Advertisement

The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 113–137 | Cite as

Crime and natural resource booms: evidence from unconventional natural gas production

  • Timothy M. Komarek
Original Paper
  • 190 Downloads

Abstract

The USA has experienced a sudden expansion of oil and natural gas production due to the combination of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. The energy extraction boom has had many localized impacts, most notably in areas with substantial shale gas reserves. This paper exploits a natural experiment in the Marcellus region to examine one channel of the so-called resource curse, the effect of resource extraction on local crime. The results show that areas experiencing a natural gas extraction boom suffer an increase in overall violent crimes, while property crimes remain similar to non-boom areas. Furthermore, the violent crime increase appears to be driven primarily by increases in aggravated and sexual assaults.

JEL Classification

Q33 R11 K42 

Supplementary material

168_2018_861_MOESM1_ESM.dta (399 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (dta 399 KB)
168_2018_861_MOESM2_ESM.do (13 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (do 13 KB)

References

  1. Allcott H, Keniston D (2014) Dutch disease or agglomeration? The local economic effects of natural resource booms in modern America. NBER Working Paper No. 20508Google Scholar
  2. Angrist J, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricists companion. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Archbold CA (2013) Policing the patch: an examination of the impact of the oil boom on small town policing and crime in western North Dakota. North Dakota State University, FargoGoogle Scholar
  4. Arellano M (1987) Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 49:431–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartik T (1991) Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?. W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, KalamazooCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker G (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76:169–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black D, McKinnsh T, Sanders S (2005a) The economic impact of the coal boom and bust. Econ J 115:449–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black D, McKinnsh T, Sanders S (2005b) Tight labor markets and the demand for education: evidence from the coal boom and bust. Ind Labor Relat Rev 59(1):3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown JP (2014) Production of natural gas from shale in local economies: a resource blessing or curse? Econ Rev 99(1):5–33Google Scholar
  10. Brown JP, Fitzgerald T, Weber JG (2016) Capturing rents from natural resource abundance: private royalties from US onshore oil & gas production. Resour Energy Econ 46:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burbidge JB, Magee L, Robb AL (1988) Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable. J Am Stat Assoc 83:123–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrington K, Pereira M (2011) Assessing the social impacts of the resources boom on rural communities. Rural Soc 21:2–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cascio EU, Narayan A (2015) Who needs a fracking education? The educational response to low-skill biased technological change, NBER Working Paper 21359Google Scholar
  14. Corden WM, Neary JP (1982) Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy. Econ J 92:825–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cotti CD, Walker DM (2010) The impact of casinos on fatal alcohol-related traffic accidents in the United States. J Health Econ 29:788–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deller SC, Deller MA (2010) Rural crime and social capital. Growth Change 41(2):221–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dobbs E (2013) The new oil landscape. National Geographic. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/bakken-shale-oil/dobb-text
  18. Eligon J (2013) An oil town where men are many, and women are hounded. New York Times, January 15. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/16/us/16women.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
  19. Fitzgerald T (2013) Frackonomics: some economics of hydraulic fracturing. Case West Reserve Law Rev 63(4):1337–1361Google Scholar
  20. Food and Water Watch (2013) The social cost of fracking. http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/reports/the-social-costs-of-fracking/
  21. Gazel RC, Rickman DS, Thompson WN (2001) Casino gambling and crime: a panel study of Wisconsin counties. Manag Decis Econ 22(1–3):65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gould ED, Weinberg BA, Mustard DB (2002) Crime rates and local labor market opportunities in the United States: 1977–1997. Rev Econ Stat 84(1):45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grinols EL, Mustard DB (2006) Casinos, crime, and community costs. Rev Econ Stat 88(1):28–45Google Scholar
  24. Haggerty J, Guide PH, Delorey M, Rasker R (2014) Long-term effects of income specialization in oil and gas extraction: the U.S. West, 1980–2011. Energy Econ 45:186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hardy K, Kelsey TW (2015) Local income related to Marcellus shale activity in Pennsylvania. Commun Dev 46(4):329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horwitz S (2014) Dark side of the boom. Washington Post, September 28. http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2014/09/28/dark-side-of-the-boom/
  27. Jacobsen GD, Parker DP (2016) The economic aftermath of resource booms: evidence from boomtowns in the American West. Econ J 126(593):1092–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacquet J (2009) Energy boomtowns and natural gas: implications for Marcellus Shale local governments and rural communities. NERCRD Rural Development Paper No. 43Google Scholar
  29. James A, Smith B (2017) There will be blood: crime rates in shale-rich U.S. counties. J Environ Econ Manag 84:125–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelly M (2000) Inequality and crime. Rev Econ Stat 82:530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Komarek TM (2016) Labor market dynamics and the unconventional natural gas boom: evidence from the Marcellus region. Resour Energy Econ 45:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kowalski L, Zajac G (2012) A preliminary examination of Marcellus shale drilling activity and crime trends in Pennsylvania. Justice Center for Research, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  33. Levitt S (2001) Alternative strategies for identifying the link between unemployment and crime. J Quant Criminol 17(4):377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luthra AD, Bankston WB, Kalich DAM, Forsyth CJ (2007) Economic fluctuation and crime: a time series analysis of the effects of oil development in the coastal regions of Louisiana. Deviant Behav 28:113–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maniloff P, Mastromonaco R (2017) The local employment impacts of fracking: a national study. Resour Energy Econ 49:62–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCollister KE, French MT, Fang H (2010) The cost of crime to society: new crime-specific estimates for policy and program evaluation. Drug Alcohol Depend 108:89–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Michaels G (2010) The long term consequences of resource-based specialization. Econ J 121(551):31–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paredes D, Komarek T, Loveridge S (2015) Income and employment effects of shale gas extraction windfalls: evidence from the Marcellus region. Energy Econ 47:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rabe BG, Borick C (2013) Conventional politics for unconventional drilling? Lessons from Pennsylvania’s early move into fracking policy development. Rev Policy Res 30(3):321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rickman DS, Wang H, Winters JV (2017) Is shale development drilling holes in the human capital pipeline? Energy Econ 62(C):283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruddell R (2011) Boomtown policing: responding to the dark side of resource development. Policing 5:328–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruddell R, Ortiz NR, Thomas MO (2013) Boomtown blues: economic development, crime and decreased quality of life. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruddell R, Jayasundara DS, Mayzer R, Heitkamp T (2014) Drilling down: an examination of the boom-crime relationship in resource based boom counties. West Criminol Rev 15(1):3–17Google Scholar
  44. Sachs JD, Warner AM (2001) The curse of natural resources. Eur Econ Rev 45:827–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shepard SE (2013) Wildcatting: a Stripper’s guide to the modern American boomtown. Buzzfeed.com. http://www.buzzfeed.com/susanelizabethshepard/wildcatting-a-strippers-guide-to-the-modern-american-boomtow
  46. Solon G, Haider SJ, Wooldridge JM (2013) What are we weighting for? NBER Working Paper No. 18859Google Scholar
  47. van der Ploeg F (2011) Natural resources: curse or blessing? J Econ Lit 49(2):366–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weber JG (2012) The effect of a natural gas boom on employment and income in Colorado, Texas and Wyoming. Energy Econ 34:1580–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weber JG (2014) A decade of natural gas development: making of a resource curse? Resour Energy Econ 37:168–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White NE (2012) A tale of two shale plays. Rev Reg Stud 42:107–119Google Scholar
  51. Wrenn DH, Kelsey TW, Jaenicke EC (2015) Local and non-local employment impacts associated with Marcellus shale development in Pennsylvania. Agric Resour Econ Rev 44(2):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Old Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations