Advertisement

Development of a novel ultrasonic unit for grinding of ceramic matrix composites

  • Bahman AzarhoushangEmail author
  • Taghi Tawakoli
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) are promising materials for many high-technology engineering applications in harsh and severe environments due to their superior properties. However, in spite of all advantages, the employment of CMCs has been impeded by their high machining and finishing costs. Many of recently developed CMCs are very difficult to machine with the conventional machining technology, and improvement of the existing machining process is required and crucial. To overcome the existing technological constraints in the grinding of CMCs, a special designed block sonotrode was invented (and was registered for patent). The realization of ultrasonic-assisted machining on conventional machine tools can be carried out with much less effort by means of the new invented system. The invented block sonotrode is a specially designed perforated plate and demonstrates a multi-resonant frequency behavior. Experimental results illustrate the high performance of the presented method. A significant reduction in grinding forces and surface roughness and an increase in G-ratio have been achieved.

Keywords

Ultrasonic-assisted grinding Block sonotrode Ceramic matrix composite Grinding forces Surface roughness Grinding temperature Tool wear 

References

  1. 1.
    Kazantsev VF (1979) Characteristic features of the plastic deformation of a material subjected to impact ultrasonic effects. AkustikaUl’trazvuk. Tekh., No. 15, pp 45–47Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Markov AI (1980) Ultrasonic treatment of materials (in Russian). Mashinostroenie, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nerubai MS (1987) Effect of ultrasonic vibrations on the mechanical properties of difficult-to-deform materials. Met Sci Heat Treat 29(4):254–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panin AV, Klimenov VA, Pochivalov YI, Son AA, Kazachenok MS (2004) The effect of ultrasonic treatment on mechanical behavior of titanium and steel specimens. Theor Appl Fract Mech 41:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Severdenko P, Klubovichand VV, Stepanenko AV (1973) Pressure working of metals with ultrasound (in Russian). Nauka i Tekhnika, MinskGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao B, Wu Y, Liu CS, Gaoand AH, Zhu XS (2006) The study on ductile removal mechanisms of ultrasonic vibration grinding nano-ZrO2 ceramics. Key Eng Mater 304–305:171–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao B, Wu Y, Jiao F, Gao GF, Zhu XS (2007) Experimental research on surface integrity of ceramic nanocomposites in two-dimensional ultrasonic vibration grinding. Key Eng Mater 329:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Azarhoushang B, Tawakoli T (2009) Ultrasonicmachiningunit (in German), Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt, Aktenzeichen, 102009017248.3Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krenkel W (2008) Ceramic matrix composites. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malkin S, Hwang T (1996) Grinding mechanisms for ceramics. Ann CIRP 45(2):569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wagemann A (2001) Ceramic tools in metal forming (in German). SchmiedejournalGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li ZC, Jiao Y, Deines TW, Pei ZJ, Treadwell C (2005) Rotary ultrasonic machining of ceramic matrix composites: feasibility study and designed experiments. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1402–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tashiro T, Fujiwara J, Takenaka Y (2007) Grinding of C/C-SiC composite in dry method, in the book of towards synthesis of micro-/nano-systems, part 3. Springer, London, pp 351–352Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weinert K, Jansen T (2008) Machining aspects for the drilling of C/C-SiC materials. In: Krenkel W (ed) Ceramic matrix composites. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abdullah A, Pak A (2008) Correct prediction of the vibration behavior of the high power ultrasonic transducer by FEM simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol IJAMT 39(1–2):21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Azarhoushang B, Akbari J (2007) Ultrasonic-assisted drilling of Inconel 738-LC. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(7–8):1027–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnson DH, Pal D (2000) Simulation of an ultrasonic piezoelectric transducer. In: Proceedings of the 9th International ANSYS Conference, August 29Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prokic M (1997) A 1997 device for the generation of ultrasonic waves (in French). French patent application 2 743 929 (No d’enregistrement national: 9601029)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prokic M (2001) Multifrequency ultrasonic structural actuator (MMM technology). European patent application, EP 1238715A1Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Daus NA (2004) Ultrasonic assisted cross peripheral grinding (in German). Dissertation, Technische Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tawakoliand T, Azarhoushang B (2008) Influence of ultrasonic vibrations on dry grinding of soft steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(14):1585–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Uhlmann E, Daus NA (2000) Ultrasonic assisted grinding—application advantages through an innovative grinding process (in German). BMBF-AbschlussberichtGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu Y, Fan Y, Kato M, Kuriyagawa T, Syoji K, Tachibana T (2004) Development of an ultrasonic elliptic-vibration shoe centerless grinding technique. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:1780–1787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cartsburg H (1993) Hard machining of ceramic composites (in German). Dissertation, Technische Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qu W, Wang K, Miller MH, Huang Y, Chandra A (2000) Using vibration-assisted grinding to reduce subsurface damage. Precision Eng J 24:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Frederick JR (1965) Ultrasonic engineering. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gordeev AV (1997) Wear resistance of segmental diamond wheels. Mach Tool (Eng translation Stanki Instrument) 48(2):21–22Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim JD, Kang YH, Jin DX, Lee YS (1997) Development of discontinuous grinding wheel with multiporous grooves. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 37(11):1611–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lawn BR, Evans AG, Marshall DB (1980) Elastic/plastic indentation damage in ceramics: the median/radial crack system. J Am Ceram Soc 63(9–10):574–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Evans AG, Wilshaw TR (1976) Quasi-plastic solid particle damage in brittle materials. Acta Metall 24:939–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brown RH, Saito K, Shaw MC (1971) Local elastic deflections in grinding. Ann CIRP 19:105–113Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yamada T, Lee HS (2005) Study on elastic deformations of grinding wheels due to centrifugal forces by means of the grinding wheels model consisting of abrasive grains and bonds. J Jpn Soc Abrasive Technol JSAT 49(10):576–581Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Puw HY, Hocheng H (1999) Milling of polymer composites. In: Jahanmir S, Ramulu M, Koshy P (eds) Machining of ceramics and composites. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 267–294Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Grinding and Precision Technology, KSFFurtwangen UniversityFurtwangenGermany

Personalised recommendations