On optical design limitations of generalized two-mirror remote beam delivery laser systems: the case of remote welding

  • G. Tsoukantas
  • K. Salonitis
  • A. Stournaras
  • P. Stavropoulos
  • G. Chryssolouris


Remote welding opens new possibilities for the highly productive and qualitative joining of metal structures, especially in the automotive industry. This work first summarises the different types of remote welding systems (RWSs) based primarily on the different features of the laser beam scanning systems that RWSs implement. A generalised two-mirror scanning system is geometrically analyzed in order to evaluate the irradiated laser intensity on the workpiece as it changes due to the inclinations with which the laser beam impinges to the processing plane. The study discusses the limitations that a two-mirror scanning system enforces in remote welding, and sets the foundation for further theoretical and experimental investigation of this process.


Laser scanning systems Remote welding Remote welding systems Laser welding Inclined laser welding 



Remote welding system


Not possible to initiate keyhole welding, at such conditions, even at normal incidence


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Macken J (1996) Remote laser welding. IBEC ’96 Advanced Technologies & Processes, pp 11–15Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Highly Efficient & Flexible Remote Welding Systems for Advanced Welded Structures-REMOWELD project, G1RD-2000-00332, 2001–2003Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chryssolouris G (1991) Laser machining—theory and practice. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goebel G, Havrilla D, Wetzig A, Beyer E (2000) Laser welding with long focal length optics. ICALEO A/28–37Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rath W, Lingner M (2002) Remote laser welding system using slab laser technology: process data and technical applications. Proceedings of the 10th annual automotive laser applications workshop, March 12–13/2002, MI, USA, 119–127Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klotzbach A, Morgenthal L, Schwarz T, Fleischer V, Beyer E (2001) Laser welding on the fly with coupled axes systems. ICALEO, Jacksonville, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beyer E, Klotzbach A, Fleischer V, Morgenthal L (2003) Nd:YAG remote welding with robots. Proceedings of the second international WLT-conference on laser in manufacturing 2003, Munich, June, pp 367–373Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Belforte DA (2002) Remote welding: industrial laser solutions. July, 15–18Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menin R (2002) Remote laser welding. The COMAU solution. Proceedings of the 10th annual automotive laser applications workshop. March 12–13/2002, MI, USA, pp 101–116Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsoukantas G, Salonitis S, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2003) An overview of 3D laser materials’ processing concepts. 3rd GR-I International Conference on New Laser Technologies and Applications, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5131, pp 224–228Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leong KH, Geyger HK, Sabo KR, Sanders PG (1997) Threshold laser beam irradiances for melting and welding. J Laser Appl 9:227–231Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yue TM, Jiang CY, Xu JH, Lau WS (1996) Laser fantasy: from machining to welding. J Mater Process Technol 57:316–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsoukantas G, Chryssolouris G (2006) Theoretical and experimental analysis of the remote welding process on thin, lap-joined AISI 304 sheets. (submitted for publication)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Tsoukantas
    • 1
  • K. Salonitis
    • 1
  • A. Stournaras
    • 1
  • P. Stavropoulos
    • 1
  • G. Chryssolouris
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems and Automation, Department of Mechanical Engineering and AeronauticsUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations