The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 623–640 | Cite as

Are there different local patterns of convergence concealed beneath the regional level? An analysis for US states and counties using a multilevel approach

  • Alberto Díaz Dapena
  • Fernando Rubiera Morollón
  • Dusan Paredes Araya
Original Paper
  • 214 Downloads

Abstract

The extensive literature on economic convergence has explored a wide variety of ways of measuring convergence in addition to finely tuning and improving the applicable econometric techniques. However, very few contributions analyze the relevance of the spatial level of analysis. Our hypothesis is that studying the convergence at the level of large regions (states) could conceal intraregional heterogeneity. This hypothesis is consistent with the New Economic Geography framework, which highlighted core-periphery patterns at the local level. However, this polarization mechanism may become difficult to identify with aggregated data or neoclassical dynamics operating at the same time. This paper proposes a multilevel approach to study this question. It allows the identification of possible heterogeneous local patterns of behavior within regions. It is applied to the US economy in a hierarchy of two levels: states and counties. The results show high intraclass correlation, indicating significant variance within states. An overall pattern of convergence is observed in line with previous results, although some states present internal patterns of divergence or significant changes in the rate of convergence.

JEL Classification

R11 R15 O47 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by H2020 European Research Council (Grant No. UE-16-726950-IMAJINE); Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (Grant No. MINECO-13-ECO2013-48161-R); Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica (Grant No. FPU Program).

References

  1. Abreu M, Groot H De, Florax RJGM (2005) A meta-analysis of \(\beta \)-convergence: the legendary 2%. J Econ Surv 19(3):389–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexiadis S (2013) Convergence clubs and spatial externalities, models and applications of regional convergence in Europe. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson L, Hammarstedt M, Hussain S, Shukur G (2013) Ethnic origin, local labour markets and self-employment in Sweden: a multilevel approach. The annals of regional science 50(3):885–910Google Scholar
  4. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anselin L, Florax RJGM (1995) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anselin L, Rey SJ (1997) Introduction to the special issue on spatial econometrics. Int Reg Sci Rev 20(1–2):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arbia G, Petrarca F (2011) Effects of MAUP on spatial econometric models. Lett Spat Resour Sci 4(3):173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aslam A, Corrado L (2012) The geography of well-being. J Econ Geogr 12(3):627–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barro RJ, Sala-I-Martin X, Blanchard OJ, Hall RE (1991) Convergence across states and regions. Brook Pap Econ Act 1:107–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baumol WJ (1986) Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare what the long-run data show. Am Econ Rev 76:1072–1085Google Scholar
  12. Bernard AB, Durlauf SN (1995) Convergence in international output. J Appl Econom 10(2):97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bullen N, Jones K, Duncan C (1997) Modelling complexity: analysing between-individual and between-place variation-a multilevel tutorial. Environ Plan A 29(4):585–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlino G, Mills L (1996) Convergence and the US States: a time-series analysis. J Reg Sci 36(4):597–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caselli F, Esquivel G, Lefort F (1996) Reopening the convergence debate: a new look at cross-country growth empirics. J Econ Growth 1(3):363–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen PN (1998) Black concentration effects on black–white and gender inequality: multilevel analysis for US metropolitan areas. Soc Forces 77(1):207–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coulombe S, Lee FC (1993) Regional productivity convergence in Canada. University of Ottawa, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  18. De la Fuente A (2002) On the sources of convergence: a close look at the Spanish regions. Eur Econ Rev 46(3):569–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Díaz-Dapena A, Fernández-Vázquez E, Rubiera-Morollón F (2016) The role of spatial scale in regional convergence: the effect of MAUP in the estimation of beta-convergence equations. Ann Reg Sci 56(2):473–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G (1998) Context, composition and heterogeneity: using multilevel models in health research. Soc Sci Med 46(1):97–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Durlauf SN, Kourtellos A, Minkin A (2001) The local Solow growth model. Eur Econ Rev 45:928–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Durlauf SN, Johnson PA, Temple J (2005) Growth econometrics. In: Aghion P, Durlauf SN (eds) Handbook of economics growth (part 1), vol 1. North-Holland Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  23. Easterlin R (1960) Interregional differences in per capita income, population, and total income, 1840–1950. In: Trends in the American economy in the nineteenth century, pp 73–140Google Scholar
  24. Ertur C, Koch W (2007) Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: theory and evidence. J Appl Econom 22:1.033–1.062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ertur C, Le Gallo J, Baumont C (2006) The European regional convergence process, 1980–1995: do spatial regimes and spatial dependence matter? Int Reg Sci Rev 29:3–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fujita M, Thisse J (2013) Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location, and globalization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A (2001) The spatial economy: cities, regions, and international trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Ganong P, Shoag D (2012) Why has regional convergence in the U.S. stopped?. Hardvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Gehlke CE, Biehl K (1934) Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation coefficient in census tract material. J Am Stat Assoc 29(185):169–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldstein H (1986) Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares. Biometrika 73(1):43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldstein H (2011) Multilevel statistical models. Willey, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldstein H, Healy M (1995) The graphical presentation of a collection of means. J R Stat Soc Ser A (Stat Soc) 158(1):175–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Higgins MJ, Levy D, Young A (2006) Growth and convergence across the United States: evidence from county-level data. Rev Econ Stat 88(4):671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen HS (1988) Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56:1371–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoover EM (1971) An introduction to regional economics. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Hox J (2010) Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  37. Islam N (1995) Growth empirics: a panel data approach. Q J Econ 110(443):1127–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Islam N (2003) What have we learnt from the convergence debate? J Econ Surv 17(3):309–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koo J, Kim YY, Kim S (1998) Regional income converge: evidence from a rapidly growing economy. J Econ Dev 23(2):191–203Google Scholar
  40. Krugman P (1987) The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: notes on trade in the presence of dynamic scale economies. J Dev Econ 27(1):41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Krugman P, Venables AJ (1995) Globalization and the Inequality of Nations. Q J Econ 110(4):857–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28Google Scholar
  44. Li Y, Wei D (2010) The spatial-temporal hierarchy of regional inequality of China. Appl Geogr 30:303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lim U (2016) Regional income club convergence in US BEA economic areas: a spatial switching regression approach. Ann Reg Sci 56(1):273–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Magrini S (2004) Regional (di)convergence. Handb Reg Urban Econ 4:2741–2796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107(2):407–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller JR, Genc I (2005) Alternative regional specification and convergence of U.S. regional growth rates. Ann Reg Sci 39:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. Concepts and techniques in modern geography. GeoBooks. Headley Brothers Ltd. Kent, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  50. Openshaw S, Taylor PJ (1979) A million or so correlation coefficients: three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In: Wrigley N (ed) Statistical applications in the spatial sciences. Pion, London, pp 127–144Google Scholar
  51. Quah D (1992) International patterns of growth I: Persistence in cross-country disparities. Working paper LSEGoogle Scholar
  52. Ramajo J, Márquez MA, Hewings G, Salinas MM (2008) Spatial heterogeneity and interregional spillovers in the European Union: do cohesion policies encourage convergence across regions? Eur Econ Rev 52:551–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Resende GM (2011) Multiple dimensions of regional economic growth: the Brazilian case, 1991–2000. Pap Reg Sci 90(3):629–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Resende GM, de Carvalho AXY, Sakowski PAM, Cravo TA (2016) Evaluating multiple spatial dimensions of economic growth in Brazil using spatial panel data models. Ann Reg Sci 56(1):1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rey S, Mountouri BD (1999) US regional income convergence: a spatial econometrics perspective. Reg Stud 33(2):143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sala-i-Martin X (1994) Cross-sectional regressions and the empirics of economic growth. Eur Econ Rev 38(3):739–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Srholec M (2010) A multilevel approach to geography of innovation. Reg Stud 44(9):1207–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shioji E (1992) Regional growth in Japan. Yale University, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  59. Solow R (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Rev Econ Stat 39:312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tsionas EG (2000) Regional growth and convergence: evidence from the United States. Reg Stud 34(3):231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williamson JG (1965) Regional inequality and the process of national development: a description of the patterns. Econ Dev Cult Change 13(4):1–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Díaz Dapena
    • 1
  • Fernando Rubiera Morollón
    • 1
  • Dusan Paredes Araya
    • 2
  1. 1.Regional Economics Laboratory - REGIOlabUniversity of OviedoOviedoSpain
  2. 2.Universidad Católica del NorteAntofagastaChile

Personalised recommendations