Advertisement

Adaptive rapid prototyping/manufacturing for functionally graded material-based biomedical models

  • G. Q. Jin
  • W. D. LiEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

In this paper, research on developing adaptive rapid prototyping/manufacturing (RP/M) algorithms for functionally graded material (FGM)-based biomedical models is reported. Non-uniform rational B-spline and FGM-based features have been proposed to present the models. Innovative algorithms for tool path optimization in RP/M have been developed, including: (1) a mixed tool path algorithm to generate contour/offset tool paths to represent varying material composition along the boundary of each sliced layer of a model and zigzag tool paths to present the internal area of a single material to simplify computing and processing and (2) adaptive algorithms to control the RP/M nozzle/print head to minimize the build time of each sliced layer according to the geometrical characteristics of the model. Case studies of FGM-based biomedical models have been used to verify and demonstrate the performance of the research in terms of algorithm effectiveness.

Keywords

Functionally graded material NURBS Rapid prototyping/manufacturing Tool path 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Miyamoto Y, Kaysser WA, Rabin BH, Kawasaki A, Ford RG (1999) Functionally graded materials: design, processing and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pompe W, Worch H, Epple M, Gelinsky W, Greil P, Hempel U, Scharnweber D, Schulte K (2003) Functionally graded materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng, A 362(1/2):40–60Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watari F, Yokoyama A, Omori M, Hirai T, Kondo H, Uo M, Kawasaki T (2004) Biocompatibility of materials and development to functionally graded implant for bio-medical application. Compos Sci Tech 64(6):893–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kieback B, Neubrand A, Riedel H (2003) Processing techniques for functionally graded materials. Mater Sci Eng, A 362:81–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cannillo V, Lusvarghi L, Manfredini T, Montorsi M, Siligardi C, Sola A (2007) Glass–ceramic functionally graded materials produced with different methods. J Eur Ceram Soc 27(2/3):1293–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fang Z (2005) Image-guided modeling, fabrication and micromechanical analysis of bone and heterogeneous structure. PhD dissertation, Drexel UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burstein AH, Wright TM (1994) Fundamentals of orthopedic biomechanics. Williams & Wilkins, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar S, Kruth JP (2010) Composites by rapid prototyping technology. Mater Des 31(2):850–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bartolo P, Bidanda B (2008) Bio-materials and prototyping applications in medicine, 1st edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Almeida HA, Bartolo PJS (2010) Virtual topological optimization of scaffolds for rapid prototyping. Medic Eng Phys 32(7):775–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Comesana R, Lusquinos F, Val J, Lopez-Alvarez M, Quintero F, Riveiro A, Boutinguiza M, Carlos A, Jones JR, Hill RG, Pou J (2011) Three-dimensional bioactive glass implants fabricated by rapid prototyping based on CO2 laser cladding. Acta Biomater 7:3476–3487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jackson TR, Liu H, Patrikalakis NM, Sachs EM, Cima MJ (1999) Modeling and designing functionally graded material components for fabrication with local composition control. Mater Des 20(2/3):63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu H, Maekawa T, Patrikalakis NM, Sachs EM, Cho W (2004) Methods for feature-based design of heterogeneous solids. Comput Aided Des 36(12):1141–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu H (2000) Algorithms for design and interrogation of functionally graded material solid. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nemat-Alla M (2003) Reduction of thermal stresses by developing two-dimensional functionally graded materials. Int J Solids Struct 40(26):7339–7356CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Das S, Chung H (2006) Processing and properties of glass bead particulate-filled functionally graded Nylon-11 composites produced by selective laser sintering. Mater Sci Eng, A 437(2):226–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xia Q, Wang MY (2008) Simultaneous optimization of the material properties and the topology of functionally graded structures. Comput Aided Des 40(6):660–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chiu WK, Yu KM (2008) Multi-criteria decision-making determination of material gradient for functionally graded material objects fabrication. IMechE B 222(2):293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Samanta K, Koc B (2005) Feature-based design and material blending for free-form heterogeneous object modeling. Comput Aided Des 37(3):287–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siu YK, Tan ST (2002) Source-based heterogeneous solid modeling. Comput Aided Des 34(1):41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Biswas A, Shapiro V, Tsukanov I (2004) Heterogeneous material modeling with distance fields. Comput Aided Geom Des 21(3):215–242MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Qian XP, Dutta D (2003) Physics-based modeling for heterogeneous objects. J Mech Des, Trans ASME 125(3):416–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang P, Qian XP (2007) A B-spline-based approach to heterogeneous objects design and analysis. Comput Aided Des 39(2):95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Warkhedkar RM, Bhatt AD (2009) Material-solid modeling of human body: a heterogeneous B-spline based approach. Comput Aided Des 41(8):586–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kasaeian AB, Vatan SN, Daneshmand S (2011) FGM materials and finding an appropriate model for the thermal conductivity. Procedia Eng 14:3199–3204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prakash T, Singha MK, Ganapathi M (2012) A finite element study on the large amplitude flexural vibration characteristics of FGM plates under aerodynamic load. Int J Non-Linear Mech (in press)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhu J, Ye GR, Xiang YQ, Chen WQ (2011) Recursive formulae for wave propagation analysis of FGM elastic plates via reverberation-ray matrix method. Compos Struct 93:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Torshizian MR, Kargarnovin MH, Nasirai C (2011) Mode III fracture of an arbitrary oriented crack in two dimensional functionally graded material. Mech Res Commun 38:164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kou XY, Parks GT, Tan ST (2012) Optimal design of functionally graded materials using a procedural model and particle swarm optimization. Comput Aided Des 44:300–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kou XY, Tan ST (2007) Heterogeneous object modeling: a review. Comput Aided Des 39(4):284–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhou MY (2004) Path planning of functionally graded material objects for layered manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 42(2):405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chang R, Nam J, Sun W (2008) Computer-aided design, modeling, and freeform fabrication of 3D tissue constructs for drug metabolism studies. Comput Aided Des Appl 5(1–4):363–370Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shin KH (2002) Representation and process planning for layered manufacturing of heterogeneous objects. PhD dissertation, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Choi SH, Cheung HH (2006) A topological hierarchy-based approach to toolpath planning for multi-material layered manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 38(2):143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chen KZ, Feng XY, Wang F, Feng XA (2007) A virtual manufacturing system for components made of a multiphase perfect material. Comput Aided Des 39(2):112–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gupta A, Seifalian AM, Ahmad Z, Edirisinghe MJ, Winslet MC (2007) Novel electro hydro dynamic printing of nano composite biopolymer scaffolds. J Bioact Compat Polym 22(3):265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ryan GE, Pandit AS, Apatsidis DP (2008) Porous titanium scaffolds fabricated using a rapid prototyping and powder metallurgy technique. Biomaterials 29(27):3625–3635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Watanabe Y, Iwasa Y, Sato H, Teramoto A, Abe K, Fujiwara EM (2011) Microstructures and mechanical properties of titanium/biodegradable-polymer FGM for bone tissue fabricated by spark plasma sintering method. J Mater Process Tech 211(12):1919–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ma W, But WC, He P (2004) NURBS-based adaptive slicing for efficient rapid prototyping. Comput Aided Des 36:1309–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ma YL, Hewitt WT (2003) Point inversion and projection for NURBS curve and surface: control polygon approach. Comput Aided Geom Des 20(2):79–99MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Syed I (2011) Feasibility study of key components & algorithm design for multi-material RP&M Machine. Master dissertation, Coventry UniversityGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Armillotta A (2006) Assessment of surface quality on textured FDM prototypes. Rapid Prototyp J 12(1):35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bacchewar PB, Singhai SK, Pandey PM (2007) Statistical modelling and optimization of surface roughness in the selective laser sintering process. IMechE, B 221(1):35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Open CASCADE (2012) At: http://www.opencascade.org/ Accessed 15 November 2011
  45. 45.
    Yakovlev A, Trunova E, Grevey D, Pilloz M, Smurov I (2005) Laser-assisted direct manufacturing of functionally graded 3D objects. Surf Coat Tech 190(1):15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hao L, Savalani MM, Zhang Y, Tanner KE, Harris RA (2006) Selective laser sintering of hydroxylapatite reinforced polyethylene composites for bioactive implants and tissue scaffold development. IMechE H 220(6):521–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Han W, Jafari MA, Danforth SC, Safari A (2002) Tool path-based deposition planning in fused deposition processes. J Manuf Sci Eng 124(2):462–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chua CK, Leong KF, Tan KH, Wiria FE, Cheah CM (2004) Development of tissue scaffolds using selective laser sintering of polyvinyl alcohol/hydroxyapatite biocomposite for craniofacial and joint defects. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 15(10):1113–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and ComputingCoventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations