Khan YA, Valberg H, Irgens I (2009) Joining of metal streams in extrusion welding. Int J Mater Form 2(1):109–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Donati L, Tomesani L, Schikorra M, Ben KN, Tekkaya AE (2010) Friction model selection in FEM simulations of aluminium extrusion. Int J Surf Sci Eng 4:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fitta I, Sheppard T (2003) Nature of friction in extrusion process and its effect on material flow. Mater Sci Technol 19:837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang C, Zhao G, Chen H, Guan Y, Kou F (2012) Numerical simulation and metal flow analysis of hot extrusion process for a complex hollow aluminum profile. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Levanov AN (1997) Improvement of metal forming processes by means of useful effects of plastic friction. J Mater Process Technol 72:314–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tomov B, Minev R, Radev R, Gagov V (2003) About input data selection for the FEM analysis of bulk forming. J Mater Process Technol 133:199–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chanda T, Zhou J, Kowalski L, Duszczyk J (1999) 3D FEM simulation of the thermal events during AA6061 aluminum extrusion. Scr Mater 41(2):195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sellars CM, Tegart WJMG (1972) Hot workability. Int Metall Rev 17(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zener C, Hollomon JH (1944) Effect of strain rate upon plastic flow of steel. J Appl Phys 15:22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Altan T, Oh S, Gegel H (1983) Metal forming. Fundamentals and applications. American Society for Metals, Metal ParkGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Altan T, Lahoti D (1975) Prediction of temperature distribution in axisymmetric compression and torsion. ASME J Eng Mater Technol 113–120Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Reggiani
    • 1
  • Antonio Segatori
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Donati
    • 1
  • Luca Tomesani
    • 1
  1. 1.DIN Department of Engineering for IndustryALMA MATER STUDIORUM—University of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations