The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 861–883

Natural amenities and their effects on migration along the urban–rural continuum

Original Paper

Abstract

The importance of natural amenities in promoting development and population change has been addressed in a large body of literature with recent studies identifying rather obvious spatial heterogeneity in the effects of natural amenities on migration. This said, the potential variation along the urban–rural continuum has not been addressed empirically. In this study, we examine and compare the migration effects of natural amenities in five specific urban–rural continuum types at the minor civil division level in the US state of Wisconsin. Results of spatial analysis suggest that natural amenities do indeed have differing effects on migration along this urban–rural continuum. Overall, natural amenities have the largest effect on in-migration into rural areas adjacent to metro areas and no effect on in-migration into urban areas. The effects of natural amenities on in-migration into remote rural areas rely more on growth trends within these regions. These findings have important implications for rural development, land use policy, and natural resource management.

JEL Classification

R11 R14 R15 R23 

References

  1. Ali K, Partridge M, Olfert M (2007) Can geographically weighted regressions improve regional analysis and policy making? Int Reg Sci Rev 30:300–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsden B, Stedman R, Kruger L (2011) The creation and maintenance of sense of place in a tourism-dependent community. Leis Sci 33:32–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin L (1988) Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geogr Anal 20:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anselin L (1990) Spatial dependence and spatial structural instability in applied regression Analysis. J Reg Sci 30:185–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anselin L (2005) Exploring spatial data with GeoDa\(^{\rm TM}\): a workbook. Spatial Analysis Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  6. Balk D (2009) More than a name: why is global urban population mapping a GRUMPy proposition? In: Gamba P, Herold M (eds) Global mapping of human settlement: experiences, data sets, and prospects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 145–161Google Scholar
  7. Baller R, Richardson K (2002) Social integration, imitation, and the geographic patterning of suicide. Am Sociol Rev 67:873–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowe S, Marcouiller D (2007) Natural resources and the tourism-timber tradeoff: issues of regional dependency and economic diversity. For Policy Econ 9:653–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown D, Fuguitt G, Heaton T, Waseem S (1997) Continuities in size of place preferences in the United States, 1972–1992. Rural Sociol 62:408–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chi G (2010a) Land developability: developing an index of land use and development for population research. J Maps 2010:609–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chi G (2010b) The impacts of highway expansion on population change: an integrated spatial approach. Rural Sociol 75:58–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chi G, Marcouiller D (2009a) Rethinking the migration effect of natural amenities: Part I. Can J Reg Sci 32:331–348Google Scholar
  13. Chi G, Marcouiller D (2009b) Rethinking the migration effect of natural amenities: Part II. Can J Reg Sci 32:349–360Google Scholar
  14. Chi G, Marcouiller D (2011) Isolating the effect of natural amenities on population change at the local level. Reg Stud 45:491–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark D, Hunter W (1992) The impact of economic opportunity, amenities and fiscal factors on age-specific migration rates. J Reg Sci 32:349–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deller S, Tsai T, Marcouiller D, English D (2001) The role of amenities and quality-of-life in rural economic growth. Am J Agric Econ 83:352–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duffy-Deno K (1998) The effect of federal wilderness on county growth in the intermountain western. J Reg Sci 38:109–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fallah B, Partridge M, Olfert M (2010) Urban sprawl and productivity: evidence from US metropolitan areas. Pap Reg Sci 90:451–472Google Scholar
  19. Fuguitt G, Brown D, Beale C (1989) Rural and small town America. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Glaeser E (1997) Are cities dying? J Econ Perspect 12:139–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gosnell H, Abrams J (2009) Amenity migration: diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal 76:303–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graves P (1979) A life-cycle empirical analysis of migration and climate by race. J Urban Econ 6:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graves P (1980) Migration and climate. J Reg Sci 20:227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graves P (1983) Migration with a composite amenity. J Reg Sci 23:541–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graves P, Linneman P (1979) Household migration: theoretical and empirical results. J Urban Econ 6:383–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Irwin M, Kasarda J (1991) Air passenger linkages and employment growth in U.S. metropolitan areas. Am Sociol Rev 56:524–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Isserman A (2001) The competitive advantages of rural America in the next century. Int Reg Sci Rev 24:35–58Google Scholar
  28. Isserman A, Feser E, Warren D (2009) Why some rural places prosper and others do not. Int Reg Sci Rev 32:300–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson K, Beale C (1994) The recent revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan areas of the United States. Rural Sociol 59:655–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim K, Marcouiller D, Deller S (2005) Natural amenities and rural development: understanding spatial and distributional attributes. Growth Change 36:275–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knapp T, Graves P (1989) On the role of amenities in models of migration and regional development. J Reg Sci 29:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kruger L, Selin S, Thompson K (2008) Amenity migration, affinity to place, serious leisure and resilience. In: Moss L, Glorioso R, Krause A (eds) Understanding and managing amenity-led migration in mountain regions. The Banff Center, Banff-AltaGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewis D, Hunt G, Plantinga A (2002) Public conservation land and employment growth in the northern forest region. Land Econ 78:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marcouiller D (1998) Environmental resources as latent primary factors of production in tourism: the case of forest-based commercial recreation. Tour Econ 4:131–145Google Scholar
  35. McGranahan D (2008) Landscape influence on recent rural migration in the U.S. Landsc Urban Plan 85:228–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Partridge M (2010) The duelling models: NEG vs amenity migration in explaining US engines of growth. Pap Reg Sci 89:513–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Partridge M, Rickman D, Ali K, Olfert M (2008a) The geographic diversity of U.S. nonmetropolitan growth dynamics: A geographically weighted regression approach. Land Econ 84:241–266Google Scholar
  38. Partridge M, Rickman D, Ali K, Olfert M (2008b) Lost in space: population dynamics in the American hinterlands and small cities. J Econ Geogr 8:727–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patton M, McErlean S (2003) Spatial effects within the agricultural land market in northern Ireland. J Agric Econ 54:35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pinkse J, Slade M (2010) The future of spatial econometrics. J Reg Sci 50:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rappaport J (2007) Moving to nice weather. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37:375–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rasker R, Hansen A (2000) Natural amenities and population growth in the greater Yellowstone region. Human Ecol Rev 7:30–40Google Scholar
  43. Rasker R, Gude P, Gude J, van den Noort J (2009) The economic importance of air travel in high-amenity rural areas. J Rural Stud 25:343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roback J (1982) Wages, rents, and the quality of life. J Political Econ 90:1257–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robbins P, Meehan K, Gosnell H, Gilbertz S (2009) Writing the new west: a critical review. Rural Sociol 74:356–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rupasingha A, Goetz S (2004) County amenities and net migration. Agric Resour Econ Rev 33:245–254Google Scholar
  47. Schmidt L, Courant P (2006) Sometimes close is good enough: the value of nearby environmental amenities. J Reg Sci 46:931–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson E, Hammond G, Weiler S (2006) Amenities, local conditions, and fiscal determinants of factor growth in rural America. Kansas City, MO: RWP 06–08 Federal Reserve BankGoogle Scholar
  49. Tiebout C (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Political Econ 64:416–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. US Census Bureau (2004) Geographic areas reference manual. Available from: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/garm.html. Accessed 15 March 2011
  51. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2003) Metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas. OMB Bulletin No. 03–04. U.S. OMB, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  52. USDA ERS (2004) Measuring rurality: rural–urban continuum codes. Economic Research Service, USDA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  53. Woods M (2010) Rural. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu J (2010) Economic fundamentals and urban-suburban disparities. J Reg Sci 50:570–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu J, Gopinath M (2008) What causes spatial variations in economic development in the United States? Am J Agric Econ 90:392–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zipf G (1946) The P\(_{1}\)P\(_{2}/\)D hypothesis: on the intercity movement of persons. Am Sociol Rev 11:677–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social Science Research CenterMississippi State UniversityStarkvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Urban and Regional PlanningUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations