Advertisement

A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method

  • R. V. Rao
  • J. P. Davim
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Material selection is a difficult and subtle task due to the immense number of different available materials. In choosing the right material, there is not always a single definite criterion of selection and the designers and engineers have to take into account a large number of material selection criteria. This paper presents a logical procedure for material selection for a given engineering design. The procedure is based on a combined TOPSIS and AHP method. The proposed material selection index helps to evaluate and rank the materials for a given engineering design. Two examples are included to illustrate the approach.

Keywords

Material selection TOPSIS AHP 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Liao TW (1996) A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making method for material selection. J Manuf Syst 15:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashby MF (2000) Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection’. Mater Des 48:359–369Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashby MF, Brechet YJM, Cebon D, Salvo L (2004) Selection strategies for materials and processes. Mater Des 25:51–67Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashby MF (1992) Materials selection in mechanical design. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ashby MF, Johnson K (2002) Materials and design: the art and science of materials selection in product design. Butterworth Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards KL (2005) Selecting materials for optimum use in engineering components. Mater Des 26:469–473Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trethewey KR, Wood RJK, Puget Y, Roberge PR (1998) Development of a knowledge-based system for materials management. Mater Des 19:39–56Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sapuan SM (2001) A knowledge-based system for materials selection in mechanical engineering design. Mater Des 22:687–695Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jalham IS (2006) Decision-making integrated information technology (IIT) approach for material selection. Int J Comput Appl Technol 25:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zha XF (2005) A web-based advisory system for process and material selection in concurrent product design for a manufacturing environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25(3–4):233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amen R, Vomacka P (2001) Case-based reasoning as a tool for materials selection. Mater Des 22:353–358Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edwards KL (2002) Linking materials and design: an assessment of purpose and progress. Mater Des 23:255–264Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raj R, Enright MP, Frangopol DM (2000) A system level partitioning approach for analyzing the origins of variability in life prediction of tungsten filaments for incandescent lamps. Mater Des 21:9–18Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raj R (2000) An interdisciplinary framework for the design and life prediction of engineering systems. Trans ASME, J Eng Mater Technol 122:348–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ermolaeva NS, Kaveline KG, Spoormaker JL (2002) Material selection combined with optimal structural design: concept and some results. Mater Des 23:459–470Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giudice F, La Rosa G, Risitano A (2005) Materials selection in the lifecycle design process: a method to integrate mechanical and environmental performances in optimal choice. Mater Des 26:9–20Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deng YM, Edwards KL (2005) The role of materials identification and selection in engineering design. Mater Des DOI 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.05.003
  18. 18.
    Shanian A, Savadogo O (2006) A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making. Mater Des 27:329–337Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Edwards KL, Deng YM (2005) Supporting design decision-making when applying materials in combination. Mater Des DOI 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.12.009
  20. 20.
    Manshadi BD, Mahmudi H, Abedian A, Mahmudi R (2005) A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method. Materials & Design, DOI 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.06.023
  21. 21.
    Hwang CL, Yoon K (1982) Multiple attribute decision making - methods and applications - a state of art survey. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making - methods and applications. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoon YP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision making. SAGE Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saaty TL (1980) Analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill Publications, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saaty TL (2000) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with AHP. RWS Publications, PittsburgGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Agrawal VP, Kohli V, Gupta S (1991) Computer aided robot selection: the multiple attribute decision making approach. Int J Prod Res 29:1629–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Agrawal VP, Verma A, Agarwal S (1992) Computer-aided evaluation and selection of optimum grippers. Int J Prod Res 30:2713–2732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bhangale PP, Agrawal VP, Saha SK (2004) Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot. Mech Mach Theory 39:1345–1366zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Olson DL (2004) Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Math Comput Model 40:721–727zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Parkan C, Wu M (1999) Decision-making and performance measurement models with applications to robot selection. Comput Ind Eng 36:503–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zanakis SH, Solomon A, Wishart N, Dublish S (1998) Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods. Eur J Oper Res 107:507–529zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rao RV (2004) Performance evaluation of cutting fluids for green manufacturing using a combined multiple attribute decision making method. Int J Environ Conscious Des Manuf 2:34–42Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rao RV (2005) Machinability evaluation of work materials using a combined multiple attribute decision making method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28(3–4):221–227Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rao RV (2005) Machine selection in a flexible manufacturing cell using a combined multiple attribute decision making method. J Inst Eng, India, Prod Eng Div 85:75–79Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Venkatasamy R, Agrawal VP (1996) Selection of automobile vehicle by evaluation through graph theoretic methodology. Int J Veh Des 17:449–471Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Venkatasamy R, Agrawal VP (1997) A digraph approach to quality evaluation of an automotive vehicle. Qual Eng 9:405–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rao RV (2006) A decision making framework model for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using digraph and matrix methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (in Press), DOI 10.1007/s00170-005-0150-6

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShri Mata Vaishno Devi UniversityUdhampur DistrictIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations