Influence of energy induced from processing parameters on the mechanical properties of friction stir welded lap joint of aluminum to coated steel sheet

  • Hrishikesh Das
  • Sushovan Basak
  • Goutam Das
  • Tapan Kumar Pal


Friction stir welding has been attempted to evaluate joint strength of lap joint between aluminum sheet (AA6063) and zinc-coated steel (HIF-GA) sheet under different combination of rotational speed and traverse speed. The shear strength decreases significantly when rotational speed increases from 700 to 1,500 rpm at a traverse speed of 30 mm/min. At traverse speed of 50 mm/min, increasing rotational speed from 700 to 1,500 rpm, shear strength remains more or less the same. However, at a traverse speed of 100 mm/min, the shear strength increases significantly with increasing rotational speed from 700 to 1,500 rpm. Essentially, higher fracture load of the lap joint is obtained within a certain range of energy. The results have been correlated with the microstructural characteristics at the bond interface using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, electron probe micro analyzer, and X-ray diffraction. The results show that characteristics of intermetallic compound formed at the interface derived from energy input takes predominating role towards lap joint of Al and coated steel. Furthermore, force and torque responses influenced by the processing parameters can be utilized as weld quality check.


Friction stir lap welding (FSLW) High strength interstitial free steel (HIF) FSW parameters Intermetallic compound (IMC) Force Torque 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barnes TA, Pashby IR (2000) Joining techniques for aluminum space frames used in automobiles. Part I—solid and liquid phase welding. J Mater Process Technol 99(1):62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park SHC, Sato YS, Kokawa H (2001) Mechanical properties and microstructure in friction-stir-weld of magnesium alloy AZ61. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium, JWS, Kobe, pp 639–644Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maruzen (1990) Welding Handbook. Edited by Japan Welding Society, p. 496.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aritoshi M, Okita K (2002) Friction welding of dissimilar metals. J Jpn Weld Soc 71–6:432–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watanabe T, Yoneda A et al (1999) A study on ultrasonic welding of dissimilar metals. Q J Jpn Weld Soc 17(5):223–242, 1st report and 2nd reportCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elrefaey A, Gouda M, Takahashi M, Ikeuchi K (2005) Characterization of aluminum/steel lap joint by friction stir welding. J Mater Eng Perf 14:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kimapong K, Watanabe T (2005) Effect of welding process parameters on mechanical property of FSW lap joint between aluminum alloy and steel. Mater Trans 46:2211–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kimapong K, Watanabe T (2005) Lap joint of A5083 aluminum alloy and SS400 steel by friction stir welding. Mater Trans 46:835–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elrefaey A., Takahashi A. and Ikeuchi K., (2005), Preprints of the national meeting of JWS. 73, pp.66–67Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen YC, Komazaki T, Kim YG, Tsumura T, Nakata K (2007) Int. Weld Join Conf, Seoul, pp 435–36Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zimmer S, Langlois L, Laye J, Bigot R (2010) Experimental investigation of the influence of the FSW plunge processing parameters on the maximum generated force and torque. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47:201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ahmed E, Takahashi M, Ikeuchi K (2005) Friction-stir-welded lap joint of aluminum to zinc-coated steel. Q J Jpn Weld Soc 23(2):186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen YC, Nakata K (2008) Effect of the surface state of steel on the microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar metal lap joints of aluminum and steel by friction stir welding. Metall Mater Trans A 39A:1985–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ASM (1973) Metals handbook, vol. 8 Metallography, structures and phase diagram, Metals Park: ASM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pretorius R, Vredenberg AM, Saris FW (1991) Prediction of phase formation sequence and phase stability in binary metal–aluminum thin–film systems using the effective heat of formation rule. J Appl Phys 70:3636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pretorius R, de Reus R, Vredenberg AM and Saris FW (1990), Mater. Lett. 9, pp. 494.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kobayashi K., Nishimoto K., and Ikeuchi K., Zairyo Setsugo Kogaku No Kiso, (2002), Introduction to joining engineering of materials, Sampo, pp.182-188Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khandkar MZH, Khan JA, Reynolds AP (2003) Prediction of temperature distribution and thermal history during friction stir welding: input torque based model. Sci Technol Weld Join 8:165–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Santella M, Grant G, Arbegast W, Plunge testing to evaluate tool materials for friction stir welding of 6061+20wt% Al2O3 composite, (2003), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Friction Stir Welding, Part City, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hrishikesh Das
    • 1
  • Sushovan Basak
    • 1
  • Goutam Das
    • 2
  • Tapan Kumar Pal
    • 1
  1. 1.Jadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia
  2. 2.National Metallurgical LaboratoryJamshedpurIndia

Personalised recommendations