Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Problems in the implementation process of advanced manufacturing technologies

  • 666 Accesses

  • 9 Citations


The investment in advanced manufacturing technologies provides great benefits to the enterprises that manage them correctly; however, when this process is not fulfilled in a proper way, it could generate the bankruptcy of the company. That is why the implementation process is considered as a complex problem. In this paper, the results of a survey made in some industrial plants in Juarez City, Chihuahua, Mexico were discussed. In such survey, it asked about the situation related to the 26 most commented and reported problems in the literature; the questionnaire was validated using the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and factorial analysis was applied to the obtained information from a 189 cases sample size. Results indicate that the main problems that the assembly plants have to confront when they implement advanced manufacturing technologies are related with maintenance, required special installations, suppliers are far away; there is no accomplishment of the production standards; there are no economic resources, fear risk to invest; and finally custom’s problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    AMAC (2010) Maquiladoras Association of Ciudad Juarez, A.C. http://amacweb.org/INICIO/Espanol%20Inicio.html. Accessed 16 January 2011 (In Spanish)

  2. 2.

    Baldwin J, Lin Z (2002) Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers. Res Policy 31:1–18

  3. 3.

    Beaumont NB, Schroder RM (1997) Technology, manufacturing performance and business performance amongst Australian manufacturers. Technovation 17:297–307

  4. 4.

    Canada J, Sullivan WG (1990) Persistent pitfalls and applicable approaches for justification of advanced manufacturing systems. Eng Cost Prod Econ 18:241–253

  5. 5.

    Chuu SJ (2009) Selecting the advanced manufacturing technology using fuzzy multiple attributes group decision making with multiple fuzzy information. Comput Ind Eng 57:1033–1042

  6. 6.

    Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334

  7. 7.

    De Troya-M M, Blázquez N, Rivas F, Fernández I, Rupérez A, Pons J, Perea E (2009) Validation of a questionnaire in Spanish on behaviors, attitudes and knowledge related to sun exposure: questionnaire on the beach. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas 100:586–595 (In Spanish)

  8. 8.

    Dangayach GS, Deshmukh SG (2006) An exploratory study of manufacturing strategy practices of machinery manufacturing companies in India. Omega 34:254–273

  9. 9.

    Denneberg D, Grabisch M (2004) Measure and integral with purely ordinal scales. J Math Psychol 48:15–22

  10. 10.

    Efstathiades A, Tassou SA, Oxinos G, Antoniou A (2000) Advanced manufacturing technology transfer and implementation in developing countries: the case of the Cypriot manufacturing industry. Technovation 20:93–102

  11. 11.

    Efstathiades A, Tassou S, Antoniou A (2002) Strategic planning, transfer and implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMT). Development of an integrated process plan. Technovation 22:201–212

  12. 12.

    INEGI (2010) National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Informatics. http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/mexicocifras/default.aspx?ent=08. Accessed 12 September 2011

  13. 13.

    Hynek J, Janeček V (2006) Advanced Manufacturing Technology Projects Justification, University of Hradec Králové. Faculty of Informatics and Management Project no. 402/07/1495

  14. 14.

    Kakati M (1997) Strategic evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology. Int J Prod Econ 53:141–156

  15. 15.

    Karsak EE, Tolga E (2001) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system investments. Int J Prod Econ 69:49–64

  16. 16.

    Kotha S, Swamidass PM (2000) Strategy, advanced manufacturing technology and performance: empirical evidence from U.S. manufacturing firms. J Oper Manag 18:257–277

  17. 17.

    Laosirihongthong T, Dangayach GS (2005) New manufacturing technology implementation: a study of the Thai automotive industry. Prod Plan Control 16:263–272

  18. 18.

    Lévy JP, Varela M (2003) Análisis multivariable para las ciencias sociales. Prentice Hall, Madrid

  19. 19.

    Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 22:1–55

  20. 20.

    Low-Lock K, Seetharaman A (2003) Towards a better manufacturing sector: a perspective on the implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Malaysia. Int J Manag 20:234–239

  21. 21.

    Mital A, Pennathur A (2004) Advanced technologies and humans in manufacturing workplaces: an interdependent relationship. Int J Ind Ergon 33:295–313

  22. 22.

    Millen R, Sohal A (1998) Planning processes for advanced manufacturing technology by large American manufacturers. Technovation 18:741–750

  23. 23.

    Noori H (1997) Implementing advanced manufacturing technology: the perspective of a newly industrialized country (Malaysia). Jour High Tech Manag Res 8:1–20

  24. 24.

    Nunally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill, New York

  25. 25.

    Nunnally JC, Bernstein H (2005) Teoría psicométrica. McGraw-Hill Interamericana, México

  26. 26.

    Pollandt S, Wille R (2005) Functorial scaling of ordinal data. Discret Appl Math 147:101–111

  27. 27.

    Requena C, López V, González R, Ortiz T (2009) Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida en mujeres mayores activas. Rev Esp Geriatría y Gerontol 44:146–148

  28. 28.

    Tastle WJ, Wierman MJ (2007) Using consensus to measure weighted targeted agreement. Fuzzy Inf Process Soc 24:31–35

  29. 29.

    Shehabuddeen N, Probert D, Phaal R (2006) From theory to practice: challenges in operationalizing a technology selection framework. Technovation 26:324–335

  30. 30.

    Shepherd DA, McDemott C, Stock GN (2000) Advanced manufacturing technology: does more radicalness mean more perceived benefits? J High Tech Manag Res 11:19–33

  31. 31.

    Small MH, Chen IJ (1997) Economic and strategic justification of AMT inferences from industrial practices. Int J Prod Econ 49:65–75

  32. 32.

    Small MH, Yasin MM (1997) Advanced manufacturing technology: implementation policy and performance. J Oper Manag 15:349–370

  33. 33.

    Stock GN, McDermott CM (2001) Organizational and strategic predictors of manufacturing technology implementation success: an exploratory study. Technovation 21:625–636

  34. 34.

    Streiner D, Norman GR (1995) Health Measurement Scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  35. 35.

    Swink M, Nair A (2007) Capturing the competitive advantages of AMT: design–manufacturing integration as a complementary asset. J Oper Manag 25:36–754

  36. 36.

    Torralva T, Roca M, Gleichgerrcht E, Bonifacio A, Raimondi C, Manes F (2011) Validación de la versión en español del Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revisado (ACE-R). Neurologia 26:351–356

  37. 37.

    Zairi M (1992) Measuring success in AMT implementation using customer-supplier interaction criteria. Int J Oper Prod Manag 12:34–55

  38. 38.

    Zhou H, Keong LG, Jonsson P, Sum CC (2009) A comparative study of advanced manufacturing technology and manufacturing infrastructure investments in Singapore and Sweden. Int J Prod Econ 120:42–53

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Jorge L. García A.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García A, J.L., Alvarado I, A. Problems in the implementation process of advanced manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64, 123–131 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4011-9

Download citation


  • AMT
  • Implementation process
  • Pitfalls in AMT implementation
  • CSF
  • Factor analysis