The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 927–944 | Cite as

The determinants of exit in a developing country: core and peripheral regions

  • Carla Daniela Calá
  • Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod
  • Miguel Manjón-Antolín
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper analyses the regional determinants of exit in developing countries, using Argentina as an illustrative case. We find evidence of a dynamic revolving door by which past entrants increase current exits, particularly in the peripheral regions. In the central regions, current and past incumbents cause an analogous displacement effect. Also, exit shows a U-shaped relationship with respect to the informal economy, although the positive effect is weaker in the central regions. These findings point to the existence of a core–periphery structure in the spatial distribution of exits.

JEL Classification

R12 R30 C33 

Supplementary material

168_2015_695_MOESM1_ESM.docx (36 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (docx 35 KB)
168_2015_695_MOESM2_ESM.xls (66 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (xls 66 KB)

References

  1. Agarwal R, Gort M (1996) The evolution of markets and entry, exit and survival of firm. Rev Econ Stat 78:489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion P, Howitt P (1998) Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison PD, Waterman RP (2002) Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociol Methodol 3:247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Álvarez R, Görg H (2009) Multinationals and plant exit: evidence from Chile. Int Rev Econ Finance 18(1):45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Álvarez R, Vergara S (2010) Exit in developing countries: economic reforms and plant heterogeneity. Econ Dev Cult Change 58(3):537–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Álvarez R, Vergara S (2013) Trade exposure, survival and growth of small and medium-size firms. Int Rev Econ Finance 25:185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arauzo-Carod JM, Manjón-Antolín M, Martín M, Segarra A (2007) Regional and sector-specific determinants of industry dynamics and the displacement-replacement effects. Empirica 34(2):89–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch DB (1995) Innovation and industry evolution. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch DB, Mahmood T (1995) New firms survival: new results using a hazard function. Rev Econ Stat 77(1):97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Audretsch DB, Keilbach MC, Lehmann EE (2006) Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baldwin JRB, Dupuy L, Richard Gellatly G (2000) Failure rates for new Canadian firms: new perspectives on entry and exit. Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartelsman E, Haltiwanger J, Scarpetta S (2004) Microeconomic evidence of creative destruction in industrial and developing countries. Institute for the Study of Labor, IZA, Discussion Paper no 3464Google Scholar
  13. Bennet J (2010) Informal firms in developing countries: Entrepreneurial stepping stone or consolation prize? Small Bus Econ 34:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bértola L, Ocampo JA (2012) The economic development of latin America since independence. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boeri T, Bellman L (1995) Post-entry behaviour and the cycle: evidence from Germany. Int J Ind Organ 13(4):483–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Box M (2008) The death of firms: exploring the effects of environment and birth cohort on firm survival in Sweden. Small Bus Econ 31:379–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bresnahan TF, Reiss PC (1991) Entry and competition in concentrated markets. J Polit Econ 99(5):977–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brixy U, Grotz R (2007) Regional patterns and determinants of birth and survival of new firms in Western Germany. Entrep Reg Dev 19(4):293–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buss TF, Lin X (1990) Business survival in rural America: a three-state study. Growth Change 21:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buzzelli M (2005) What explains firm transience in house-building? A regional analysis of Ontario, Canada, 1991 and 1996. Reg Stud 39(6):699–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Calá CD, Rotondo JS (2012) Dinámica empresarial en la industria argentina. Un análisis provincial para el período 2003–2008. Revista Realidad Económica 267:138–170Google Scholar
  22. Calá CD, Manjón-Antolín M, Arauzo-Carod JM (2014) Regional determinants of firm entry in a developing country. Pap Reg Sci. doi:10.1111/pirs.12128
  23. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2009) Microeconometrics using stata. Stata PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Carree M, Thurik R (1996) Entry and exit in retailing: incentives, barriers, displacement and replacement. Rev Ind Organ 11(2):155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Carree M, Santarelli S, Verheul I (2008) Firm entry and exit in Italian provinces and the relationship with unemployment. Int Entrep Manag J 4:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Carreira C, Teixeira P (2011) The shadow of death: analysing the pre-exit productivity of Portuguese manufacturing firms. Small Bus Econ 36:337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cassiolato JE, Pagola CB, Lastres HM (2009) Technical change and structural inequalities: converging approaches to problems of underdevelopment. In: Drechsler WJ, Kattel R, Reinert ES (eds) Techno-economic paradigms: essays in honour of Carlota Perez. Anthem PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Caves R, Porter M (1976) Barriers to exit. In: Masson R, Qualls D (eds) Essays on industrial organization in honour of Joe Bain. Ballinger, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Das S, Das S (1996) Dynamics of entry and exit of firms in the presence of entry adjustment costs. Int J Ind Organ 15:217–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) (2002) The integration of Latin America and the Caribbean in global trade and production circuits. In: Globalization and development, Ch. 6, ECLACGoogle Scholar
  32. Eslava M, Haltiwanger JC, Kugler AD, Kugler M (2006) Plant turnover and structural reforms in Colombia. IMF Staff Pap 53:58–75Google Scholar
  33. Esteve S, Sanchís A, Sanchís J (2004) The determinants of survival of Spanish manufacturing firms. Rev Ind Organ 25:251–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fertala N (2008) The shadow of death: Do regional differences matter for firm survival across native and immigrant entrepreneurs? Empirica 35:59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Forsyth GD (2005) A note on small business survival in rural areas: the case of Washington state. Growth Change 36:428–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fotopoulos G, Spence N (1998) Accounting for net entry into Greek manufacturing by establishments of varying size. Small Bus Econ 11:125–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Frank M (1988) An intertemporal model of industrial exit. Q J Econ 103(2):333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frazer G (2005) Which firms die? A look at manufacturing firm exit in Ghana. Econ Dev Cult Change 53(3):585–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fritsch M, Brixy U, Falck O (2006) The effect of industry, region, and time on new business survival. Rev Ind Organ 28:285–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gerritse M, Moreno-Monroy AI (2012) Informal sector and manufacturing location: in search of the missing links. Spat Econ Anal 7(2):179–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ghani E, Kerr WR, O’Connell S (2011) Promoting entrepreneurship, growth, and job creation. In: Ghani E (ed) Ch., vol 7, pp 166–199Google Scholar
  42. Ghemawat P, Nalebuff B (1985) Exit. RAND J Econ 16:184–194Google Scholar
  43. Gries T, Naudé W (2010) Entrepreneurship and structural economic transformation. Small Bus Econ 34(1):13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Günalp B, Cilasun SM (2006) Determinants of entry in Turkish manufacturing industries. Small Bus Econ 27:275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hausman J, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R & D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hausmann R, Rodrik D (2003) Economic development as self-discovery. J Dev Econ 72(2):603–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Huiban JP (2011) The spatial demography of new plants: urban creation and rural survival. Small Bus Econ 37(1):73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Huisman C, van Wissen L (2004) Localization effects of firm startups and closures in the Netherlands. Ann Reg Sci 38:291–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ilmakunnas P, Topi J (1999) Microeconomic and macroeconomic influences on entry and exit of firms. Rev Ind Organ 15:283–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. INDEC (2005) Anuario Estadístico de la República Argentina. INDEC, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  51. Jovanovic B (1982) Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica 50(3):649–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Katz J, Bernat G (2011) Exit-entry, productivity growth and structural change in response to changes in macroeconomic policy: evidence from Argentina. Innov Dev 1(2):227–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Keeble D, Walker S (1994) New firms, small firms and dead firms: spatial patterns and determinants in the United Kingdom. Reg Stud 28(4):411–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kendall J, Mylenko N, Ponce A (2010) Measuring financial access around the world. Policy Research Working Paper 5253, The World BankGoogle Scholar
  55. Klepper S (1996) Entry, exit, growth and innovation over the product cycle. Am Econ Rev 86(3):562–583Google Scholar
  56. Kosacoff B, Ramos A (1999) El debate sobre política industrial. Revista de la CEPAL 68:35–60Google Scholar
  57. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lay TJ (2003) The determinants of and interaction between entry and exit in Taiwan’s manufacturing. Small Bus Econ 20:319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lin Z, Picot G, Compton J (2001) The entry and exit dynamics of self-employment in Canada. Small Bus Econ 15:105–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Littunen H, Storhammar E, Nenonen T (1998) The survival of firms over the critical first 3 years and the local environment. Entrep Reg Dev 10(3):189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. López RA (2006) Imports of intermediate inputs and plant survival. Econ Lett 92(1):58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Love JH (1996) Entry and exit: a county-level analysis. Appl Econ 28:441–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. MacDonald JM (1986) Entry and exit on the competitive fringe. South Econ J 52:640–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Manjón-Antolín MC (2010) Firm size and short-term dynamics in aggregate entry and exit. Int J Ind Organ 28(5):464–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. MTEySS (2007) La creación de empresas durante la etapa post convertibilidad (2003–2005): Impacto sobre el empleo asalariado registrado. In: Salarios, empresas y empleo 2003–2006, Series Trabajo, ocupación y empleo, no 5. National Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social SecurityGoogle Scholar
  66. Naudé W, Gries T, Wood E, Meintjies A (2008) Regional determinants of entrepreneurial start-ups in a developing country. Entrep Reg Dev Int J 20(2):111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nyström K (2007a) An industry disaggregated analysis of the determinants of regional entry and exit. Ann Reg Sci 41:877–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nyström K (2007b) Patterns and determinants of entry and exit in industrial sectors in Sweden. J Int Entrep 5:85–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ocampo JA, Rada C, Taylor L (2009) Growth and policy in developing countries: a structuralist approach. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Ozturk S, Kilic C (2012) Patterns and determinants of entry and exit in Turkish manufacturing industries. Int J Arts Commer 1(5):107–118Google Scholar
  71. Santarelli E, Tran HT (2012) Growth of incumbent firms and entrepreneurship in Vietnam. Growth Change 43(4):638–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Santarelli E, Carree M, Verheul I (2009) Unemployment and firm entry and exit: an update on a controversial relationship. Reg Stud 43(8):1061–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schneider F (2005) Shadow economies around the world: what do we really know? Eur J Polit Econ 21:598–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stiglitz J (1998) Towards a new paradigm for development: strategies, policies, and processes. Given as the 1998 Prebisch Lecture at UNCTAD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  75. Sunkel O (1978) La dependencia y la heterogeneidad estructural. Trimest Econ 45(1):3–20 México, DFGoogle Scholar
  76. Venables AJ (2005) Spatial disparities in developing countries: cities, regions, and international trade. J Econ Geogr 5(1):3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang S (2006) Determinants of new firm formation in Taiwan. Small Bus Econ 27:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carla Daniela Calá
    • 1
  • Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod
    • 2
    • 3
  • Miguel Manjón-Antolín
    • 2
  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y SocialesUniversidad Nacional de Mar del PlataMar del PlataArgentina
  2. 2.Department of Economics, CREIP and Quantitative Urban and Regional Economics (QURE)Universitat Rovira i VirgiliReusSpain
  3. 3.Institut d’Economia de Barcelona (IEB)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations