Education and the location of work: a continued economic role for central cities?
Using data on individuals from the 2008 American Community Survey, we examine the relationship between educational attainment and the location of jobs in fifteen large metropolitan areas in the United States. We focus on whether individuals with higher educational attainment tend to work in the central city versus the suburbs, and we do so taking into account the residential location of households (central city vs suburb). We show that central cities tend to be the work site of more highly educated workers—those with a bachelor’s degree and above. Workers with less than a high school degree also tend to work in the city. Taking account of the residential location preferences of highly educated workers mildly diminishes the direct effect of higher education on city job location, but it does not negate it. In contrast, central city job opportunities for workers with less than a high school education are not so abundant; these workers tend to work in the city mostly because they also live there.
KeywordsEducation Location Work Cities
JEL ClassificationD19 I20 R12
We would like to thank Dan McMillen, the editor, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on a preliminary draft. A preliminary version of the paper was presented at the 2011 Western Regional Science Association’s Annual Meeting in Kauai.
- Alonso W (1964) Location and land use. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Anas A, Arnott R, Small K (1998) Urban spatial structure. J Econ Lit 36:1426–1464Google Scholar
- Carlino G, Chatterjee S, Hunt R (2006) Urban density and the rate of invention. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 06–14Google Scholar
- Florida R (2006) The flight of the creative class. Harper-Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Florida R (2008) Who’s your city? Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Fu S, Ross SL Wage premia in employment clusters: agglomeration economies or worker heterogeneity. J Labor Econ (2013, forthcoming)Google Scholar
- Glaeser EL, Kahn ME (2001) Decentralized employment and the transformation of the American city. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2Google Scholar
- Glaeser EL, Kolko J, Saiz A (2001) Consumer City. J Econ Geogr 50:1–27Google Scholar
- Istrate E, Puentes R, Tomer A (2012) Commuting in the state of Metropolitan American. Brookings, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Kain JF (2003) A pioneer’s perspective on the spatial mismatch literature. Paper presented at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s spatial mismatch conferenceGoogle Scholar
- McMillen D (2012) Personal communicationGoogle Scholar
- Mills E (1967) An aggregate model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. Am Econ Rev 57:197–210Google Scholar
- Muth RF (1969) Cities and housing. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- United States Department of Commerce (2010) Statistical abstract of the United States. United States Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Wheaton W (1977) Income and urban residence: an analysis of consumer demand for location. Am Econ Rev 67:620–631Google Scholar