Advertisement

The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 55–92 | Cite as

What determines entry? Evidence from Sweden

  • Niklas ElertEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, I examined what conditions affected the entry of Swedish limited liability firms 2000–2008, while making a distinction between regular entrants and those that survive for at least 2 years. I used a dataset that makes it possible to trace entry geographically as well as in what industry it occurs down to the 5-digit NACE level. Results suggest that the conditions influencing regular entry were similar to those influencing surviving entry. Political variables, e.g., municipal tax rate and the ideology of local rule, were of limited importance. Meanwhile, municipalities with industries with high minimum efficient scale of production or high market concentration rates were considerably less likely to see new firm formation. Substantially, more entry occurred in municipalities with high-income and a well-educated population. The importance of the level of education appears stronger for surviving entrants than for regular entrants, pointing to the importance of human capital.

JEL Classification

D22 L25 L26 

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Zillibotti F (2006) Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. J Eur Econ Assoc 4(1):37–74Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Lelarge C, van Reenen J, Zillibotti F (2007) Technology, information, and the decentralization of the firm. Q J Econ 122(4):1759–1799Google Scholar
  3. Acs ZJ (2006) How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth? Innov Technol Govern Glob 1(1):97–107Google Scholar
  4. Acs ZJ (2010) High-impact entrepreneurship. In: Handbook of entrepreneurship research, pp 165–182Google Scholar
  5. Acs ZJ, Mueller P (2008) Employment effects of business dynamics: mize, gazelles and elephants. Small Bus Econ 30:85–100Google Scholar
  6. Acs ZJ, Storey DJ (2004) Introduction: entrepreneurship and economic development. Reg Stud 38(8):871–877Google Scholar
  7. Acs ZJ, Armington C, Zhang T (2007) The determinants of new-firm survival across regional economies: the role of human capital stock and knowledge spillover. Pap Reg Sci 86(3):367–391Google Scholar
  8. Acs ZJ, Braunerhjelm P, Audretsch DB, Carlsson B (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 32(1):15–30Google Scholar
  9. Agarval R, Audretsch DB (2001) Does entry size matter? The impact of the life cycle and technology on firm survival. J Ind Econ 49(1):21–43Google Scholar
  10. Aghion P, Griffith R (2008) Competition and growth: reconciling theory and evidence. University College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):323–351Google Scholar
  12. Aghion P, Burgess R, Redding S, Zilibotti F (2004) Entry and productivity growth: evidence from microlevel panel data. J Eur Econ Assoc 2(2–3):265–276Google Scholar
  13. Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. Q J Econ 120(2):701–728Google Scholar
  14. Aidis R, Estrin S, Mickiwics T (2009) Entrepreneurial entry: Which institutions matter? IZA discussion papers 4123, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)Google Scholar
  15. Alañón-Pardo Á, Arauzo-Carod JM (2013) Agglomeration, accessibility and industrial location: evidence from Spain. Entrep Reg Dev 25(3–4):135–173Google Scholar
  16. Amoros JE, Bosma N (2013) Global entrepreneurship monitor 2013 global report. Fifteen years of assessing entrepreneurship across the globe. Global Entrepreneurship Research AssociationGoogle Scholar
  17. Anand J, Kogut B (1997) Technological capabilities of countries, firm rivalry and foreign direct investment. J Int Bus Stud 28(3):445–465Google Scholar
  18. Andersson M, Klepper S (2013) Characteristics and performance of new firms and spinoffs in Sweden. Ind Corp Change 22(1):245–280Google Scholar
  19. Andersson M, Koster S (2011) Sources of persistence in regional start-up rates: evidence from Sweden. J Econ Geogr 11(1):179–201Google Scholar
  20. Andersson M, Noseleit F (2011) Start-ups and employment dynamics within and across sectors. Small Bus Econ 36(4):461–483Google Scholar
  21. Andersson P, Braunerhjelm M, Thulin P (2012) Creative destruction and productivity: entrepreneurship by type, sector and sequence. J Entrep Pub Policy 1(2):125–146Google Scholar
  22. Anselin L, Rey S (1992) Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geogr Anal 23:112–130Google Scholar
  23. Appelbaum E, Katz E (1986) Rent seeking and entry. Econ Lett 20(3):207–212Google Scholar
  24. Arauzo-Carod JM (2005) Determinants of industrial location: an application for catalan municipalities. Pap Reg Sci 84(1):105–120Google Scholar
  25. Arauzo-Carod JM (2008) Industrial location at a local level: comments on the territorial level of the analysis. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 99(2):193–208Google Scholar
  26. Arauzo-Carod JM, Manjón-Antolín MC (2004) Firm size and geographical aggregation: an empirical appraisal in industrial location. Small Bus Econ 22(3–4):299–312Google Scholar
  27. Arauzo-Carod JM, Viladecans-Marsal E (2009) Industrial location at the intra-metropolitan level: the role of agglomeration economies. Reg Stud 43(4):545–558Google Scholar
  28. Arauzo-Carod JM, Liviano-Solis D, Manjón-Antolín M (2010) Empirical studies in industrial location: an assessment of their methods and results. J Reg Sci 50(3):685–711Google Scholar
  29. Ardagna S, Lusardi AM (2010a) Explaining international differences in entrepreneurship: the role of individual characteristics and regulatory constraints. In: Lerner J, Schoar A (eds) International differences in entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 17–62Google Scholar
  30. Ardagna S, Lusardi AM (2010b) Heterogeneity in the effect of regulation on entrepreneurship and entry size. J Eur Econ Assoc 8(2–3):594–605Google Scholar
  31. Armington C, Acs ZJ (2002) The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Reg Stud 36(1):33–45Google Scholar
  32. Ashcroft B, Love JH, Malloy E (1991) New firm formation in the British counties with special reference to Scotland. Reg Stud 25(5):395–409Google Scholar
  33. Atkins DC, Gallop RJ (2007) Rethinking how family researchers model infrequent outcomes: a tutorial on count regression and zero-inflated models. J Fam Psychol 21(4):726–735Google Scholar
  34. Audretsch D, Mahmood T (1995) New firm survival: new results using a hazard function. Rev Econ Stat 77(1):97–103Google Scholar
  35. Audretsch D, Fritsch M (1994a) On the measurement of entry rates. Empirica 21:105–113Google Scholar
  36. Audretsch DB, Fritsch M (1994b) The geography of firm births in Germany. Reg Stud 28(4):359–365Google Scholar
  37. Audretsch DB, Fritsch M (1999) The industry component of regional new firm formation processes. Rev Ind Organ 15(3):239–252Google Scholar
  38. Audretsch DB, Vivarelli M (1996) Determinants of new-firm startups in Italy. Empirica 23(1):91–105Google Scholar
  39. Audretsch DB, Vivarelli M (1995) New-firm formation in Italy: a first report. Econ Lett 48(1):77–81Google Scholar
  40. Audretsch DB, Lehmann E, Warning S (2005) University spillovers and new firm location. Res Policy 34(7):1113–1122Google Scholar
  41. Autant-Bernard C, Mangematin V, Massard N (2006) Creation of biotech SMEs in France. Small Bus Econ 26(2):173–187Google Scholar
  42. Ayyagari M, Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A (2007) Small and medium enterprises across the globe. Small Bus Econ 29(4):415–434Google Scholar
  43. Bain JS (1956) Barriers to new competition. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Baptista R, Mendonça J (2010) Proximity to knowledge sources and the location of knowledge-based start-ups. Ann Reg Sci 45(1):5–29Google Scholar
  45. Baptista R, Preto MT (2011) New firm formation and employment growth: regional and business dynamics. Small Bus Econ 36(4):419–442Google Scholar
  46. Baptista R, Lima F, Mendonça J (2011) Establishment of higher education institutions and new firm entry. Res Policy 40(5):751–760Google Scholar
  47. Barbosa N, Guimarães P, Woodward D (2004) Foreign firm entry in an open economy: the case of Portugal. Appl Econ 36(5):465–472Google Scholar
  48. Bartelsman E, Scarpetta S, Schivardi F (2005) Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: evidence from micro-level sources in OECD countries. Ind Corp Change 14(3):365–391Google Scholar
  49. Basile R (2004) Acquisition versus greenfield investment: the location of foreign manufacturers in Italy. Reg Sci Urban Econ 34(1):3–25Google Scholar
  50. Bates T (1990) Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. Rev Econ Stat 72(4):551–559Google Scholar
  51. Baumol W (1990) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. J Polit Econ 98(5):893–921Google Scholar
  52. Baumol W (1993) Entrepreneurship, management, and the structure of payoffs. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Baumol W (2002) The free-market innovation machine: analyzing the growth miracle of capitalism. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  54. Baumol W, Strom R (2007) Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Strateg Entrep J 1(3–4):233–237Google Scholar
  55. Bartik T (1985) Business location decisions in the United States: estimates of the effects of unionization, taxes, and other characteristics of states. J Bus Econ Stat 3(1):14–22Google Scholar
  56. Becker R, Henderson V (2000) Effects of air quality regulations on polluting industries. J Polit Econ 108(2):379–421Google Scholar
  57. Beesley ME, Hamilton RT (1984) Small firms’ seedbed role and the concept of turbulence. J Ind Econ 33(2):217–231Google Scholar
  58. Bergh A (2009) Den kapitalistiska välfärdsstaten: om den svenska modellens historia och framtid. Norstedts FörlagGoogle Scholar
  59. Berglund E, Brännäs K (2001) Plants’ entry and exit in Swedish municipalities. Ann Reg Sci 35(3):431–448Google Scholar
  60. Blanchflower D, Oswald AJ (1998) What makes an entrepreneur? J Labor Econ 16:26–60Google Scholar
  61. Blau DM (1987) A time-series analysis of self-employment in the United States. J Polit Econ 95(3):445–467Google Scholar
  62. Boettke P (2001) Calculation and coordination: essays on socialism and transitional political economy. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Boettke PJ, Coyne CJ (2003) Entrepreneurship and development: Cause or consequence? Adv Austrian Econ 6:67–87Google Scholar
  64. Bos J, Stam E (2014) Gazelles and industry growth: a study of young high-growth firms in The Netherlands. Ind Corp Change 23(1):145–169Google Scholar
  65. Boschma RA, Lambooy JG (1999) Evolutionary economics and economic geography. J Evolut Econ 9(4):411–429Google Scholar
  66. Bosma N, Acs ZJ, Autio E, Coduras A, Levie J (2010) Global entrepreneurship monitor 2008 executive report. Global Entrepreneurship Research AssociationGoogle Scholar
  67. Bowen HP, De Clercq D (2007) Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. J Int Bus Stud 39(4):747–767Google Scholar
  68. Braunerhjelm P (2011) Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: interdependencies, irregularities and regularities. In: Audretsch DB, Falck O, Heblich S (eds) Handbook of research on innovation and entrepreneurshipGoogle Scholar
  69. Braunerhjelm P, Holmquist C, Adenfeldt M, Thulin P (2013) Entreprenorskap i sverige: Nationell rapport 2013. EntreprenörskapsforumGoogle Scholar
  70. Brixy U, Grotz R (2006) Regional patterns and determinants of new firm formation and survival in western Germany. Technical report, IAB discussion paperGoogle Scholar
  71. Brown C, Haltiwanger J, Lane J (2006) Economic turbulence: Is a volatile economy good for America?. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  72. Bruno A, Tyebjee T (1982) The environment for entrepreneurship. In: Kent CA, Sexton DL, Vesper KH (eds) Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 288–307Google Scholar
  73. Busenitz L, Gomez C, Spencer J (2000) Country institutional profiles: unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Acad Manag J 43(5):994–1003Google Scholar
  74. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1986) Econometric models based on count data: comparisons of some estimators and tests. J Appl Econ 1:29–54Google Scholar
  75. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  76. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2001) Essentials of count data regression. In: A companion to theoretical econometrics, p 331Google Scholar
  77. Carlton D (1983) The location and employment choices of new firms: An econometric model with discrete and continuous endogenous variables. Rev Econ Stat 65:440–449Google Scholar
  78. Carree M, Thurik R (2008) The lag structure of the impact of business ownership on economic performance in OECD countries. Small Bus Econ 30(1):101–110Google Scholar
  79. Carree MA (2002) Does unemployment affect the number of establishments? A regional analysis for US states. Reg Stud 36(4):389–398Google Scholar
  80. Carreira C, Teixeira P (2010) Does schumpeterian creative destruction lead to higher productivity? The effects of firms’ entry. In: Contribution to the international schumpeter society conference 2010, Aalborg, June 21–24Google Scholar
  81. Cassar G (2006) Entrepreneur opportunity costs and intended venture growth. J Bus Ventur 21(5):610–632Google Scholar
  82. Cassar G (2007) Money, money, money? A longitudinal investigation of entrepreneur career reasons, growth preferences and achieved growth. Entrep Reg Dev 19(1):89–107Google Scholar
  83. Chappell WF, Kimenyi MS, Mayer WJ (1990) A poisson probability model of entry and market structure with an application to US industries during 1972–1977. South Econ J 56(4):918–927Google Scholar
  84. Christensen C (2013) The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review, BostonGoogle Scholar
  85. Ciccone A, Papaioannou E (2007) Red tape and delayed entry. J Eur Econ Assoc 5(2–3):444–458Google Scholar
  86. Cieślik A (2005) Location of foreign firms and national border effects: the case of Poland. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96(3):287–297Google Scholar
  87. Cockburn IM, MacGarvie MJ (2011) Entry and patenting in the software industry. Manag Sci 57(5):915–933Google Scholar
  88. Coughlin CC, Terza JV, Arromdee V (1991) State characteristics and the location of foreign direct investment within the United States. Rev Econ Stat 73:675–683Google Scholar
  89. Cowling M, Mitchell P (2002) The evolution of UK self-employment: a study of government policy and the role of the macroeconomy. Manch Sch 65(4):427–442Google Scholar
  90. Cressy R (2006) Why do most firms die young? Small Bus Econ 26(2):103–116Google Scholar
  91. Daunfeldt S (2002) Etablerandet av nya företag inom detaljhandeln—en beskrivning av ett forskningsprojekt, handelns Utredningsinstitut HUI Forskningsrapport S68Google Scholar
  92. Daunfeldt S, Rudholm N, Bergström F (2006) Entry into Swedish retail and wholesale trade markets. Rev Ind Organ 29(3):213–225Google Scholar
  93. Daunfeldt S, Orth M, Rudholm N (2010) Opening local retail food stores: a real-options approach. J Ind Compet Trade 10(3):373–387Google Scholar
  94. Daunfeldt S, Elert N, Rudholm N (2013) Start-ups and firm in-migration: evidence from the Swedish wholesale industry. Ann Reg Sci 51(2):479–494Google Scholar
  95. Davidson R, MacKinnon JG (1993) Estimation and inference in econometrics. OUP CatalogueGoogle Scholar
  96. Davidsson P (1991) Continued entrepreneurship: ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth. J Bus Ventur 6(6):405–429Google Scholar
  97. Davidsson P, Wiklund J (1997) Values, beliefs and regional variations in new firm formation rates. J Econ Psychol 18(2):179–199Google Scholar
  98. Davidsson P, Lindmark L, Olofsson C (1994) New firm formation and regional development in Sweden. Reg Stud 28(4):395–410Google Scholar
  99. Davidsson P, Lindmark L, Olofsson C (1996) Näringslivsdynamik under 90-talet. NutekGoogle Scholar
  100. Davis S, Henrekson M (1999) Explaining national differences in the size and industry distribution employment. Small Bus Econ 12(1):59–83Google Scholar
  101. De Meza D (2002) Overlending? Econ J 112(477):F17–F31Google Scholar
  102. Dejardin M (2011) Linking net entry to regional economic growth. Small Bus Econ 36(4):443–460Google Scholar
  103. Delmar F, Davidsson P (2000) Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrep Reg Dev 12(1):1–23Google Scholar
  104. Delmar F, Wennberg K (2010) Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship: the birth, growth and demise of entrepreneurial firms. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  105. Delmar F, Wiklund J, Sjöberg K (2003) The involvement in self-employment among the Swedish science and technology labor force between 1990 and 2000. Institutet för tillväxtpolitiska studier (ITPS)Google Scholar
  106. Djankov S, Glanser T, McLiesh C, Ramalho R, Schleifer A (2010) The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. Am Econ J Macroecon 2(3):31–64Google Scholar
  107. Dohse D, Schertler A (2003) Explaining the regional distribution of new economy firms: a count data analysis. Technical report, Kieler ArbeitspapiereGoogle Scholar
  108. Doms M, Lewis E, Robb A (2010) Local labor force education, new business characteristics, and firm performance. J Urban Econ 67(1):61–77Google Scholar
  109. Du Rietz G, Johansson D, Stenkula M (2013) The evolution of Swedish labor income taxation in a 150-year perspective: an in-depth characterization. Technical report, IFN working paper no. 977Google Scholar
  110. Du Rietz G, Johansson D, Stenkula M (2014) A 150-year perspective on Swedish capital income taxation. Technical report, IFN working paper no. 1004Google Scholar
  111. Dunne T, Roberts MJ, Samuelson L (1988) Patterns of firm entry and exit in US manufacturing industries. RAND J Econ 19:495–515Google Scholar
  112. Earle JS, Sakova Z (2000) Business start-ups or disguised unemployment? Evidence on the character of self-employment from transition economies. Labour Econ 7(5):575–601Google Scholar
  113. Eliasson K, Westlund H (2013) Attributes influencing self-employment propensity in urban and rural Sweden. Ann Reg Sci 50(2):479–514Google Scholar
  114. Engström P, Holmlund B (2009) Tax evasion and self-employment in a high-tax country: evidence from Sweden. Appl Econ 41(19):2419–2430Google Scholar
  115. Etzioni A (1987) Entrepreneurship, adaptation and legitimation: a macro-behavioral perspective. J Econ Behav Organ 8(2):175–189Google Scholar
  116. Evans DS, Jovanovic B (1989) An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. J Polit Econ 97(4):808–827Google Scholar
  117. Evans DS, Leighton LS (1989) The determinants of changes in US self-employment, 1968–1987. Small Bus Econ 1(2):111–119Google Scholar
  118. Evans DS, Leighton LS (1990) Small business formation by unemployed and employed workers. Small Bus Econ 2(4):319–330Google Scholar
  119. Fazzari S, Hubbard G, Petersen B (1988) Financing constraints and corporate investment. BPEA 19:141–195Google Scholar
  120. Feldman MP (2001) The entrepreneurial event revisited: firm formation in a regional context. Ind Corp Change 10(4):861–891Google Scholar
  121. Figueiredo O, Guimaraes P, Woodward D (2002) Home-field advantage: location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs. J Urban Econ 52(2):341–361Google Scholar
  122. Fölster S (2002) Do lower taxes stimulate self-employment? Small Bus Econ 19(2):135–145Google Scholar
  123. Fritsch M (1997) New firms and regional employment change. Small Bus Econ 9(5):437–448Google Scholar
  124. Fritsch M (2011) The effect of new business formation on regional development: empirical evidence, interpretation, and avenues for further research. Handbook of research on entrepreneurship and regional development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 58–106Google Scholar
  125. Fritsch M, Falck O (2007) New business formation by industry over space and time: a multidimensional analysis. Reg Stud 41(2):157–172Google Scholar
  126. Fritsch M, Mueller P (2004) Effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Reg Stud 38(8):961–975Google Scholar
  127. Fritsch M, Mueller P (2007) The persistence of regional new business formation-activity over time-assessing the potential of policy promotion programs. J Evolut Econ 17(3):299–315Google Scholar
  128. Fritsch M, Mueller P (2008) The effect of new business formation on regional development over time: the case of Germany. Small Bus Econ 30(1):15–29Google Scholar
  129. Fritsch M, Wyrwich M (2013) The long persistence of regional entrepreneurship culture: Germany 1925–2005, dIW Berlin discussion paperGoogle Scholar
  130. Gabe T (2003) Local industry agglomeration and new business activity. Growth Change 34(1):17–39Google Scholar
  131. Gabe T, Bell KP (2004) Tradeoffs between local taxes and government spending as determinants of business location*. J Reg Sci 44(1):21–41Google Scholar
  132. Garofoli G (1994) New firm formation and regional development: the Italian case. Reg Stud 28(4):381–393Google Scholar
  133. Georgellis Y, Wall HJ (2005) Gender differences in self-employment. Int Rev Appl Econ 19(3):321–342Google Scholar
  134. Geroski PA (1995) What do we know about entry? Int J Ind Organ 13(4):421–440Google Scholar
  135. Gimeno J, Folta T, Cooper A, Woo C (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Adm Sci Q 42(4):750–783Google Scholar
  136. Glaeser E, Kerr W, Ponzetto G (2010) Clusters of entrepreneurship. J Urban Econ 67(1):150–168Google Scholar
  137. Glaeser EL, Kerr W (2009) Local industrial conditions and entrepreneurship: How much of the spatial distribution can we explain? J Econ Manag Strateg 18(3):623–663Google Scholar
  138. Gompers P, Lerner J (2001) The venture capital revolution. J Econ Perspect 15(2):145–168Google Scholar
  139. Gordon P, Ikeda S (2011) Does density matter? In: Andersson D, Andersson E, Mellander C (eds) Handbook of creative cities. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  140. Greene WH (1994) Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in poisson and negative binomial regression models, NYU working paper no. EC-94-10Google Scholar
  141. Greene WH (2008) Econometric analysis, sixth (Pearson international) edition. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  142. Grek J, Karlsson C, Klaesson J (2011) Determinants of entry and exit: the significance of demand and supply conditions at the regional level. In: Kourtit K, Nijkamp P, Stough RS (eds) Drivers of innovation, entrepreneurship and regional dynamics. Springer, Berlin, pp 121–141Google Scholar
  143. Guesnier B (1994) Regional variations in new firm formation in France. Reg Stud 28(4):347–358Google Scholar
  144. Guimaraes O, Figueiredo P, Woodward D (2004) Industrial location modeling: extending the random utility framework. J Reg Sci 44(1):1–20Google Scholar
  145. Guimarães P, Figueiredo O, Woodward D (2003) A tractable approach to the firm location decision problem. Rev Econ Stat 85(1):201–204Google Scholar
  146. Hall DB (2004) Zero-inflated poisson and binomial regression with random effects: a case study. Biometrics 56(4):1030–1039Google Scholar
  147. Hall JC, Sobel RS (2008) Institutions, entrepreneurship, and regional differences in economic growth. Am J Entrep 1:69–96Google Scholar
  148. Haltiwanger JC, Jarmin RS, Miranda J (2010) Who creates jobs? Small vs. large vs. young. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  149. Hammer TH, Landau JC (1981) Methodological issues in the use of absence data. J Appl Psychol 66(5):574–581Google Scholar
  150. Hausman JA, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938Google Scholar
  151. Head CK, Ries JC, Swenson DL (1999) Attracting foreign manufacturing: investment promotion and agglomeration. Reg Sci Urban Econ 29(2):197–218Google Scholar
  152. Helfat CE, Lieberman MB (2002) The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history. Ind Corp Change 11(4):725–760Google Scholar
  153. Henrekson M (2005) Entrepreneurship: a weak link in the welfare state? Ind Corp Change 14(3):437–467Google Scholar
  154. Henrekson M, Johansson D (2010) Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Bus Econ 35(2):227–244Google Scholar
  155. Henrekson M, Sanandaji T (2014) Small business activity does not measure entrepreneurship. Proc Natl Acad Sci 5(111):1760–1765Google Scholar
  156. Holl A (2004a) Transport infrastructure, agglomeration economies, and firm birth: empirical evidence from Portugal. J Reg Sci 44(4):693–712Google Scholar
  157. Holl A (2004b) Start-ups and relocations: manufacturing plant location in Portugal. Pap Reg Sci 83(4):649–668Google Scholar
  158. Holl A (2004c) Manufacturing location and impacts of road transport infrastructure: empirical evidence from Spain. Reg Sci Urban Econ 34(3):341–363Google Scholar
  159. Holtz-Eakin D, Joulfaian D, Rosen HS (1994) Entrepreneurial decisions and liquidity constraints. RAND J Econ 25:334–347Google Scholar
  160. Ilmakunnas P, Kanniainen V (2001) Entrepreneurship, economic risks, and risk insurance in the welfare state: results with OECD data 1978–93. German Econ Rev 2(3):195–218Google Scholar
  161. Ilmakunnas P, Topi J (1999) Microeconomic and macroeconomic influences on entry and exit of firms. Rev Ind Organ 15(3):283–301Google Scholar
  162. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108(3):577–598Google Scholar
  163. Jofre-Monseny J, Sole-Olle A (2010) Tax differentials in intraregional firm location: evidence from new manufacturing establishments in Spanish municipalities. Reg Stud 44(6):663–677Google Scholar
  164. Jofre-Monseny J, Marin-Lopez R, Viladecans-Marsal E (2011) The mechanisms of agglomeration: Evidence from the effect of inter-industry relations on the location of new firms. Journal of Urban Economics 70(2):61–74Google Scholar
  165. Johnson P (2004) Differences in regional firm formation rates: a decomposition analysis. Entrep Theory Pract 28(5):431–445Google Scholar
  166. Johnson P, Parker S (1996) Spatial variations in the determinants and effects of firm births and deaths. Reg Stud 30(7):679–688Google Scholar
  167. Karazsia BT, van Dulmen MH (2008) Regression models for count data: illustrations using longitudinal predictors of childhood injury. J Pediatr Psychol 33(10):1076–1084Google Scholar
  168. Karlsson C, Nyström K (2011) Knowledge accessibility and new firm formation. New directions in regional economic development: the role of entrepreneurship theory and methods, practice and policy, p 174Google Scholar
  169. Keeble D, Walker S (1994) New firms, small firms and dead firms: spatial patterns and determinants in the United Kingdom. Reg Stud 28(4):411–427Google Scholar
  170. Kennedy PE (2003) A guide to econometrics. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  171. Khemani RS, Shapiro DM (1986) The determinants of new plant entry in Canada. Appl Econ 18(11):1243–1257Google Scholar
  172. Kihlstrom RE, Laffont JJ (1979) A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. J Polit Econ 87(4):719–748Google Scholar
  173. Kirchhoff BA, Newbert SL, Hasan I, Armington C (2007) The influence of University R&D expenditures on new business formations and employment growth. Entrep Theory Pract 31(4):543–559Google Scholar
  174. Klepper S (2001) Employee startups in high-tech industries. Ind Corp Change 10(3):639–674Google Scholar
  175. Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty, and profit. BeardBooks, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  176. Koo J, Cho K (2011) New firm formation and industry clusters: a case of the drugs industry in the US. Growth Change 42(2):179–199Google Scholar
  177. Kostova T (1997) Country institutional profiles: concept and measurement. Acad Manag Proc 1997:180–184Google Scholar
  178. Krueger NF, Reilly MD, Carsrud AL (2000) Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. J Bus Ventur 15(5):411–432Google Scholar
  179. Krugman P (1992) Geography and trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  180. La Porta R, Lopes-de Silanes F, Schleifer A (2008) The economic consequences of legal origins. J Econ Lit 46(2):285–332Google Scholar
  181. Lambert D (1992) Zero-inflated poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 34(1):1–14Google Scholar
  182. Le AT (1999) Empirical studies of self-employment. J Econ Surv 13(4):381–416Google Scholar
  183. Lee S, Florida R, Acs Z (2004) Creativity and entrepreneurship: a regional analysis of new firm formation. Reg Stud 38(8):879–891Google Scholar
  184. Lerner J, Tag J (2013) Institutions and venture capital. Ind Corp Change 22(1):153–182Google Scholar
  185. Lewis WA (1954) Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manch Sch 22(2):139–191Google Scholar
  186. Lindh T, Ohlsson H (1996) Self-employment and windfall gains: Evidence from the swedish lottery. Econ J 106(439):1515–1526Google Scholar
  187. List JA (2001) Us county-level determinants of inbound fdi: evidence from a two-step modified count data model. Int J Ind Organ 19(6):953–973Google Scholar
  188. List JA, McHone WW (2000) Measuring the effects of air quality regulations on ‘dirty’ firm births: evidence from the neo-and mature-regulatory periods. Pap Reg Sci 79(2):177–190Google Scholar
  189. Long JE (1982) The income tax and self-employment. Natl Tax J 35:31–42Google Scholar
  190. Long JS (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables, vol 7. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  191. Long SJ, Freese J (2006) Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata. StataCorp LP, College StationGoogle Scholar
  192. Love JH (1995) The measurement of entry rates: recondiseration and resolution. Empirica 22(2):151–157Google Scholar
  193. Lucas RE Jr (1978) On the size distribution of business firms. Bell J Econ 9:508–523Google Scholar
  194. Mai Y, Gan Z (2007) Entrepreneurial opportunities, capacities and entrepreneurial environments: evidence from chinese gem data. Chin Manag Stud 1(4):216–224Google Scholar
  195. Manjón-Antolín MC, Arauzo-Carod JM (2011) Locations and relocations: determinants, modelling, and interrelations. Ann Reg Sci 47(1):131–146Google Scholar
  196. Mansfield E (1962) Entry, gibrat’s law, innovation, and the growth of firms. Am Econ Rev 52(5):1023–1051Google Scholar
  197. Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics, 8th edn. McMillan and Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  198. Mata J, Portugal P, Guimaraes P (1995) The survival of new plants: start-up conditions and post-entry evolution. Int J Ind Organ 13(4):459–481Google Scholar
  199. McCloskey DN (2010) Bourgeois dignity: why economics can’t explain the modern world. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  200. McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  201. Metcalfe JS (2009) On marshallian evolutionary dynamics, entry and exit. In: Economic theory and economic thought: essays in honour of Ian Steedman, vol 107, p 350Google Scholar
  202. Meyer BD (1990) Why are there so few black entrepreneurs? Technical report, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  203. Moran PA (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37(1–2):17–23Google Scholar
  204. Mota I, Brandão A (2011) The determinants of location choice: single plants versus multi-plants. Pap Reg Sci 92(1):31–49Google Scholar
  205. Mullahy J (1986) Specification and testing of some modified count data models. J Econ 33(3):341–365Google Scholar
  206. Mullahy J (1997) Heterogeneity, excess zeros, and the structure of count data models. J Appl Econ 12(3):337–350Google Scholar
  207. Nakosteen RA, Zimmer MA (1987) Determinants of regional migration by manufacturing firms. Econ Inq 25(2):351–362Google Scholar
  208. Nightingale P, Coad A (2014) Muppets and gazelles: political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research. Ind Corp Change 23(1):113–143Google Scholar
  209. North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  210. Nyström K (2006) Entry and exit in swedish industrial sectors. Ph.D. thesis, University of SkövdeGoogle Scholar
  211. Nyström K (2007) An industry disaggregated analysis of the determinants of regional entry and exit. Ann Reg Sci 41(4):877–896Google Scholar
  212. Nyström K (2008) Regional institutional environment and Swedish regional new firm formation, CESIS. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  213. OECD (2001) Businesses views on red tape administrative and regulatory burdens on small and medium sizes enterprises. Technical report, OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  214. OECD (2003) The sources of economic growth in OECD countriesGoogle Scholar
  215. Orr D (1974) The determinants of entry: a study of the canadian manufacturing industries. Rev Econ Stat 56(1):58–66Google Scholar
  216. Ovaska T, Sobel R (2005) Entrepreneurship in post-socialist economies. J Priv Enterp 21(1):8–28Google Scholar
  217. Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2008) Networks and institutions. In: The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, pp 596–623Google Scholar
  218. Papke LE (1991) Interstate business tax differentials and new firm location: evidence from panel data. J Pub Econ 45(1):47–68Google Scholar
  219. Parker SC (1996) A time series model of self-employment under uncertainty. Economica 63:459–475Google Scholar
  220. Pellenbarg P, van Wissen LJ, van Dijk J (2002) Firm migration. In: McCann P (ed) Industrial location economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 110–148Google Scholar
  221. Pigou AC (1924) The economics of welfare. Transaction Publishers, PiscatawayGoogle Scholar
  222. Reynolds P (1994) Autonomous firm dynamics and economic growth in the united states, 1986–1990. Reg Stud 28(4):429–442Google Scholar
  223. Reynolds P, Storey D, Westhead P (1994) Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates: an editorial overview. Reg Stud J Reg Stud Assoc 28(4):343–346Google Scholar
  224. Reynolds PD, Camp SM, Bygrave WD, Autio E, Hay M (2002) Global entrepreneurship monitor gem 2001 summary report. London Business School and Babson College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  225. Robinson C, O’Leary B, Rincon A (2006) Business start-ups, closures and economic churn: a review of the literature. Enterprise Directorate, BERR, UKGoogle Scholar
  226. Robson MT (1998) The rise in self-employment amongst UK males. Small Bus Econ 10(3):199–212Google Scholar
  227. Robson MT, Wren C (1999) Marginal and average tax rates and the incentive for self-employment. South Econ J 65(4):757–773Google Scholar
  228. Santarelli E, Vivarelli M (2002) Is subsidizing entry an optimal policy? Ind Corp Change 11(1):39–52Google Scholar
  229. Santarelli E, Vivarelli M (2007) Entrepreneurship and the process of firms’ entry, survival and growth. Ind Corp Change 16(3):455–488Google Scholar
  230. Santarelli E, Carree M, Verheul I (2009) Unemployment and firm entry and exit: an update on a controversial relationship. Reg Stud 43(8):1061–1073Google Scholar
  231. Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  232. Schumpeter JA (1939) Business cycles: a theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  233. Schumpeter JA (1943) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  234. Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organiz Sci 11(4):448–469Google Scholar
  235. Siegfried JJ, Evans LB (1994) Empirical studies of entry and exit: a survey of the evidence. Rev Ind Organ 9(2):121–155Google Scholar
  236. Sinn HW (1996) Social insurance, incentives and risk taking. Int Tax Pub Finance 3(3):259–280Google Scholar
  237. Skedinger P (2008) Effekter av anställningsskydd: vad säger forskningen? SNS förlagGoogle Scholar
  238. Skedinger P (2012) Tudelad trygget. Jobben Kommer och Går-Behovet av Trygghet Består, Ekerlids förlag: StockholmGoogle Scholar
  239. Sobel R (2008) Testing baumol: institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur 23(6):641–655Google Scholar
  240. Sørensen PB (2010) Swedish tax policy: recent trends and future challenges. Finansdepartementet, RegeringskanslietGoogle Scholar
  241. Stam E (2007) Why butterflies don’t leave: locational behavior of entrepreneurial firms. Econ Geogr 83(1):27–50Google Scholar
  242. Stam E, Suddle K, Hessels J, van Stel A (2009) High-growth entrepreneurs, public policies and economic growth. In: Leitao J, Baptista R (eds) Public policies for fostering entrepreneurship: a European perspective. Springer, New York, pp 91–110Google Scholar
  243. Stenholm P (2011) Innovative behavior as a moderator of growth intentions. J Small Bus Manag 49(2):233–251Google Scholar
  244. Stenholm P, Acs ZJ, Wuebker R (2013) Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. J Bus Ventur 28(1):176–193Google Scholar
  245. Stenkula M (2012) Taxation and entrepreneurship in a welfare state. Small Bus Econ 39(1):1–21Google Scholar
  246. Stenkula M, Johansson D, Du Rietz G (2014) Marginal taxation of labor income in Sweden from 1862 to 2010. Scand Econ History Rev 62(2):163–187Google Scholar
  247. Stigler GJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 2:3–21Google Scholar
  248. Storey DJ (1994) Understanding the small business sector. Thomson Learning Emea, LondonGoogle Scholar
  249. Strotmann H (2007) Entrepreneurial survival. Small Bus Econ 28(1):87–104Google Scholar
  250. Sutaria V, Hicks DA (2004) New firm formation: dynamics and determinants. Ann Reg Sci 38(2):241–262Google Scholar
  251. Sutton J (1991) Sunk costs and market structure: price competition, advertising, and the evolution of concentration. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  252. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Osterlind SJ (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  253. Tullock G (1967) The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Econ Inq 5(3):224–232Google Scholar
  254. Van Praag CM, Cramer JS (2001) The roots of entrepreneurship and labour demand: Individual ability and low risk aversion. Economica 68:45–62Google Scholar
  255. Van Praag CM, Versloot PH (2007) What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Bus Econ 29(4):351–382Google Scholar
  256. Van Stel A, Carree M, Thurik R (2005) The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Bus Econ 24(3):311–321Google Scholar
  257. Veciana JM, Urbano D (2008) The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research. Introduction. Int Entrep Manag J 4(4):365–379Google Scholar
  258. Vejsiu A (2011) Incentives to self-employment decision in Sweden. Int Rev Appl Econ 25(4):379–403Google Scholar
  259. Van de Ven AH (1993) The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur 8(3):211–230Google Scholar
  260. Verheul I, Wennekers S, Audretsch DB, Thurik R (2002) An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: policies, institutions and culture. In: Audretsch DB, Thurik R, Verheul I, Wennekers S (eds) Entrepreneurship: determinants and policy in a European-U.S. comparison. Kluwer, Norwell, MA, pp 11–82Google Scholar
  261. Vivarelli M (2013) Is entrepreneurship necessarily good? Microeconomic evidence from developed and developing countries. Ind Corp Change 22(6):1453–1495Google Scholar
  262. Vuong QH (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econ J Econ Soc 57:307–333Google Scholar
  263. Wagner J (1994) The post-entry performance of new small firms in German manufacturing industries. J Ind Econ 42(2):141–154Google Scholar
  264. Wagner J, Sternberg R (2002) The role of the regional milieu for the decision to start a new firm: empirical evidence for Germany. Technical report, IZA Discussion paper series 494. Bonn: IZAGoogle Scholar
  265. Wennekers S, Thurik R (1999) Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Bus Econ 13(1):27–56Google Scholar
  266. Westlund H, Bolton R (2003) Local social capital and entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 21(2):77–113Google Scholar
  267. Westlund H, Andersson M, Karlsson C (2013) Creativity as an integral element of social capital and its role for economic performance. CESIS electronic working paper series no. 330Google Scholar
  268. Winkelmann R, Zimmermann KF (1995) Recent developments in count data modelling: theory and application. J Econ Surv 9(1):1–24Google Scholar
  269. Wong PK, Ho YP, Autio E (2005) Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: evidence from gem data. Small Bus Econ 24(3):335–350Google Scholar
  270. Yip GS (1982) Barriers to entry: a corporate strategy perspective. D. C. Heath, LexingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Ratio InstituteStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations