Efficient warpage optimization of thin shell plastic parts using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm

  • Hasan KurtaranEmail author
  • Tuncay Erzurumlu
Original Article


During the production of thin shell plastic parts by injection molding, warpage depending on the process conditions is often encountered. In this study, efficient minimization of warpage on thin shell plastic parts by integrating finite element (FE) analysis, statistical design of experiment method, response surface methodology (RSM), and genetic algorithm (GA) is investigated. A bus ceiling lamp base is considered as a thin shell plastic part example. To achieve the minimum warpage, optimum process condition parameters are determined. Mold temperature, melt temperature, packing pressure, packing time, and cooling time are considered as process condition parameters. FE analyses are conducted for a combination of process parameters organized using statistical three-level full factorial experimental design. The most important process parameters influencing warpage are determined using FE analysis results based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) method. A predictive response surface model for warpage data is created using RSM. The response surface (RS) model is interfaced with an effective GA to find the optimum process parameter values.


Analysis of variance Design of experiment  Genetic algorithm Injection molding Response surface methodology Thin shell plastic Warpage optimization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Yuanxian GU, Haimei LI, Changyo S (2001) Numerical simulation of thermally induced stress and warpage in injection-molded thermoplastics. Adv Polym Technol 20(2):14–21Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lui SJ (1995) Modeling and simulation of thermally induced stress and warpage in injection molded thermoplastics. Polym Eng Sci 35:1511–1517Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bushko WC, Stokes VK (1995) Solidification of thermoviscoelastic melts, part II: effect of processing conditions on shrinkage and residual stress. Polym Eng Sci 35:365–370Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jacques MST (1982) Analysis of thermal warpage in injection molded flat parts due to unbalanced cooling. Polym Eng Sci 22:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matsuoka T, Takabatake J, Koiwai A, Inoue Y, Yamamoto S, Takahashi H (1991) Integrated simulation to predict warpage of injection molded parts. Polym Eng Sci 31:1043–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang MC, Tai CC (2001) The effective factors in the warpage problem of an injection-molded part with a thin shell feature. J Mater Process Technol 110:1–9CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee BH, Kim BH (1995) Optimization of part wall thicknesses to reduce warpage of injection-molded parts based on the modified complex method. Polym Plast Technol Eng 34(5):793–811Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    MoldFlow Corporation (2001) MoldFlow Plastic Insight 3.0. Moldflow Corporation, Wayland, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995) Response surface methodology process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    David G (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Design and Manufacturing EngineeringGebze Institute of TechnologyGebze/KocaeliTurkey

Personalised recommendations