Monitoring of liquid droplets in laser-enhanced GMAW

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In the laser-enhanced gas metal arc welding (GMAW) process developed recently, droplets of melted metal can be detached from the wire under relatively low currents with the assistance of an auxiliary force provided by a laser. The stability of the arc and the quality of the resultant welds are improved. To compete with the gas tungsten arc welding of the much lower productivity in joining precision, the size of the droplet can be pre-defined and be controlled to meet the requirements from different applications. For this purpose, image processing algorithms are developed to measure the size of a growing droplet during the laser-enhanced GMAW process. The relatively low contrast, strong illumination and reflection caused by the laser, and strong radiation from the arc make an automatic processing of the image challenging. Images are analyzed to understand its characteristics and design the image processing and recognition algorithms accordingly. In particular, a model-based method is used to filter out non-droplet edge points and a second order equation in the polar coordinate system is introduced to model the droplet. Experimental results verified the effectiveness of the developed algorithms.

Keywords

Image processing Edge detection Modeling GMAW Metal transfer 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Saeed G, Zhang YM (2003) Mathematical formulation and simulation of specular reflection based measurement system for gas tungsten arc weld pool surface. Meas Sci Technol 14(8):1671–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tsai CH, Hou KH, Chuang HT (2006) Fuzzy control of pulsed GTA welds by using real-time root bead image feedback. J Mater Process Technol 176:158–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang YM, Kovacevic R, Li L (1996) Adaptive control of full penetration GTA welding. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 4(4):394–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bae KY, Lee TH, Ahn KC (2002) An optical sensing system for seam tracking and weld pool control in gas metal arc welding of steel pipe. J Mater Process Technol 120:458–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Song HS, Zhang YM (2008) Measurement and analysis of three-dimensional specular gas tungsten arc weld pool surface. Welding J 87(4):85s–95sGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fan CJ, Lv FL, Chen SB (2009) Visual sensing and penetration control in aluminum alloy pulsed GTA welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42(1–2):126–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Brien RL (1991) Welding Handbook, vol. 2: welding processes, 8th ed. American Welding SocietyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rhee S, Kannatey-Asibu E (1991) Analysis of arc pressure effect on metal transfer in gas-metal arc welding. J Appl Phys 70(9):5068–5075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang G, Huang PG, Zhang YM (2004) Numerical analysis of metal transfer in gas metal arc welding under modified pulsed current conditions. Metall Mater Trans B 35(5):857–866MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang Y, Zhang YM (2010) Laser enhanced GMAW. Welding J 89(9):181s–189sGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital image processing, 2nd ed. Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang ZZ, Zhang YM (2009) Brightness based selection and edge detection based enhancement separation algorithm for low resolution metal transfer images. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 6(1):181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang ZZ, Li GL (2003) A new cross based gradient descent search algorithm for block matching in MPEG-4 encoder. Chin J Electron 12(4):648–651Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hartigan JA, Wong MA (1979) Algorithm as 136, a K-means clustering algorithm. J RSS 28(1):100–108MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations