Robotic fiber placement process analysis and optimization using response surface method

  • Tauseef Aized
  • Bijan Shirinzadeh


Unlike traditional materials, composites are carefully designed materials suitable for specific applications. Conventional methods of fabrication of composite structures have proven to be labor intensive and time-consuming. Robotic fiber placement is a composite fabrication technique that increases the flexibility of fiber placement process and allows for the fabrication of more complex structures. This study is aimed at analyzing and optimizing the robotic fiber placement process parameters. Many experiments have been conducted to analyze gas torch temperature, fiber laying head speed, and fiber compaction force and the process is optimized using response surface method.


Robotic fiber placement Process parameters Optimization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alici G, Shirinzadeh B, McConville A, Foong CW, Marcelo A (2002) A mathematical model for a pneumatically actuated robotic fibre placement system. Robotica 20:545–551Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson MJ, Whitcomb PJ (2005) RSM Simplified. Productivity, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barrentine LB (1999) An introduction to design of experiments. ASQ Quality, Milwaukee, WIGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grant C (2006) Automated processes for composite aircraft structure. Ind Robot 33(2):117–121MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harper LT, Turner TA, Warrior NA, Rudd CD (2007) Characterisation of random carbon fibre composites from a directed fibre preforming process: the effect of tow filamentisation. Composites A 38(3):755–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heider D, Piovoso MJ, Gillespie JW Jr (2003) A neural network model-based open-loop optimization for the automated thermoplastic composite tow-placement system. Composites A 34(8):791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    James DL, Black WZ (1994) Experimental analysis and process window development for continuous filament wound APC-2. In: Thermal processing of materials: thermo-mechanics, controls and composites (ASME), HTD-vol. 289, pp. 203–212Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kisch RA (2006) Automated fiber placement historical perspective. Proceedings, international SAMPE symposium and exhibition, creating new opportunities for the world economy, v 51,, SAMPE ‘06:, ISSN: 08910138Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Montgomery DC (2005) Design and analysis of experiments, 6th ed., Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pitchumani R, Gillespie JW, Lamontia MA (1997) Design and optimization of a thermoplastic two-placement process with in-situ consolidation. J Compos Mater 31:244–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Polini W, Sorrentino L (2005) Influence of winding speed and winding trajectory on tension in robotized filament winding of full section parts. Compos Sci Technol 65(10):1574–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schlimbach J, Mitschang P (2006) Process-based cycle time estimation for the thermoplastic tape placement. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 19(5):507–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shirinzadeh B, Cassidy G, Oetomo D, Alici G, Ang MH Jr (2007) Trajectory generation for open-contoured structures in robotic fibre placement. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 23(4):380–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shirinzadeh B, Foong CW, Tan BH (2000) Robotic fibre placement process planning and control. Assemb Autom 20(4):313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shirinzadeh B, Alici G, Foong CW, Cassidy G (2004) Fabrication process of open surfaces by robotic fibre placement. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 20:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sonmez FO, Akbulut M (2007) Process optimization of tape placement for thermoplastic composites. Composites A 38(9):2013–2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sonmez FO, Hahn HT (1997) Analysis of the on-line consolidation process in thermoplastic composite tape placement. J Theroplast Compos Mater 10(6):543–572Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sturges RH, Moutran S, Abbott MW, Lee M (2002) Process design for the automation of online-consolidation composite fiber placement. Proc ASME Des Eng Tech Conf 3:255–263Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tierney J, Gillespie Jr (2006) Modelling of in situ strength development for the thermoplastic composite tow placement process. J Compos Mater 40(16):1487–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wiehn MP, Hale RD (2002) Low cost robotic fabrication methods for tow placement. Proceedings of international SAMPE symposium and exhibition, Soc. for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, v. 47 II, pp. 1842–1852Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical, Mechatronics and Manufacturing, EngineeringUniversity of Engineering and Technology, KSK CampusLahorePakistan
  2. 2.Robotics and Mechatronics Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical EngineeringMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations