Advertisement

The formability of annealed and pre-aged AA-2024 sheets in single-point incremental forming

  • G. HussainEmail author
  • L. Gao
  • N. Hayat
  • N. U. Dar
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The formability of AA-2024 sheets, an aerospace grade material, in the annealed and pre-aged conditions has been investigated in the single-point incremental forming (SPIF) process. The major operating parameters, namely step size, tool radius, and forming speed, of SPIF process were varied over wide ranges, and their effect on the formability was quantified through a response surface method called as central composite rotational design. It was found that the interaction of step size and tool radius is very significant on the formability. Moreover, a variation in the forming speed does not affect the formability of annealed AA-2024 sheet. However, the formability of pre-aged AA-2024 sheet decreases with the increase in the forming speed. Furthermore, the annealed sheet shows higher formability than the pre-aged sheet.

Keywords

Incremental forming Formability Operating parameters Response surface Material state 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amino H, Lu Y, Ozawa S, Fukuda K, Maki T (2002) Dieless NC forming of automotive service panels. Proceedings of the conference on Advanced Techniques of Plasticity, pp 1015–1020Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leach D, Green A, Bramley AN (2001) A new incremental forming process for small batch and prototype parts. Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Sheet Metal, Leuven, Belgium, pp 211–218Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ambrogio G, De Napoli L, Filice L, Gagliardi F, Muzzupappa M (2005) Application of incremental forming process for high customized medical product manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 162–163:156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jie L, Jianhua M, Shuhuai H (2004) Sheet metal dieless forming and its tool path generation based on STL files. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23:696–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shim MS, Park JJ (2001) The formability of aluminum sheet in incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 113:654–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hussain G, Gao L (2007) A novel method to test the thinning limits of sheet-metals in negative incremental forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:419–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang Y, Wang YJ, Cao J, Li M (2007) Prediction of forming limits in single point incremental forming with the ductile fracture criterion. Proceedings of the 2nd international Manufacturing Science and Engineering conference, USA, p 31129Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jeswiet J, Yong D (2004) Wall thickness variations in single point incremental forming. Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: J Engrg Manuf 218:1453–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim TJ, Yang DY (2004) Improvement of formability for the incremental sheet metal forming process. Int J Mech Sci 42:1271–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fratini L, Ambrogio G, Lorenzo RD, Filice L, Micari F (2004) Influence of mechanical properties of the sheet material on formability in single point incremental forming. CIRP Ann 53:207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hussain G, Gao L, Hayat N (2008) A new formability indicator in single point Incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 209:4237–4242. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim YH, Park JJ (2002) Effect of process parameters on formability in incremental forming of sheet metal. J Mater Process Technol 130–13:42–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hussain G, Gao L, Zhang ZY (2008) Formability evaluation of a pure titanium sheet in the cold incremental forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:920–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ham M, Jeswiet J (2006) Single point incremental forming and the forming criteria for AA3003. CIRP Ann 55(1):241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechanical & Electrical EngineeringNanjing University of Aeronautics & AstronauticsNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Engineering & TechnologyLahorePakistan
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Engineering & TechnologyTaxilaPakistan

Personalised recommendations