Advertisement

The study of fixture stiffness – Part II: contact stiffness identification between fixture components

  • Y. Zheng
  • Z. Hou
  • Y. RongEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

This paper describes an experimental investigation to estimate the contact stiffness in normal and tangential directions. The static method was used to estimate normal contact stiffness and to study the effecting factors. In order to study tangential contact stiffness, dynamic methods were developed to estimate contact stiffness in both normal and tangential directions. That study is validated by the results of the static method in the identification of normal contact stiffness.

Keywords

Fixture Stiffness Contact mechanics Friction FEA 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fischer-Cripps Anthony C (2000) Introduction to contact mechanics. Springer-Verlag, New York, InczbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beards CF The damping of structural vibration by controlled inter-facial slip in joints. An ASME publication, 8 l-DET-86Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becker, Wyatt Patricia J (1999) Using rigid-body dynamics to measre joint stiffness. Mech Syst Signal Process 13(5):789–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meng CH (1986) The influence of microslip on vibratory response. J Sound Vib 107(2):279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ren Y, Beards CF (1993) On the importance of weighting for FRF joint identification. In: The 11th International Modal Analysis Conference. Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ren Y, Beards CF (1995) On substructure synthesis with FRF data. J Sound Vib 845–866Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rong Y, Zhu Y (1999) Computer-aided fixture design. Dekker, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shigley JE, Mischke CR (1989) Mechanical engineering design. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang Tachung, Shuo-Hao Fan, Chorng-Shyan Lin (2003) Joint Stiffness identification using FRF measurements. Comp Struct 81:2459–2566Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yeh JH, Liou FW (1999) Contact condition modeling for machining fixture setup processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39:787–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang JH, MJ Yang (1999) Problems and solutions in the parameters of mechanical joints. In the 3rd International Conference in Inverse Problem in Engineering: theory and practice, June 13-18, Port Ludlow, WA, U.S.A., ASME Paper No. ME 03Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Worcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations