Preform and forging process designs based on geometrical features using 2D and 3D FEM simulations

  • Jinn-Jong SheuEmail author
  • Cheng-Hsien Yu


The requirements of compact and integrated industrial products make it more difficult to produce these complicated parts. The aim of this paper attempts to propose methods of finish forging die and preform designs to produce a product consisting of a solid spur gear and cylindrical cup features. One- and two-step forming processes were proposed and evaluated using computer-aided engineering simulations. For one-step extrusion or upsetting processes, diameters and heights of billet were calculated using the product volume and the corresponding cup or gear features, respectively. For two-step forming process, Tee-shaped preform designs were proposed based on the product volume and the feature volume ratio of cup to gear; corner and fillet arcs were adopted to modify the profile of Tee and control the material flow in the finisher die. The forming processes of preform and finisher were analyzed using the two- and three-dimensional finite-element method models to predict the detail characteristics of sectional material flow and the completely three-dimensional deformation results, respectively. Experimental tests were also carried out to validate the proposed simulation models and design methods. The forming loads, the stress and strain distributions of forged part, and the occurrences of defects were studied and a suitable preform and corresponding die designs were obtained. The proposed preform designs were verified via the numerical analyses for the feasibility study. Finally, a sound gear product had been made successfully using the proposed suitable design of preform.


Preform design Forging die design CAE simulation Defect prediction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dean TA (2000) The net-shape forming of gears. Mater Des 21:271–278Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sadeghi MH (2003) Gear forging: mathematical modeling and experimental validation. J Manuf Sci Eng 125:753–762 doi: 10.1115/1.1616952 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chitkara NR, Bhutta MA (1999) Forging and heading of hollow spur gear forms: an analysis and some experiments. Int J Mech Sci 41:1159–1189 doi: 10.1016/S0020-7403(98)00092-7 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chitkara NR, Kim Y (1996) An analysis of external spline gear forming by an upper bound energy method. Int J Mech Sci 38(7):777–789 doi: 10.1016/0020-7403(95)00084-4 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chitkara NR, Kim Y (1996) Upper bound analysis of near-net shaped forging of gear coupling form. Int J Mech Sci 38(7):791–803 doi: 10.1016/0020-7403(95)00085-2 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tomov BI, Gagov VI (1999) Modelling and description of the near-net-shape forging of cylindrical spur gears. J Mater Process Technol 92:444–449 doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00169-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kang GJ, Song WJ, Kim J, Kang BS, Park HJ (2005) Numerical approach to forging process of a gear with inner cam profile using FEM. J Mater Process Technol 164–165:1212–1217 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee YK, Lee SR, Lee CH, Yang DY (2001) Process modification of bevel gear forging using three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Mater Process Technol 113:59–63 doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00701-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Song JH, Im YT (2004) Determination of a major design parameter for forward extrusion of spur gears. J Manuf Sci Eng 126:255–263 doi: 10.1115/1.1688379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petruska J, Janicek L (1998) Computationally-experimental workability determination of compressed cylindrical specimen with surface defect. J Mater Process Technol 80-81:572–578 doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00164-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cai J, Dean TA, Hu ZM (2004) Alternative die designs in net-shape forging of gears. J Mater Process Technol 150:48–55 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.01.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yeo HT, Choi Y, Hur KD (2001) Analysis and design of the prestressed cold extrusion die. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18:54–61 doi: 10.1007/s001700170094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fu MW, Yong MS, Muramatsu T (2008) Die fatigue life design and assessment via CAE simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:843–851 doi: 10.1007/s00170-006-0762-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coffin LF (1954) A study of the effects of cyclic thermal stresses on a ductile metal. Trans ASME 76:931–950Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mansion SS (1953) Behavior of materials under conditions of thermal stress. Heat Transfer Symposium, University of Michigan Engineering Research Institute, pp 9–75Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu CY, Hsu YC (2002) Optimal shape design of an extrusion-forging die using a polynomial network and a genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20:128–137 doi: 10.1007/s001700200134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin JC, Tai CC (1999) The application of neural networks in the prediction of spring-back in an L-shaped bend. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15:163–170 doi: 10.1007/s001700050053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lapovok R (1998) Improvement of die life by minimisation of damage accumulation and optimisation of preform design. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:608–612 doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00213-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kang RS, Lee JH, Kim BM, Choi JC (1995) Process design in fleshless forging of rib/web-shaped plane-strain components by the finite element method. J Mater Process Technol 47:291–309 doi: 10.1016/0924-0136(95)85005-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chang CC, Bramley AN (2000) Forging preform design using a reverse simulation approach with the upper bound finite element procedure. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C. J Mech Eng Sci 214(1):127–136Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tomov B (2007) Hot closed die forging—state-of-art and future development. J Achievements Mater Manuf Eng 24(1):443–449Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Teterin GP, Tarnovskij IJ, Chechik AA (1966) A shape complexity criterion. Kuznecno – shtampovochnoe, proizwodstvo 7. pp 6–9 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao Q, Wright ED, Grandhi RV (1995) Forging preform design with shape complexity control in simulating backward deformation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35(9):1225–1239 doi: 10.1016/0890-6955(94)00117-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Altan T, Kobayashi S, Oh SI (1989) Metal forming and the finite element method. Oxford University Press, New York, p 32Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Altan T, Ngaile G, Shen G (2005) Cold and hot forging fundamentals and applications. American Society for Metals, Schaumberg, pp 27–40Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mold and Die EngineeringNational Kaohsiung University of Applied SciencesKaohsiungTaiwan
  2. 2.Graduate student, Department of Mold and Die EngineeringNational Kaohsiung University of Applied SciencesKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations