The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 577–590 | Cite as

Barriers to cross-region research and development collaborations in Europe: evidence from the fifth European Framework Programme

  • Aurélien Fichet de Clairfontaine
  • Manfred M. Fischer
  • Rafael Lata
  • Manfred Paier
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on cross-region R&D collaboration funded by the fifth EU Framework Programme (FP5). The objective is to measure distance, institutional, language and technological barrier effects that may hamper collaborative activities between European regions. Particular emphasis is laid on measuring discrepancies between two types of collaborative R&D activities, those generating output in terms of scientific publications and those that do not. The study area is composed of 255 NUTS-2 regions that cover the pre-2007 member states of the European Union (excluding Malta and Cyprus) as well as Norway and Switzerland. We employ a negative binomial spatial interaction model specification to address the research question, along with an eigenvector spatial filtering technique suggested by Fischer and Griffith (2008) to account for the presence of network autocorrelation in the origin–destination cooperation data. The study provides evidence that the role of geographical distance as collaborative deterrent is significantly lower if collaborations generate scientific output. Institutional barriers do not play a significant role for collaborations with scientific output. Language and technological barriers are smaller but the estimates indicate no significant discrepancies between the two types of collaborative R&D activities that are in focus of this study.

JEL Classification

C31 O39 R15 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Almendral JA, Oliveira J, López L, Sanjuán MA, Mendes J (2007) The interplay of universities and industry through the FP5 network. New J Phys 9(6):183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber MJ, Fischer MM, Scherngell T (2011) The community structure of research and development cooperation in Europe. Evidence from a social network perspective. Geogr Anal 43(4):415–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolduc D, Laferrière R, Santarossa G (1995) Spatial autoregressive error components in travel flow models: an application to aggregate mode choice. In: Anselin L, Florax R (eds) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Berlin, pp 96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regres anal count data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chun Y (2008) Modeling network autocorrelation within migration flows by eigenvector spatial filtering. J Geogr Syst 10(4):317–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chun Y, Griffith DA (2011) Modeling network autocorrelation in space-time migration flow data: an eigenvector spatial filtering approach. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101(3):523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CORDIS (2008) FP5 - EC Programme: Maximum amounts and breakdown (1998–2002). URL: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp5/about.htm
  8. European Council (1998) Council decision of 22 December 1998 concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the dissemination of research results for the implementation of the fifth Framework Programme of the European Community (1998–2002). http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp5.html
  9. Fischer MM, Griffith DA (2008) Modeling spatial autocorrelation in spatial interaction data: an application to patent citation data in the European Union. J Reg Sci 48(5):969–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer MM, Scherngell T, Jansenberger E (2006) The geography of knowledge spillovers between high-technology firms in Europe: evidence from a spatial interaction modeling perspective. Geogr Anal 38(3):288–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gourieroux C, Monfort A, Trognon A (1984) Pseudo-maximum likelihood methods: applications to Poisson models. Econometrica 52(3):701–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greene WH (1997) Econom anal, 7th edn. Pearson Education, EssexGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffith DA, Fischer MM (2013) Constrained variants of the gravity model and spatial dependence: model specification and estimation issues. J Geogr Syst 15(3):291–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoekman J, Frenken K, van Oort F (2009) The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. Ann Reg Sci 43(3):721–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoekman J, Scherngell T, Frenken K, Tijssen R (2013) Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration. J Econ Geogr 13(1):23–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kristzin T, Fischer MM (2014) The gravity model for international trade: specification and estimation issues. Paper presented at the 54th European Congress of the Regional Science Association, St. Petersburg, 26–29 August 2014Google Scholar
  17. LeSage JP, Fischer MM, Scherngell T (2007) Knowledge spillovers across Europe: evidence from a Poisson spatial interaction modelling perspective. Geogr Anal 38(3):288–309Google Scholar
  18. LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) Introd spat econom. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  19. Long JS (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage, Thousand Oaks, London and New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  20. Maggioni MA, Uberti TE (2009) Knowledge networks across Europe: Which distance matters? Ann Reg Sci 43(3):691–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maggioni MA, Nosvelli M, Uberti TE (2007) Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: a European analysis. Pap Reg Sci 86(3):471–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maurseth PB, Verspagen B (2002) Knowledge spillovers in Europe: a patent citations analysis. Scand J Econ 104(4):531–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pace RK, LeSage JP, Zhu S (2013) Interpretation and computation of estimates from regression models using spatial filtering. Spat Econ Anal 8(3):352–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paier M, Scherngell T (2011) Determinants of collaboration in European R&D networks: empirical evidence from a discrete choice model. Ind Innov 18(1):89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ponds R, van Oort F, Frenken K (2007) The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Pap Reg Sci 86(3):423–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reinold F, Paier M, Fischer MM (2014) Joint knowledge production in European R&D networks: results from a discrete choice modeling perspective. In: Scherngell T (ed) The geography of networks and R&D collaborations. Springer, Berlin, pp 201–220Google Scholar
  27. Scherngell T, Barber MJ (2009) Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations: empirical evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme. Pap Reg Sci 88(3):531–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scherngell T, Barber MJ (2011) Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: evidence from the fifth EU Framework Programme. Ann Reg Sci 46(2):247–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scherngell T, Lata R (2013) Towards an integrated European research area? Findings from eigenvector spatially filtered spatial interaction models using European Framework Programme data. Pap Reg Sci 92(3):555–577Google Scholar
  30. Santos Silva JMC, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev Econ Stat 88(4):641–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tiefelsdorf M (2003) Misspecification in interaction model distance decay relations: a spatial structure effect. J Geogr Syst 5(1):25–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tiefelsdorf M, Griffith DA (2007) Semiparametric filtering of spatial autocorrelation: the eigenvector approach. Environ Plan A 39(1):1193–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wasserman S, Faust K (1997) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aurélien Fichet de Clairfontaine
    • 1
  • Manfred M. Fischer
    • 1
  • Rafael Lata
    • 2
  • Manfred Paier
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Economic Geography and GIScienceVienna University of Economics and Business (WU)ViennaAustria
  2. 2.The Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG)ViennaAustria
  3. 3.Austrian Institute of Technology (AIT)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations