Advertisement

The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 917–924 | Cite as

A brief history of time, space, and growth: Waldo Tobler’s first law of geography revisited

WRSA presidential address 2013
  • Hans Westlund
Original Paper

Abstract

In the current knowledge economy, the most important production factor, human knowledge, is much more mobile than the dominating production factors of previous periods. This means that theories of spatial development, formulated during the manufacturing-industrial era, might not be wholly applicable today. One of the basic assumptions of spatial theory is formulated in Waldo Tobler’s first law of geography: “everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related than distant things.” This article discusses the validity of this law in today’s knowledge economy. While several factors have made distance less important, a crucial factor for innovation and growth—tacit knowledge—is still highly dependent on face-to-face contacts. This suggests that Waldo Tobler’s first law of geography plays an important role also in the knowledge economy.

JEL Classification

F00 O10 O30 N00 R11 D83 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for valuable comments from Waldo Tobler and Editor Janet Kolhase. All possible remaining flaws are the sole responsibility of the author.

References

  1. Andersson ÅE (1986) The four logistical revolutions. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 69:1–12Google Scholar
  2. Barnes TJ (2004) A paper related to everything but more related to local things. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94(2):278–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christaller W (1933) Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Gustav Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  4. Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Friedman T (2005) The world is flat: a brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodchild MF (2004) The validity and usefulness of laws in geographic information science and geography. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94(2):300–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hägerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science? Pap Reg Sci Assoc 24(1):6–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hawking S (1988) A brief history of time: from the big bang to black holes. Bantam Dell Publishing Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Innis HA (1956) Essays in Canadian economic history. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  10. Johansson B, Quigley J (2003) Agglomeration and networks in spatial economies. Pap Reg Sci 83(1): 165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leydesdorff L, Wagner C, Park HW, Adams J (2013) International collaboration in science: the global map and the network, El Profesional de la Información (in press)Google Scholar
  12. Lösch A (1940) Die räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft. Gustav Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  13. Malmberg A, Maskell P (2002) Localised capabilities and industrial competitiveness. In: Öhman J, Simonsen K (eds) Voices from the north: new trends on nordic human geography. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 11–28Google Scholar
  14. Marshall A (1880) Principles of economics: an introductory volume. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller HJ (2004) Tobler’s first law and spatial analysis. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94(2):284–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mok D, Wellman B, Carrasco J (2010) Does distance matter in the age of the internet? Urban Stud 47(13):2747–2783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. North DC (1955) Location theory and regional economic growth. J Polit Econ 63:243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Phillips JD (2004) Doing justice to the law. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94(2):290–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  22. Pred AR (1965) Industrialization, initial advantage, and American metropolitan growth. Geogr Rev 55: 158–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith JM (2004) Unlawful relations and verbal inflation. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94(2):294–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sui D (2004) Tobler’s first law of geography: a big idea for a small world? Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94(2): 269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tobler W (1970) A computer movie simulating growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46:234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tobler W (2004) On the first law of geography: a reply. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94(2):304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weber M (1904/1905) Die protestantische Ethik und der “Geist” des Kapitalismus. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 20:1–54 and 21:1–110 (English translation): The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (trans: Talcott Parsons), 1931/2001. Routledge Classics, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Westlund H (2006) Social capital in the knowledge economy: theory and empirics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. Williamson O (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Urban and Regional StudiesKTH (Royal Institute of Technology)StockholmSweden
  2. 2.Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden
  3. 3.IRSA (Institute for Developmental and Strategic Analyses)LjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations