The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 119–134 | Cite as

A hierarchical SLX model application to violent crime in Mexico

  • Donald J. Lacombe
  • Miguel Flores
Original Paper


In this paper, we develop a Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial Lag of X (SLX) spatial econometric model to examine the relationship between contextual factors associated with violence levels in Mexico over the period 2005–2010, a period in which violence in the country reached record levels. We provide local spillover estimates of relevant covariates at both levels of the hierarchy, i.e., the municipal and state levels in Mexico. We also provide a methodology to compare relevant models regarding the proper specification of the spatial weight matrix in these models.

JEL Classification

C11 C21 C30 


  1. Chamlin MB, Cochran JK (2005) Ascribed economic inequality and homicide among modern societies toward the development of a cross-national theory. Homicide Stud 9(1):3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castillo JC, Mejía D, Restrepo P (2013) Illegal drug markets and violence in Mexico: The causes beyond Calderón, Versión electronica. 3 Oct 2013
  3. Dell M (2015) Trafficking networks and the Mexican drug war. Am Econ Rev 105(5):178–179Google Scholar
  4. Dube A, Dube O, García-Ponce O (2013) Cross-border spillover: US gun laws and violence in Mexico. Am Pol Sci Rev 107(03):397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dube O, Garcia-Ponce O, Thom K (2014) From maize to haze: agricultural shocks and the growth of the mexican drug sector. Center for global development, Working paper 355Google Scholar
  6. Escalante F, Alvarado A, Serrano M (2010) Panorama del homicidio en México. Esquema de análisis territorial 1990–2007, XV Seguridad nacional y seguridad interior. Los grandes problemas de México. México, DF: El Colegio de México, pp 301–30Google Scholar
  7. Fajnzlber P, Lederman D, Loayza N (2002) Inequality and violent crime. JL Econ 45:1Google Scholar
  8. Fajnzylber P, Lederman D, Loayza N (1998) Determinants of crime rates in Latin America and the world: an empirical assessment. World Bank Publications, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flores M, Rodriguez-Oreggia E (2014) Spillover effects on homicides across Mexican municipalities: a spatial regime model approach. Rev Reg Stud 44(3):241–262Google Scholar
  10. Freeman R (1995) The labor market. In: Wilson J, Petersilia J (eds) Crime: public policies for crime control. ICS Press, San Francisco, CA, pp 171–192Google Scholar
  11. Freeman RB (1996) Why do so many young American men commit crimes and what might we do about it? J Econ Perspect 10(1):25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodman C, Marizco M (2010) US firearms trafficking to Mexico: new data and insights illuminate key trends and challenges, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Mexico Institute and University of San Diego Trans-Border Institute, Working Paper Series on US-Mexico Security CooperationGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobs D, Richardson AM (2008) Economic inequality and homicide in the developed nations from 1975 to 1995. Homicide Stud 12(1):28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. LeSage JP (2014) What regional scientists need to know about spatial econometrics, Available at SSRN 2420725Google Scholar
  15. LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. LeSage JP, Pace RK (2014) The biggest myth in spatial econometrics. Econometrics 2(4):217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lochner L, Moretti E (2004) The effect of education on crime: evidence from prison inmates, arrests, and self-reports. Am Econ Rev 94(1):155–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Messner SF, Raffalovich LE, Sutton GM (2010) Poverty, infant mortality, and homicide rates in cross-national perpsective: assessments of criterion and construct validity. Criminology 48(2):509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Osorio J (2012) Democratization and Drug violence in Mexico. Conflict and Violence at Yale University, Program on OrderGoogle Scholar
  20. Osorio J (2013) The contagion of drug violence: spatio-temporal dynamics of the mexican war on drugs. Working paper, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Payan T (2006) The three US-Mexico border wars: drugs, immigration, and homeland security. Greenwood Publishing Group, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  22. Ratcliffe JH (2010) The spatial dependency of crime increase dispersion. Secur J 23(1):18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods, vol 1. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Reuter P (2009) Systemic violence in drug markets. Crime Law Soc Change 52(3):275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodriguez-Oreggia, Flores M (2014) Structural factors of homicides under army interventions in local mexico. Working paper, Escuela de Gobierno y Transfromacion PublicaGoogle Scholar
  26. Seelke CR (2010) Gangs in Central America. DIANE Publishing, CollingdaleGoogle Scholar
  27. Snyder R, Duran-Martinez A (2009) Does illegality breed violence? Drug trafficking and state-sponsored protection rackets. Crime Law Soc Change 52(3):253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 64(4):583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zimring FE, Hawkins G (1997) Crime is not the problem: lethal violence in America. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Personal Financial PlanningTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.School of Government and Public TransformationITESMSan Pedro Garza GarciaMexico

Personalised recommendations