Advertisement

Development of fixed abrasive chemical mechanical polishing process for glass disk substrates

  • Y. B. TianEmail author
  • Z. W. Zhong
  • S. T. Lai
  • Y. J. Ang
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Glass disk substrates are used in a wide range of portable devices because of their relatively high resistance to heat and shocks compared to aluminum substrates. Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) with fixed abrasive pad is an alternative glass disk substrates finishing method to loose abrasive lapping and polishing with traditional pad. In this paper, we developed a chemical mechanical polishing process for 2.5-inch glass disk substrates using a fixed abrasive pad. A serial of CMP experiments were carried out under different polishing variables and conditioning modes (ex situ and in situ conditioning). The polishing performances were evaluated and analyzed in terms of surface roughness, surface topography, and material removal rate. The polishing characteristics were also discussed to reveal material removal mechanism and surface generation involved in fixed abrasive CMP for glass disk substrates.

Keywords

Chemical mechanical polishing Fixed abrasive polishing Material removal rate Surface roughness Glass disk substrate Hard disk driver 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Eda S (2006) Glass disk substrate for smaller hard disk drive. J Jpn Soc Abras Technol 50(1):15–18 (in Japanese)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar S, McCaffrey TR (2003) Engineering economics at a hard disk drive manufacturer. Technovation 23(9):749–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lei H, Bu N, Chen R, Hao P, Neng S, Tu X, Yuen K (2010) Chemical mechanical polishing of hard disk substrate with α-alumina-g-polystyrene sulfonic acid composite abrasive. Thin Solid Films 518(14):3792–3796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qi Z, Lee W (2010) XPS study of CMP mechanisms of NiP coating for hard disk drive substrates. Tribol Int 43(4):810–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tian YB, Ang YJ, Zhong ZW, Hu X, Tan R (2013) Chemical mechanical polishing of glass disk substrates: preliminary experimental investigation, Mater Manuf Process 28(4). doi: 10.1080/10426914.2011.654161
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Lineback R (2011) Impressive Growth Continues for Tablet Computer, Research Bulletin, IC Insights, 28 November, 2011Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin SC, Huang HC, Hong H (2005) Effects of slurry components on the surface characteristics when chemical mechanical polishing NiP/Al substrate. Thin Solid Films 483(1–2):400–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim H, Kim H, Jeong H, Seo H, Lee S (2003) Self-conditioning of encapsulated abrasive pad in chemical mechanical polishing. J Mater Process Tech 142(3):614–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kulawski M, Microelectronics VTT, Espoo LH, Henttinen K, Suni T, Weimar F, Makinen J (2005) Polishing of bulk micro-machined substrates by fixed abrasive pads for smoothing and planarization of MEMS structures, Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop, 2005 IEEE/SEMI, 11–12 April 2005. Munich, German, pp 5–10Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Douglas PG, Paul MN, Fixed abrasive article for use in modifying a semiconductor wafer, Patent No.: US 7,329,171 B2, Feb 12, 2008Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kojima H, Ito M, Takemiya S, Method of polishing glass substrates, Patent No.: US 2010/0086864 A1, Apr. 8, 2010Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhong ZW, Tian YB, Ang YJ, Wu H (2012) Optimization of the chemical mechanical polishing process for optical silicon substrates. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60(9–12):1197–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsai MY, Chen WK (2011) Effect of CMP conditioner diamond shape on pad topography and oxide wafer performances. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(1–4):253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guo Y, Lee H, Lee Y, Jeong H (2012) Effect of pad groove geometry on material removal characteristics in chemical mechanical polishing. Int J Precis Eng Man 13(2):303–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang JC, Oh DW, Kim HJ, Kim T (2010) Investigation on surface hardening of polyurethane pads during chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). J Electron Mater 39(3):338–346MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tian YB, Zhou L, Shimizu J, Tashiro Y, Kang RK (2009) Elimination of surface scratch/texture on the surface of single crystal Si substrate in chemo-mechanical grinding (CMG) process. Appl Surf Sci 255(7):4205–4211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tian YB, Zhou L, Shimizu J, Sato H, Tashiro Y, Kang RK (2009) A novel single step thinning process for extremely thin Si wafers. Adv Mat Res 76–78:434–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo DM, Tian YB, Kang RK, Zhou L, Lei MK (2009) Material removal mechanism of chemo-mechanical grinding (CMG) of Si wafer by using soft abrasive grinding wheel (SAGW). Key Eng Mat 389–390:459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou L, Kawaii S, Kimura S, Shimuzu J, Eda H (2003) Development of chemo-mechanical grinding (CMG) process, International Conference on Leading Edge Manufacturing in 21st Century, Nov.3–6, 2003, Niigata, Japan, pp315–320Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trezona RI, Allsopp DN, Hutchings IM (1999) Transition between two-body and three-body abrasive wear: influence of test conditions in the microscale abrasive wear test. Wear 225–229:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Phillips K, Crimes GM, Wilshaw TR (1977) On the mechanism of material removal by free abrasive grinding of glass and fused silica. Wear 41(2):327–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Trezona RI, Hutchings IM (1999) Three-body abrasive wear testing of soft materials. Wear 233–235:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee C, Lee H, Jeong M, Jeong H (2011) A study on the correlation between pad property and material removal rate in CMP. Int J Precis Eng Man 12(5):917–920MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Evans CJ, Paul E, Dornfeld D, Lucca D, Byrne G, Tricard M, Klocke F, Dambon O, Mullany BA (2003) Material removal mechanisms in lapping and polishing. CIRP Ann-Manuf Techn 52(2):611–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brinksmeier E, Riemer O, Gessenharter A (2006) Finishing of structured surfaces by abrasive polishing. Precis Eng 30(3):325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tsai HJ, Huang PY, Tsai HC, Chiu SJ (2011) Chemical mechanical polishing in elastic contact and partial hydrodynamic lubrication: modeling and experiments. Mater Manuf Process 26(2):319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bifano TG, Dow TA, Scattergood RO (1991) Ductile -regime grinding: a new technology for machining brittle materials. ASME J Eng Ind 113:184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. B. Tian
    • 1
    Email author
  • Z. W. Zhong
    • 2
  • S. T. Lai
    • 2
  • Y. J. Ang
    • 1
  1. 1.Singapore Institute of Manufacturing TechnologySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations