Advertisement

The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 62, Issue 3, pp 681–713 | Cite as

Local and social: entrepreneurs, information network effects, and economic growth

  • Tessa ConroyEmail author
  • Stephan Weiler
Original Paper
  • 127 Downloads

Abstract

Information is an essential input to the entrepreneurial process. Information based on the trials of past entrepreneurial projects can be particularly useful as it reveals details about the local market, benefiting subsequent ventures. Through a formal model of entrepreneurial search characterized by information flows and networks, we hypothesize a diminishing returns relationship between entrepreneurial information, in the form of births and deaths of entrepreneurial projects and economic benefits in the form of employment growth. We leverage the natural experiment contexts of regional economies to explore the role of information as it varies across market scale. In addition, given that networks, an important channel for information, are most powerful and effective in localized settings, we use the regional socio-demographic variation to explore the role of networks defined by gender. We indeed find statistically and economically significant evidence for the information-growth relationship in terms of both market scale and gender, with larger positive employment effects in less dynamic markets and less-networked market contexts. After building the empirical case for the importance of information flows and networks, we conclude with policy implications with particular attention to broadening and deepening entrepreneurial ecosystems.

JEL Classification

R23 L26 J16 

Notes

References

  1. Acs ZJ, Armington C (2006) Entrepreneurship, geography, and American economic growth. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akerlof G (1970) The market for “lemons”: quality and uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84(3):488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Q J Econ 115(August):715–753.  https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554881 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alon T, Berger D, Dent R, Pugsley B (2018) Older and slower: the startup deficit’s lasting effects on aggregate productivity growth. J Monet Econ 93:68–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersson M, Noseleit F (2011) Start-ups and employment dynamics within and across sectors. Small Bus Econ 36(4):461–483.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9252-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baptista R, Escária V, Madruga P (2008) Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal. Small Bus Econ 30(1):49–58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9055-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beeson PE, DeJong DN, Troesken W (2001) Population growth in U.S. counties, 1840–1990. Reg Sci Urban Econ 31(6):669–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunten D, Weiler S, Thompson EC, Zahran S (2015) Entrepreneurship, information, and growth. J Reg Sci 00:1–25Google Scholar
  9. Burt RS (2000) The network entrepreneur. In: Swedberg R (ed) Entrepreneurship: the social science view. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 281–307Google Scholar
  10. Conroy T, Weiler S (2015) Where are the women entrepreneurs? Business ownership growth by gender across the American urban landscape. Econ Inq 53(4):1872–1892.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conroy T, Weiler S (2016) Does gender matter for job creation? Business ownership and employment growth. Small Bus Econ 47(2):397–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deller SC, Tsai T-HS, Marcouiller DW, English DBK (2001) The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. Am J Agric Econ 83(2):352–365.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elfring T, Hulsink W (2003) Networks in entrepreneurship: the case of high-technology firms. Small Bus Econ 21:409–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. Wash Mon 34(5):15–25Google Scholar
  15. Fritsch M, Mueller P (2004) Effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Reg Stud 38(8):961–975.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Granovetter M (2005) The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J Econ Perspect 19(1):33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenwald BE, Weiss JES, Weiss A (1984) Informational imperfections in the capital market and macroeconomic fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 74(2):194–199Google Scholar
  18. Haines MR (2010) Historical, demographic, economic, and social data: the United States, 1790–2002. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor (ICPSR02896-v3) Google Scholar
  19. Haltiwanger J, Jarmin RS, Miranda J (2013) Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Rev Econ Stat 15(2):347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henderson J, Weiler S (2009) Entrepreneurs and job growth: probing the boundaries of time and space. Econ Dev Q 24(1):23–32.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242409350917 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang TL, Orazem PF, Wohlgemuth D (2002) Rural population growth, 1950–1990: the roles of human capital, industry structure, and government policy. Am J Agric Econ 84:615–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leyden DP, Link AN, Siegel DS (2014) A theoretical analysis of the role of social networks in entrepreneurship. Res Policy 43(7):1157–1163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Low S, Weiler S (2012) Employment risk, returns, and entrepreneurship. Econ Dev Q 26(3):238–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGranahan D, Wojan T (2007) Recasting the creative class to examine growth processes in rural and urban counties. Reg Stud 41(2):197–216.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600928285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McManus MJ (2017) Women’s business ownership: data from the 2012 survey of business owners. U.S. Small Business Administration. Issue Brief (13):1–17Google Scholar
  26. McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L (1982) Women and weak ties: differences by sex in the size of voluntary organizations A. Am J Sociol 87(4):883–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann Rev Sociol 27:415–444.  https://doi.org/10.1109/cfis.2015.7391644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Partridge MD, Rickman DS, Ali K, Olfert MR (2009) Do new economic geography agglomeration shadows underlie current population dynamics across the urban hierarchy? Pap Reg Sci 88(2):445–466.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00211.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rappaport J (2007) Moving to nice weather. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37:375–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roback J (1982) Wages, rents, and the quality of life. J Polit Econ 90(6):1257–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roper S, Love JH, Bonner K (2017) Firms’ knowledge search and local knowledge externalities in innovation performance. Res Policy 46(1):43–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sander W (1992) The effect of women’s schooling on fertility. Econ Lett 40(1992):229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saxenian A (1994) Regional Advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Stephens HM, Partridge MD (2011) Do entrepreneurs enhance economic growth in lagging regions? Growth Change 42(4):431–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stephens HM, Partridge MD, Faggian A (2013) Innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth in lagging regions. J Reg Sci 53(5):778–812.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stiglitz JE, Weiss A (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. Am Econ Rev 71(3):393–410Google Scholar
  37. Stiglitz JE, Weiss A (1983) Incentive effects of terminations: applications to the credit and labor markets. Am Econ Rev 73(5):912–927Google Scholar
  38. Thompson EC, Hammond GW, Weiler S (2006) Amenities, local conditions, and fiscal determinants of factor growth in rural America (The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City working paper RWP-06-08). http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=912797. Accessed 17 May 2013
  39. Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q 42:35–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Praag CM, Versloot PH (2007) What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Bus Econ 29(4):351–382.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9074-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weiler S (2000) Pioneers and settlers in Lo-Do Denver: private risk and public benefits in urban redevelopment. Urban Stud 37(1):167–179.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098002348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weiler S (2006) A park by any other name: National Park designation as a natural experiment in signaling. J Urban Econ 60(1):96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weiler S, Bernasek A (2001) Dodging the glass ceiling? Networks and the new wave of women entrepreneurs. Soc Sci J 38:85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weiler S, Hoag D, Fan C-M (2006) Prospecting for economic returns to research: adding informational value at the market fringe. J Reg Sci 46(2):289–311.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4146.2006.00442.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Applied EconomicsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison/ExtensionMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations