The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 401–416

Agglomeration economies in Japanese industries: the Solow residual approach

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper proposes a new approach to measuring agglomeration economies in Japan. Under the proposed approach, we used the Solow residual to measure agglomeration economies and confirmed that agglomeration economies exist in both manufacturing and non-manufacturing industries. Furthermore, this paper shows that social overhead capital has a positive effect on agglomeration economies. Currently, agglomeration economies are robust only in metropolitan areas; however, they are present throughout Japan because of the disproportionate allocation of social overhead capital within the nation.

JEL Classification

D24 R11 R12 

References

  1. Beeson PE, Husted S (1989) Patterns and determinants of productive efficiency in state manufacturing. J Reg Sci 29(1):15–28Google Scholar
  2. Ciccone A (2002) Agglomeration effects in Europe. Eur Econ Rev 46(2):213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ciccone A, Hall R (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 86(1):54–70Google Scholar
  4. Driffield N, Munday M (2001) Foreign manufacturing, regional agglomeration and technical efficiency in UK industries: a stochastic production frontier approach. Reg Stud 35(5):391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujita M, Thisse J (2002) Economics of agglomeration. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glaeser EL, Kolko J, Saiz A (2001) Consumer city. J Econ Geogr 1(1):27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Graham DJ (2009) Identifying urbanization and localization externalities in manufacturing and service industries. Pap Reg Sci 88(1):63–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graham DJ, Kim HY (2008) An empirical analytical framework for agglomeration economies. Ann Reg Sci 42(2):267–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henderson JV (1986) Efficiency of resource usage and city size. J Urban Econ 19(1):47–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henderson JV (2003) Marshall’s scale economies. J Urban Econ 53(1):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kanemoto Y, Ohkawara T, Suzuki T (1996) Agglomeration economies and a test for optimal city sizes in Japan. J Jpn Int Econ 10(4):379–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCann P (2001) Urban Reg Econ. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Mitra A (1999) Agglomeration economies as manifested in technical efficiency at the firm level. J Urban Econ 45(3):490–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitra A (2000) Total factor productivity growth and urbanization economies: a case of Indian industries. Rev Urban Reg Dev Stud 12(2):97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moomaw RL (1981) Productivity and city size: a review of the evidence. Q J Econ 96(4):675–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moomaw RL (1983) Is population scale a worthless surrogate for business agglomeration economies? Reg Sci Urban Econ 13(4):525–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakamura R (1985) Agglomeration economies in urban manufacturing industries: a case of Japanese cities. J Urban Econ 17(1):108–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Otsuka A, Goto M, Sueyoshi T (2010) Industrial agglomeration effects in Japan: productive efficiency, market access, and public fiscal transfer. Pap Reg Sci 89(4):819–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Otsuka A, Goto M, Sueyoshi T (2014) Cost-efficiency of Japanese local governments: effects of decentralization and regional integration. Reg Stud Reg Sci 1(1):207–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Otsuka A, Goto M (2013) Regional policy and the productive efficiency of Japanese industries. Reg Stud. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.795285
  21. Rosenthal S, Strange W (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosenthal S, Strange W (2005) The attenuation of human capital spillovers: a Manhattan skyline approach. Working paper, Syracuse UniversityGoogle Scholar
  23. Tveteras R, Battese GE (2006) Agglomeration externalities, productivity, and technical inefficiency. J Reg Sci 46(4):605–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Socio-Economic Research CenterCentral Research Institute of Electric Power IndustryTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Decision Science and TechnologyTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations