Clad height control in laser solid freeform fabrication using a feedforward PID controller

  • Alireza Fathi
  • Amir Khajepour
  • Ehsan Toyserkani
  • Mohammad Durali
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

In this paper, a feedforward proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller is developed to effectively control the clad height in laser solid freeform fabrication (LSFF). The scanning velocity is selected as the input control variable and the clad height is chosen as the output. A novel knowledge-based Hammerstein model, including a linear dynamic and a nonlinear memoryless block, is developed, and its parameters are identified offline using experimental data. The architecture of the controller consists of a PID and a feedforward module, which is the inverse of the identified model. The advantage of adding a feedforward path to the PID controller is evaluated experimentally, in which the results show a lower overshoot and faster response times. Also, the performance of the controller is verified in the presence of geometrical disturbances, as well as in the fabrication of a nonplanar part.

Keywords

Laser solid freeform fabrication Feedforward control Feedback control Clad height control Rapid prototyping 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vilar R (1999) Laser cladding. J Laser Appl 11(2):64–79Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jeng JY, Lin MC (2001) Mold fabrication and modification using hybrid processes of selective laser cladding and milling. J Mater Process Technol 110(1):98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu D, Kovacevic R (2003) Sensing, modeling and control for laser-based additive manufacturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(1):51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mazumder J, Schifferer A, Choi J (1999) Direct materials deposition: designed macro and microstructure. Mater Res Innov 3(3):118–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu J, Li L (2004) In-time motion adjustment in laser cladding manufacturing process for improving dimensional accuracy and surface finish of the formed part. Opt Laser Technol 36(6):477–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hua Y, Choi J (2005) Adaptive direct metal/material deposition process using a fuzzy logic-based controller. J Laser Appl 17(4):200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Toyserkani E, Khajepour A, Corbin SF (2002) Application of experimental-based modeling to laser cladding. J Laser Appl 14(3):165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Römer GRBE, Aarts RGKM, Meijer J (1999) Dynamic models of laser surface alloying. Lasers Eng 8(4):251–266Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nelles O (2000) Nonlinear system identification. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, ISBN 3-540-67369-5Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frenk A, Vandyoussefi M, Wagniere JD, Zryd A, Kurz, W (1997) Analysis of the laser-cladding process for stellite on steel. Metall Mater Trans B—Proc Metall Mater Proc Sci 28(3):501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Toyserkani E, Khajepour A, Corbin SF (2003) Vision-based feedback control of laser powder deposition. In: Billingsley J (ed) Mechatronics and machine vision 2003 (M2VIP2003): future trends, RSP Press, Great Britain, ISBN 0-8638-0290-7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alireza Fathi
    • 1
  • Amir Khajepour
    • 1
  • Ehsan Toyserkani
    • 1
  • Mohammad Durali
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics EngineeringUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations