Advertisement

The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 555–575 | Cite as

Economic growth in Brazil: a spatial filtering approach

  • Túlio Antonio Cravo
  • Guilherme Mendes Resende
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper examines the importance of space to per capita GDP growth in Brazil for the period 1980–2004 at the micro-regional level. The role of space is investigated by applying a spatial filter that eliminates the spatial dependence of the data and allows comparison with the original data. The conditioning variables become insignificant after removing spatial dependence. This suggests that the statistical significance of the growth determinants is intrinsically linked to geographical location and indicates the importance of space to regional growth in Brazil. Moreover, these results show that the convergence process is different across spatial regimes after removing this dependence.

JEL Classification

C23 R11 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abreu M, de Groot HLF, Florax RJGM (2005) Space and growth: a survey of empirical evidence and methods. Région et Développement 21: 13–44Google Scholar
  2. Andrade E, Laurini M, Madalozzo R, Pereira P (2004) Convergence clubs among Brazilian municipalities. Econ Lett 83: 179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr Anal 27: 93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anselin L, Bera AK, Florax R, Yoon MJ (1996) Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26(1): 77–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anselin L, Hudak S (1992) Spatial econometrics in practice: a review of software options. Reg Sci Urban Econ 22(3): 509–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arbia G, Le Gallo J, Piras G (2008) Does evidence on regional economic convergence depend on the estimation strategy? Outcomes from analysis of a set of NUTS2 EU regions. Spat Econ Anal 3: 209–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arbia G, Battisti M, Di Vaio G (2010) Institutions and geography: empirical test of spatial growth models for european regions. Econ Model 27: 12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arellano M (2003) Panel data econometrics (Advanced Texts in Econometrics). Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58: 277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Azariadis C, Drazen A (1990) Threshold externalities in economic development. Q J Econ 105: 501–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Azzoni CR (2001) Economic growth and regional income inequality in Brazil. Ann Reg Sci 35: 133–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Badinger H, Müller WG, Tondl G (2004) Regional convergence in the European Union, 1985–1999: a spatial dynamic panel analysis. Reg Stud 38(3): 241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barro R (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J Econ 106: 407–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barro R, Mankiw G, Sala-I-Martin X (1995) Capital mobility in neoclassical models of growth. Am Econ Rev 85(1): 103–115Google Scholar
  16. Battisti M, Di Vaio G (2008) A spatially filtered mixture of β-convergence regressions for EU regions, 1980–2002. Empir Econ 34(1): 105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87: 111–143Google Scholar
  18. Burridge P (1980) On the Cliff–Ord test for spatial autocorrelation. J R Stat Soc B 42: 107–108Google Scholar
  19. Caselli F, Esquivel G, Lefort F (1996) Reopening the convergence debate. J Econ Growth 1(3): 363–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chow GC (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28(3): 591–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coelho RLP, Figueiredo L (2007) Uma análise da hipótese da convergência para os municípios Brasileiros. Rev Bras Econ 61: 331–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cravo TA (2010) SMEs and economic growth in the Brazilian micro-regions. Pap Reg Sci 89: 711–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Durlauf SN, Johnson PA (1995) Multiple regimes in cross-country growth behavior. J Appl Econ 10(4): 365–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Durlauf SN, Johnson PA, Temple JRW (2005) Growth Econometrics. In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Elservier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  25. Elhorst JP (2010) Spatial panel data models. In: Fischer M, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. Elhorst JP, Piras G, Arbia G (2010) Growth and convergence in a multiregional model with space—time dynamics. Geogr Anal 42: 338–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ertur C, Le Gallo J, Baumont C (2006) The European regional convergence process, 1980–1995: do spatial regimes and spatial dependence matter?. Int Reg Sci Rev 29: 3–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferreira A (2000) Convergence in Brazil: recent trends and long-run prospects. Appl Econ 32: 479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferstl R (2007) Spatial filtering with EViews and MATLAB. Austrian J Stat 36(1): 17–26Google Scholar
  30. Fingleton B (2000) Spatial econometrics, economic geography, dynamics and equilibrium: a ‘third way’?. Environ Plan A 32: 1481–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Getis A, Griffith DA (2002) Comparative spatial filtering in regression analysis. Geogr Anal 34(2): 130–140Google Scholar
  32. Getis A, Ord JK (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24: 189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glaeser E, Sacerdote B, Scheinkman J (2003) The social multiplier. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(2–3): 345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Islam N (1995) Growth empirics: a panel data approach. Q J Econ 110(4): 1127–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Islam N (2003) What have we learnt from the convergence debate?. J Econ Surv 17: 309–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laurini M (2007) A note on the use of quantile regression in beta convergence analysis. Econ Bull 3(52): 1–8Google Scholar
  37. Laurini M, Andrade E, Valls P (2005) Income convergence clubs for Brazilian municipalities: a non-parametric analysis. Appl Econ 37(18): 2099–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lesage JP, Fischer MM (2008) Spatial growth regressions: model specification, estimation and interpretation. Spat Econ Anal 3(3): 275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lesage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107: 407–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maza A, Villaverde J (2009) Spatial effects on provincial cconvergence and income distribution in Spain: 1985–2003. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 100(3): 316–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mohl P, Hagen T (2010) Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches. Reg Sci Urban Econ 40(5): 353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mossi MB, Aroca P, Fernández IJ, Azzoni CR (2003) Growth dynamics and space in Brazil. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(3): 393–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ord JK, Getis A (1995) Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geogr Anal 27: 286–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Quah D (1996) Empirics for economic growth and convergence. Eur Econ Rev 40: 1353–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Quah D (1997) Empirics for growth and distribution: stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. J Econ Growth 2: 27–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramajo J, Márquez MA, Hewings GJD, Salinas MM (2008) Spatial heterogeneity and interregional spillovers in the European Union: do cohesion policies encourage convergence across regions?. Eur Econ Rev 52(3): 551–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rauch J (1993) Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: evidence from the cities. J Urban Econ 34(3): 380–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Resende G (2011) Multiple dimensions of regional economic growth: the Brazilian case, 1991–2000. Pap Reg Sci 90: 629–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rey S, Montouri B (1999) US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective. Reg Stud 33: 143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roodman D (2009) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in stata. Stata J 9(1): 86–136Google Scholar
  52. Sala-i-Martin X (1996) The classical approach to convergence analysis. Econ J 106: 1019–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Silveira-Neto R, Azzoni CR (2006) Location and regional income disparity dynamics: the Brazilian case. Pap Reg Sci 85(4): 599–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Temple J (1999) The new growth evidence. J Econ Lit 37: 112–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Túlio Antonio Cravo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guilherme Mendes Resende
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Inter-American Development BankWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsLoughborough UniversityLeicestershireUK
  3. 3.Department of Geography and EnvironmentLondon School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)LondonUK
  4. 4.Institute of Applied Economic Research/Government of Brazil (IPEA)BrasiliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations