Advertisement

Process improvement: performance analysis of the setup time reduction-SMED in the automobile industry

  • Mehmet Cakmakci
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Flexibility and responsiveness to customer demands are very important for success. Generally additional time is needed for setup caused by poor design of equipment. At this point the terms continuous process improvement and SMED (single minute exchange of dies) as an approach of lean manufacturing come into play. A lean manufacturing system is part of corporate culture, like tools and approaches. In this research work, the process capability analysis technique is implemented by using MINITAB14 software to investigate the relation between SMED methodology and equipment design. The index Cpk has been used in this application study to provide a quantitative measurement of the equipment design by applying the SMED methodology in automobile manufacturing. The results of this research study indicated that SMED in other words “quick changeover” is still a suitable method not only for manufacturing improvement but also for equipment/die design development.

Keywords

Single minute exchange of dies (SMED) Process improvement Process capability analysis (PCA) Process capability index Equipment design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Van Goubergen D (2000) Set-up reduction as an organization-wide problem. Proceeding of the IIE Solutions 2000, Cleveland, OhioGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spann MS, Adams M, Rahman M, Czarnecki H, Schroer BJ (1999) Transferring lean manufacturing to small manufacturers: The role of NIST-MEP. University of Alabama in HuntsvilleGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shingo S (1985) A revolution in manufacturing, the SMED system. Productivity PressGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asano T (2002) Lean manufacturing as lean thinking Japanese definition, JMA Consultants America, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Womack JP, Jones DT (1997) Lean thinking. Simon and Schuster, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garcia JAM, Pardo del Val M, Bonavia Martin T (2006) The impact of training and ad hoc teams in industrial settings. MSEM 1(2):137–147Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cakmakci M, Karasu MK (2007) Set-up time reduction process and integrated predetermined time system MTM-UAS: A study of application in a large size company of automobile industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(3–4):334–344Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eti MC, Ogaji SOT, Robert SD (2004) Implementing total productive maintenance in Nigerian manufacturing industries. Appl Energy 79:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chand G, Shirvani B (2000) Implementation of TPM in cellular manufacture. J Mater Process Technol 103:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun H, Yam R, Wai-Keung NG (2003) The implementation and evaluation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)—an action case study in a Hong Kong manufacturing company. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 22:224–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prado JC (2001) Beyond quality circles and improvement teams. TQM 12(6):789–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bamber L, Dale BG (2000) Lean production: A study of application in a traditional manufacturing environment. Prod Plan Control 11(3):291–298Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McAdam R, McGeough F (2000) Implementing total productive maintenance in multi-union manufacturing organizations: overcoming job demarcation. TQM 11(2):187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilmore M, Smith DJ (1996) Set-up reduction in pharmaceutical manufacturing: an action research study. Int J Oper Prod Man 16(3):4–17Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moxham C, Greatbanks R (2001) Prerequisites for the implementation of the SMED methodology: A study in a textile processing environment. Int J Qual Reliab Man 18(4):404–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McIntosh R, Culley S, Gest G, Mileham T, Owen G (1996) An assessment of the role of design in the improvement of changeover performance. Int J Oper Prod Man 16(9):5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Goubergen D, Van Landeghem H (2002) Reducing setup times of manufacturing lines. Proceeding of International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, Dresden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Goubergen D, Van Landeghem H (2002) Rules for integrating fast changeover capabilities into new equipment design. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 18:205–214Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mileham AR, Culley SJ, Owen GW, McIntosh RI (1999) Rapid Changeover– a pre-requisite for responsive manufacture. Int J Prod Man 19(8):785–796Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patel S, Shaw P, Dale BG (2001) Set-up time reduction and mistake proofing methods: A study of application in a small company. Bus Process Man J 7(1):65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Auto/Steel Partnership Program (1999) Stamping process variation: An analysis of stamping process capability and implications for design, die tryout and process control. Final Report, SouthfieldGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Montgomery DC (1997) Introduction to statistical quality control. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hitch KL, Tong lI (2005) Incorporating process capability index and quality loss function into analyzing the process capability for qualitative data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (online published)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pearn WL, Chen KS (1997) Capability indices for non-normal distributions with an application in electrolytic capacitor manufacturing. Microelectron Reliab 37(12):1853–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin H-C (2005) Using normal approximation for calculating the p-value in assessing process capability index Cpk. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:160–166zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18:805–820Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cakmakci M, Nasirlialp M (2005) Process capability analysis for normal and non-normal distribution with an application in advanced manufacturing. Proceeding of the 3th International Congress of Precision Machining, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lin H-C (2004) The measurement of a process capability for folded normal process data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:223–228Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sentürk S, Yazici B (2001) Six sigma program and an application, Exchange of Technology and Know-how, New Techniques for Statistics EKT 2001. Proceeding of the International Seminar of European Commission, Crete, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Durman MBS, Pakdil F (2005) Istatiksel proses control uygulamalari icin bir system tasarimi. Proceeding, IIV. Ulusal Ekonometri ve Istatistik Sempozyumu, Istanbul, TurkeyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering Faculty Industrial Engineering DepartmentDokuz Eylül UniversityIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations