Advertisement

A novel approach to the manufacturing and experimental investigation of closed-cell Al foams

  • Sheng-Chung TzengEmail author
  • Wei-Ping Ma
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

This investigation proposes a modified technique for manufacturing closed-cell aluminum (Al) foams to reduce the cost of the foaming agents during the casting and foaming processes. The addition of foaming agents promotes the uniformity of cell sizes and controls the viscosity of the melting aluminum alloy. This work elucidates the mechanical characteristics of closed-cell aluminum foams under compressive loading. The discussions in this paper cover the compressive stress–strain curve and the densification strain and energy absorption effects of various specimens with various porosities. The thermal conductivity of the aluminum foams is determined, and the results are compared with some theoretical predictions. The optimum parameters for meeting some practical design requirements, such as impact absorption and thermal insulation design applications, are discussed. Finally, an empirical correlation between the normalized yield strength and the relative densities is obtained.

Keywords

Foam Aluminum Foam Metal Foam Alloy Foam Normalize Yield Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Nomenclature

A

proportionality coefficient in Eq. (10) and (11)

q

heat flux, W·m −2

T

temperature, K

V

volume of the specimen, m 3

Vg

cellular volume (=φ·V), m 3

W

energy absorption per unit volume, MJ·m −3

α

coefficient in Eq. (8)

β

coefficient in Eq. (8)

ɛ

true strain

λ

thermal conductivity, W · m −1 K −1

ρ

density, kg · m −1

σ

true stress, MPa

φ

porosity

Superscripts

*

aluminum foam

Subscripts

D

densification

g

gas (air)

P

plastic collapse strength

S

solid wallmaterial

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank J King Inc. for the specimen supplement and technical consultation of the manufacturing process. The authors also sincerely appreciate the financial support for this research from the National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan, under contract no. NSC 92-2622-E-270-003-CC3.

References

  1. 1.
    Ashby MF, Evans AG, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG (2000) Metal foams: A design guide. Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banhart J (2001) Manufacture, characterization and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog Mater Sci 46(3):559–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lu TJ, Hess A, Ashby MF (1999) Sound absorption in metallic foams. J Appl Physi 85(11):7528–7539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sugimura Y, Meyer J, He MY, Bart-Smith H, Grenstedt J, Evans AG (1997) On the mechanical performance of closed cell Al alloy foams. Acta Mater 45(12):5245–5259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu TJ, Chen C (1999) Thermal transport and fire retardance properties of cellular aluminium alloys. Acta Mater 47(5):1469–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Santosa S, Wierzbicki T (1998) On the modeling of crush behavior of a closed-cell aluminum foam structure. J Mech Phys Solids 46(4):645–669CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCullough KYG, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (1999) Uniaxial stress–strain behavior of aluminium alloy foams. Acta Mater 47(8):2323–2330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paul A, Ramamurty U (2000) Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam. Mater Sci Eng A281:1–7Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dannemann KA, Lankford J Jr (2000) High strain rate compression of closed-cell aluminium foams. Mater Sci Eng A 293:157–164Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall IW, Guden M, Yu C-J (2000) Crushing of aluminum closed cell foams: density and strain rate effects. Scripta Mater 43:515–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andrews EW, Gioux G, Onck PR, Gibson LJ (2001) Size effects in ductile cellular solids. Part II: experimental results. Int J Mech Sci 43(3):701–713CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chino Y, Mabuchi M, Yamada Y, Hagiwara S, Iwasaki H (2003) An experimental investigation of effects of specimen size parameters on compressive and tensile properties in a closed cell Al foam. Mater Trans 44(4):633–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Motz C, Pippan R (2002) Fracture behaviour and fracture toughness of ductile closed-cell metallic foams. Acta Mater 50(8):2013–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mukai T, Kanahasji H, Miyoshi T, Mabuchi M, Nieh TG, Higashi K (1999) Experimental study of energy absorption in a close-celled aluminum foam under dynamic loading. Scripta Mater 40(8):921–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miyoshi T, Itoh M, Mukai T, Kanahashi H, Kozu H, Tanabe S, Higashi K (1999) Enhancement of energy absorption in a closed-cell aluminum by the modification of cellular structures. Scripta Mater 41(10):1055–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feng Y, Zheng H, Zhu Z, Zu F (2002) The microstructure and electrical conductivity of aluminum alloy foams. Mater Chem Phys 78(1):196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peak JW, Kang BH, Kim SY, Hyun JM (2000) Effective thermal conductivity and permeability of aluminum foam materials. Int J Thermophys 21(2):453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bhattacharya A, Calmidi VV, Mahajan RL (2002) Thermophysical properties of high porosity metal foams. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 45(5):1017–1031CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feng Y, Zhu Z, Tao N, Zhen H (2003) Thermal conductivity of closed-cell aluminum foam. Acta Metall Sin (China) 39(8):817–820 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids structures and properties, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grenestedt JL (1998) Influence of wavy imperfections in cell walls on elastic stiffness of cellular solids. J Mech Phys Solids 46(1):29–50CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Evans AG, Hutchinson JW, Ashby MF (1999) Multifunctionality of cellular metal system. Prog Mater Sci 43(3):171–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Simone AE, Gibson LJ (1998) The effects of solid distribution on the stiffness and strength of metallic foams. Acta Mater 46(6):2139–2150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Andrews EW, Sanders W, Gibson LJ (1999) Compressive and tensile behavior of aluminum foams. Mater Sci Eng A270:113–124Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simone AE, Gibson LJ (1998) Aluminum foams produced by liquid-state processes. Acta Mater 46(9):3109–3123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lu TJ, Ong JM (2001) Characterization of close-celled cellular aluminum alloys. J Mater Sci 36(11):2773–2786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Olurin OB, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (2000) Deformation and fracture of aluminum foams. Mater Sci Eng A291:136–146Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringChien Kuo Technology UniversityChanghuaPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Computer Application EngineeringLan Yang Institute of TechnologyIlanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations