Hybrid prognostic method applied to mechatronic systems

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Fault detection and isolation, or fault diagnostic, of mechatronic systems has been the subject of several interesting works. Detecting and isolating faults may be convenient for some applications where the fault does not have severe consequences on humans as well as on the environment. However, in some situations, diagnosing faults may not be sufficient and one needs to anticipate the fault. This is what is done by fault prognostics. This latter activity aims at estimating the remaining useful life of systems by using three main approaches: data-driven prognostics, model-based prognostics, and hybrid prognostics. In this paper, a hybrid prognostic method is proposed and applied on a mechatronic system. The method relies on two phases: an offline phase to build the behavior and degradation models and an online phase to assess the health state of the system and predict its remaining useful life.

Keywords

Fault detection Fault diagnostics Fault prognostics Remaining useful life Bond graph modeling 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    AFNOR (2005) Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines—prognostics—part 1: general guidelines. NF ISO 13381-1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chelidze D, Cusumano J (2004) A dynamical systems approach to failure prognosis. J Vib Acoust 126:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dong M, He D (2007) A segmental hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM)-based diagnostics and prognostics framework and methodology. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:2248–2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heng A, Tan AC, Mathew J, Montgomery N, Banjevic D, Jardine AK (2009) Intelligent condition-based prediction of machinery reliability. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(5):1600–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heng A, Zhang S, Tan AC, Mathew J (2009) Rotating machinery prognostics: state of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(3):724–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Isermann R (1997) Supervision, fault-detection and fault-diagnosis methods—an introduction. Control Eng Pract 5:639–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jardine AK, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1483–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karnopp D, Margolis D, Rosenberg R (2006) Systems dynamics: modeling and simulation of mechatronic systems, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kothamasu R, Huang SH, Verduin WH (2006) System health monitoring and prognostics—a review of current paradigms and practices. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 28:1012–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lebold M, Thurston M (2001) Open standards for condition-based maintenance and prognostic systems. In: Proceedings 5th maintenance and reliability conference (MARCON)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luo J, Pattipati KR, Qiao L, Chigusa S (2003) Model-based prognostic techniques applied to a suspension system. Trans Syst Man Cybern 38:1156–1168Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Medjaher K, Tobon-Mejia DA, Zerhouni N (2012) Remaining useful life estimation of critical components with application to bearings. IEEE Trans Reliab 61(2):292–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Merzouki R, Medjaher K, Djeziri MA, Ould-Bouamama B (2007) Backlash fault detection in mechatronic system. Mechatronics 17:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ould Bouamama B, Medjaher K, Samantaray AK, Staroswiecki M (2006) Supervision of an industrial steam generator. Part I: bond graph modelling. Control Eng Pract 14(1):71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peng Y, Dong M, Zuo MJ (2010) Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 50:297–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Samantaray AK, Ould Bouamama B (2008) Model-based process supervision: a bond graph approach. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sikorska J, Hodkiewicz M, Ma L (2011) Prognostic modelling options for remaining useful life estimation by industry. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:1803–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tobon-Mejia DA, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N (2012) CNC machine tool’s wear diagnostic and prognostic by using dynamic bayesian networks. Mech Syst Signal Process 28:167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Venkatasubramanian V (2005) Prognostic and diagnostic monitoring of complex systems for product lifecycle management: challenges and opportunities. Comput Chem Eng 29(6):1253–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Automatic Control and Micro-Mechatronic Systems DepartmentFEMTO-ST Institute, UMR CNRS 6174—UFC/ENSMM/UTBMBesançonFrance

Personalised recommendations