Advertisement

Improved dynamic cutting force model in peripheral milling. Part II: experimental verification and prediction

  • X.-W. Liu
  • K. ChengEmail author
  • D. Webb
  • A.P. Longstaff
  • M.H. Widiyarto
Original Article

Abstract

Cutting trials reveal that a measure of cutter run-out is always unavoidable in peripheral milling. This paper improves and extends the dynamic cutting force model of peripheral milling based on the theoretical analytical model presented in Part I [1], by taking into account the influence of the cutter run-out on the undeformed chip thickness. A set of slot milling tests with a single-fluted helical end-mill was carried out at different feed rates, while the 3D cutting force coefficients were calibrated using the averaged cutting forces. The measured and predicted cutting forces were compared using the experimentally identified force coefficients. The results indicate that the model provides a good prediction when the feed rate is limited to a specified interval, and the recorded cutting force curves give a different trend compared to other published results [8]. Subsequently, a series of peripheral milling tests with different helical end-mill were performed at different cutting parameters to validate the proposed dynamic cutting force model, and the cutting conditions were simulated and compared with the experimental results. The result demonstrates that only when the vibration between the cutter and workpiece is faint, the predicted and measured cutting forces are in good agreement.

Keywords

3D Cutting force Dynamic Experiment  Peripheral milling Prediction Verification  

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu X-W, Cheng K, Webb D (2002) Improved dynamic cutting force model in peripheral milling. Part I: Theoretical model and simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20(9):631–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bayoumi AE, Yucesan G, Kendall LA (1994) An analytic mechanistic cutting force model for milling operations: a theory and methodology. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 116:324–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Budak E, Altintas Y, Armarego EJA (1996) Prediction of milling force coefficients from orthogonal cutting data. Trans ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 118(2):216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kolarits FM, DeVries WR (1991) A mechanistic dynamic model of end milling for process controller simiulation. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 113:176–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elbestawi MA, Ismail F, Du R, Ullagaddi BC (1994) Modelling machining dynamics including damping in the tool-workpiece interface. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 116:435–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ismail F, Elbestawi MA, Du R, Urbasik K (1993) Generation of milled surface including tool dynamics and wear. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 115:245–252Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Montgomery D, Altintas Y (1991) Mechanism of cutting force and surface generation in dynamic milling. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 113:160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yucesan GB, Altintas Y (1994) Improved modelling of cutting force coefficients in peripheral milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 34(4):473–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith S, Tlusty J (1991) An overview of modeling and simulation of the milling process. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 113:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Melkote SN, Endres WJ (1998) The importance of including size effect when modeling slot milling. Trans ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 120:68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yun W-S, Cho D-W (2000) An improved method for the determination of 3D cutting force coefficients and runout parameters in end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16:851–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shaw MC (1984) Metal cutting principles. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oxley PLB (1989) The mechanics of machining. Ellis Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • X.-W. Liu
    • 1
  • K. Cheng
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Webb
    • 1
  • A.P. Longstaff
    • 2
  • M.H. Widiyarto
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EngineeringLeeds Metropolitan UniversityLeedsUK
  2. 2.Ultra Precision Engineering CentreUniversity of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations