Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regional economic resilience: the experience of the Italian local labor systems

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After defining the concept of resilience and its application to the regional context, the paper presents a preliminary evaluation of regional economic resilience in the case of the Italian regions. In doing so, we follow the approach by Martin (J Econ Geogr 12:1–32, 2012) and Martin and Sunley (2015) who identify three different dimensions to regional economic resilience: (a) resistance, i.e., the degree of sensitivity or depth of reaction of a regional economy to a recessionary shock; (b) recovery, i.e., the speed and magnitude of the recovery; (c) reorientation and renewal, i.e., the ability of a region to adapt in response to the shock and renew its growth path. The analysis is conducted at the local labor systems (LLS) geographical level and focuses, at this stage, only on the first two dimensions of resilience, i.e., resistance and recovery. The recessionary shock (2009–2010) is defined following the Italian National Statistical Institute approach for which a recession implies a decrease in GDP for three consecutive trimesters. The pre-recessionary period is 2007–2008 and the recovery period 2011 (as a new recession started again in Italy at the end of 2011). The results clearly point at very heterogeneous resilience for the Italian LLS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a more detailed definition of the methodology used, see ISTAT (1997).

  2. The original formula in Martin (2012, p. 16) is actually (\(\Delta {E}_\mathrm{r}/ {E}_\mathrm{r})/ (\Delta {E}_\mathrm{N}/{E}_\mathrm{N})\). However, the formula does not match what Martin himself reports in the same paper in Table 5, p. 22. A ratio between percentage change as the one in the formula above can have both negative and positive value and it is not centered around the value of 1, while the values reported in Table 5 seem to be centered around 1 and are all positive (this is possible, but seems a bit implausible). Hence, we modified the formula to match the “sensitivity index” values reported by Martin (2012) in Table 5.

  3. Summary statistics on the explanatory variables are in Appendix, Table 3.

  4. While deep lags would be ideal, because of the shifting LLS boundaries, this is not possible without intensive manual aggregation of the data to reconstruct consistent areas.

  5. The Hausman test for IIA supports the IIA hypothesis for all categories. Although a variance inflation factor (VIF) cannot be calculated for a nonlinear model, we ran an OLS model and test for multicollinearity of the regressors. None of the regressors was multicollinear—with a maximum VIF of 2.75 (for one of the regional fixed effects) and an average of 1.69.

References

  • Anderies JM (2015) Managing variance: key policy challenges for the Anthropocene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(47):14402–14403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderies JM, Folke C, Walker B, Ostrom E (2013) Aligning key concepts for global change policy: robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecol Soc 18(2):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustine N, Wolman H, Wial H et al (2013) Regional economic capacity, economic shocks and economic resilience. MacArthur foundation network on building resilient regions. Working paper

  • Balland PA, Rigby D, Boschma R (2015) The technological resilience of US cities. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 8(2):167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R (2015) Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Reg Stud 49:733–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camagni R, Capello R (2015) Second-rank city dynamics: theoretical interpretations behind their growth potentials. Eur Plan Stud 23(6):1041–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter A (2015) Resilience in the social and physical realms: lessons from the gulf coast. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct Part 3(14):290–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel M (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8):765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellini R, Torrisi G (2014) Regional resilience in Italy: a very long-run analysis. Reg Stud 48(11):1779–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombes M, Casado-Dìaz JM, Martinez-Bernabeu L, Carausu F (2012) Study on comparable Labour Market Areas, EUROSTAT

  • Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18(4):598–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi S, Porter L (2012) Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? Plan Theory Pract 13(2):299–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Caro P (2017) Testing and explaining economic resilience with an application to Italian regions. Papers in Regional Science 96:93–113. doi:10.1111/pirs.12168

  • Dijkstra L, Garcilazo E, McCann P (2015) The effects of the global financial crisis on European regions and cities. J Econ Geogr 15:935–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl M (2014) Regional resilience and fat tails: a stochastic analysis of firm growth rate distributions of German regions. Marburg geography, working paper on innovation and space, 1.14

  • Fingleton B, Garretsen H, Martin R (2012) Recessionary shocks and regional employment. J Reg Sci 52:109–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster K, Pendall R, Cowell M (2010) Regional resilience: building understanding of the metaphor. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 3(1):71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassink R (2010) Regional resilience: a promising concept to explain differences in regional economic adaptability? Camb J Reg Econ Soc 3(1):45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill EW, Wial H, Wolman H (2008) Exploring regional economic resilience. Working paper 2008–04, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley

  • Hill E, St Clair T, Wial H, Wolman H, Atkins P, Blumenthal P, Ficenec S, Friedhoff A (2012) Economic shocks and regional economic resilience. Build Resil Reg Urban Reg Policy Eff 4:193–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological system. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin E, Campbell J, Wilson R, Faggian A, Moore R, Irwin N (2016) Human adaptations in food, energy, and water systems. J Environ Stud Sci 6(1):127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT (1997) I sistemi locali del lavoro 1991, Roma, pp 19–26

  • ISTAT (2005) I sistemi locali del lavoro. Censimento 2001. Dati definitivi, Roma. http://dawinci.istat.it/MD/download/sll_comunic_solo_testo.pdf

  • Jara B, Faggian A (forthcoming) Labor market resilience and re-orientation in disaster scenarios In: Baycan T, Pinto H (eds) Regional resilience. Springer

  • Lagravinese R (2015) Economic crisis and rising gaps North–South: evidence from the Italian regions. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 8:331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon D, Derickson KD (2013) From resilience to resourcefulness: a critique of resilience policy and activism. Prog Hum Geogr 37(2):253–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mameli F, Faggian A, McCann P (2008) Employment growth in italian local labour systems: issues of model specification and sectoral aggregation. Spat Econ Anal 3(3):343–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R (2012) Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. J Econ Geogr 12:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, Sunley P (2015) On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation. J Econ Geogr 15(1):1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1978) Quantitative methods for analyzing travel behaviour on individuals: some recent developments. In: Hensher D, Stopher P (eds) Behavioural travel modelling. Croom Helm London, London, pp 279–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe JS, Foster J, Ramlogan R (2006) Adaptive economic growth. Camb J Econ 30(1):7–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Modica M, Reggiani A (2014) An alternative interpretation of regional resilience: evidence from Italy. In: ERSA conference papers (no. ersa14p369). European Regional Science Association

  • Mollenkopf J, Pastor M (2013) Struggling over strangers or receiving with resilience? The metropolitics of immigrant integration. Working paper by the MacArthur foundation network on building resilient regions. University of California, Berkeley

  • Parkinson M, Meegan R, Karecha J (2015) City size and economic performance: is bigger better, small more beautiful or middling marvellous? Eur Plan Stud 23(6):1054–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reggiani A, de Graaff T, Nijkamp P (2002) Resilience: an evolutionary approach to spatial economic systems. Netw Spat Econ 2:211–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose A, Liao S-Y (2005) Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: a computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions. J Reg Sci 45:75–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrieb K, Norris H, Galea S (2010) Measuring capacities for community resilience. Soc Indic Res 99(2):227–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanstrom T (2008) Regional resilience: a critical examination of the ecological framework. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Faggian.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Summary statistics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faggian, A., Gemmiti, R., Jaquet, T. et al. Regional economic resilience: the experience of the Italian local labor systems. Ann Reg Sci 60, 393–410 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0822-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0822-9

JEL Classification

Navigation