Techno-economic evaluation of reducing shielding gas consumption in GMAW whilst maintaining weld quality

  • S. W. Campbell
  • A. M. Galloway
  • N. A. McPherson


A series of experimental trials have been conducted to investigate the effects of reducing the shielding gas consumption in gas metal arc welding (GMAW). A number of claims have been made as to potential shielding gas savings in the GMAW process when using gas-saving devices such as commercially available self-regulating valves. However, the literature and data available on weld quality obtained as a result of reducing the shielding gas flow rate is not readily available, so the thrust of this study is to present a new body of data to report on the technical and economic merits of controlling the shielding gas flow rate using (a) a conventional flow meter and (b) a ‘new to market’ self-regulating gas-saving device. It has been determined that, in a draft-free environment, the shielding gas flow rate can be reduced to 6 L/min without diminishing weld quality, although a lower flow rate was more susceptible to the effects of cross-drafts, and the weld quality level was compromised. In addition to the economic savings associated with reducing the shielding gas flow rate, there are several weld aspects that have been found to be influenced by the shielding gas flow rate including penetration, leg length, distortion and peak temperature, thus suggesting that the heat transfer efficiency is affected by the shielding gas flow rate. This significant finding supports the view that there is scope to increase the travel speed when implementing a lower flow rate and, consequently, enhance productivity.


GMAW Shielding gas consumption Gas-saving devices Improved efficiency Metallurgy Radiography Distortion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Campbell SW, Galloway AM, McPherson NA (2012) Artificial neural network prediction of weld geometry performed using GMAW with alternating shielding gases. Weld J (in press)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campbell SW, Galloway AM, McPherson NA (2011) Techno-economic evaluation on the effects of alternating shielding gases for advanced joining processes. Proceedings of IMechE Part B: J Eng Manuf 225:1863–1872Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell SW, Galloway AM, McPherson NA, Gillies A (2012) Evaluation of gas metal arc welding with alternating shielding gases for use on AA6082T6. Proc IMechE, J Eng Manuf (in press)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang YH (2006) Improve GMAW and GTAW with alternating shield gases. Weld J 85(2):41–43Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang BY, Prasad YKDV, Kang MJ, Kim HJ, Kim IS (2009) Characteristics of alternate supply of shielding gas in aluminium GMA welding. J Mater Process Technol 209:4716–4121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kang BY, Prasad YKDV, Kang MJ, Kim HJ, Kim IS (2009) The effect of alternate supply of shielding gases in austenite stainless steel GTA welding. J Mater Process Technol 209:4722–4127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marya M, Edwards GR, Liu S (2004) An investigation on the effects of gases in GTA welding of a wrought AZ80 magnesium alloy. Weld J 83(7):203–212Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tani G, Campana G, Fortunato A, Ascari A (2007) The influence of shielding gas in hybrid laser-MIG welding. Appl Surf Sci 253:8050–8053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galloway AM, McPherson NA, Baker TN (2011) An evaluation of weld metal nitrogen retention and properties in 316LN austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Des Appl 225(2):61–69Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gillies A, Galloway AM, McPherson NA (2011) Helium additions to MIG shielding gas—an economic option? Weld Cut 10(2):118–121Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Industries L (2010) New welding gas innovation. Australasian Weld J 55(1):10–11Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uttrachi GD (2007) GMAW shielding gas flow control systems. Weld J 86(4):22–23Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Skovfo JL, Jørgensen AH (2011) Optimizing gas usage in arc welding. Presented at JOM 16 Conference, May 2011, Helsingø.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldsberry C (2008) Preventing shielding gas waste can boost the bottom line. Weld Des Fabr 81(1):22–23Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weber R (2003) How to save 20% on welding costs. Trailer-Body Builders 44(3)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Standifer LR (2000) Shielding gas consumption efficiency. Fabricator 30(6)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stauffer HV (1982) Apparatus and method for reducing the waste of welding gas. US Patent Number 4,341,237.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hanby SK (2002) Apparatus and method for preventing gas-surge in a welding gas delivery system. US Patent Number 6,390,134,B1.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uttrachi GD (2003) Welding shielding gas saver device. US Patent Number 6,610,957,B2.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Uttrachi GD (2006) Welding shielding gas saver flow-control device. US Patent Number 7,015,412,B1.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McPherson NA, MacPherson MJ, Galloway AM, Gillies A, Campbell SW, Scanlon T, Moir A, Moore AJ, Wu T (2011) GMAW gas shielding—economic savings without detriment to quality. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Materials Science. Metal & Manufacturing (M3 2011), 12–13 December 2011, Singapore. GSTF, pp. 65–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. W. Campbell
    • 1
  • A. M. Galloway
    • 1
  • N. A. McPherson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowScotland
  2. 2.BAE Systems Surface Ships LimitedGlasgowScotland

Personalised recommendations