Manufacturing of multi-material compliant mechanisms using multi-material molding

  • Regina M. Gouker
  • Satyandra K. GuptaEmail author
  • Hugh A. Bruck
  • Tobias Holzschuh


Multi-material compliant mechanisms enable many new design possibilities. Significant progress has been made in the area of design and analysis of multi-material compliant mechanisms. What is now needed is a method to mass-produce such mechanisms economically. A feasible and practical way of producing such mechanisms is through multi-material molding. Devices based on compliant mechanisms usually consist of compliant joints. Compliant joints in turn are created by carefully engineering interfaces between a compliant and a rigid material. This paper presents an overview of multi-material molding technology and describes feasible mold designs for creating different types of compliant joints found in multi-material compliant mechanisms. It also describes guidelines essential to successfully utilizing the multi-material molding process for creating compliant mechanisms. Finally, practical applications for the use of multi-material molding to create compliant mechanisms are demonstrated.


Compliant mechanisms Compliant joints Multi-material molding Mold design 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ananthasuresh GK, Kota S (1995) Designing compliant mechanisms. Mech Eng 117(11):93–96Google Scholar
  2. Bailey SA, Cham JG, Cutkosky MR, Full RJ (1999) Biomimetic robotic mechanisms via shape deposition manufacturing. 9th International Symposium of Robotics Research, Snowbird, UT, 9–12 October 1999Google Scholar
  3. Beaman J, Bourell D, Jackson B, Jepson L, McAdams D, Perez J, Wood K (2000) Multi-material selective laser sintering: empirical studies and hardware development. NSF Design and Manufacturing Grantees Conference, Vancouver, BC, 3–6 January 2000Google Scholar
  4. Bruck HA, Fowler G, Gupta SK, Valentine TM (2004) Using geometric complexity to enhance the interfacial strength of heterogeneous structures fabricated in a multi-stage, multi-piece molding process. Exp Mech 44:261–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryce DM (1996) Plastic injection molding, vol I: manufacturing process fundamentals. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MIGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldin DS, Venneri SL, Noor AK (2000) The great out of the small. Mech Eng 122:70–79Google Scholar
  7. Gordon MJ Jr (2003) Industrial design of plastic products. Wiley, Hoboken, N JGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodship V, Love JC (2002) Multi-material injection moulding. Rapra Technology, Shawbury, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Howell LL (2001) Compliant mechanisms. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Howell LL, Midha A, Norton TW (1996) Evaluation of equivalent spring stiffness for use in a pseudo-rigid-body model of large-deflection compliant mechanisms. ASME J Mech Des 118:125–131Google Scholar
  11. Jackson TP, Sachs EM, Cima MJ (1998) Modeling and designing components with locally controlled composition. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, 10–12 August 1998Google Scholar
  12. Malloy RA (1994) Plastic part design for injection molding: an introduction. Hanser Gardner, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  13. Maniscalco M (2004) Basic elements: simplifying multicomponent design. IMM Magazine (online version). 3
  14. Pirkl JD (1998) Automating the multi-component molding process. In: Proceedings of Technologies for Multi-material Injection Molding (CM98–206), Troy, MI, May 1998Google Scholar
  15. Plank H (2002) Overmolding-stack-mold technology: an innovative concept in multi-component injection molding. SME Technical Papers (CM02–225)Google Scholar
  16. Priyadarshi A, Gupta SK (2004) Geometric algorithms for automated design of multi-piece permanent molds. Comput Aided Des 36(3):241–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rotheiser J (2004) Joining of plastics, handbook for designers and engineers. Hanser Gardner, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  18. van Krevelen DW (1990) Properties of polymers. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Vogel S (1995) Better bent than broken. Discover 16(5):62–67Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Regina M. Gouker
    • 1
  • Satyandra K. Gupta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hugh A. Bruck
    • 1
  • Tobias Holzschuh
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations