Advertisement

Image processing-based accessibility analysis method for determining undercut-free parting direction

  • Rajnish Bassi
  • Sanjeev Bedi
Original Article

Abstract

In injection molding, demoldability of a part without the use of a side core is possible only if all of its surfaces are fully accessible in the parting direction. A mold surface may be fully accessible from some directions, but may not be accessible from other directions. Therefore, to determine the undercut-free parting direction, an algorithm is developed that evaluates the accessibility of each part surface from a set of directions (called as candidate parting directions) by using image processing techniques. In the proposed methodology, the surface accessibility is determined by comparing the projected area of each surface on the image plane in the presence of other part surfaces to that of the same surface in the absence of other part surfaces. The algorithm can be used to determine the accessibility of planar, ruled, and free-form surfaces without tessellating the part surfaces. The algorithm includes a method that can also successfully classify surfaces that are oriented perpendicular to the parting direction. The surface classification can be used to identify the undercut-free parting direction, recognize the various undercut features, and form the visibility maps. The accuracy of the algorithm depends upon the number of pixels used to represent the part on the computer screen. The method has been successfully implemented, and test results are discussed in this paper.

Keywords

Accessibility analysis Image processing Demoldability Mold undercuts 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen LL, Chou SY, Woo TC (1993) Parting directions for mold and die design. Comput Aided Des 25(12):762–768CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hui KC, Tan ST (1992) Mould design with sweep operations—a heuristic search approach. Comput Aided Des 24(2):81–91CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Woo TC (1994) Visibility maps and spherical algorithms. Comput Aided Des 26(1):6–16CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen LL, Chou SY (1995) Partial visibility for selecting a parting direction in mold and die design. J Manuf Syst 14(5):319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elber G, Cohen E (1995) Arbitrarily precise computation of Gauss maps and visibility sets for freeform surfaces. The third ACM symposium on solid modeling and applications, pp 271–279Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dhaliwal S, Gupta SK, Huang J, Priyadarshi A (2003) Algorithm for computing global accessibility cones. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 3:200–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Priyadarshi A, Gupta SK (2004) Generating algorithms for automated design of multi-piece permanent molds. Comput Aided Des 36:241–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bassi R, Reddy NV, Bedi S (2010) Automatic recognition of intersecting features for side core design in two-piece permanent molds. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:421–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khardekar R, Burton G, McMains S (2006) Finding feasible mold parting directions using graphics hardware. Comput Aided Des 38:327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Priyadarshi AK, Gupta SK (2006) Finding mold-piece regions using computer graphics hardware. Geometric modeling and processing. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4077:655–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations