Zipf’s and Gibrat’s laws for migrations
This paper analyses the evolution of the size distribution of the stock of immigrants in the period 1960–2000. In particular, we are interested in testing the validity of two empirical regularities: Zipf’s law, which postulates that the product between the rank and size of a population is constant; and Gibrat’s law, according to which the growth rate of a variable is independent of its initial size. We use parametric and nonparametric methods and apply them to absolute (stock of immigrants) and relative (migration density, defined as the quotient between the stock of immigrants of a country and its total population) measurements. We find that both the stock of immigrants and migration density follow similar size distributions to those of cities and of countries. Contrary to what traditional migrations models predict, growth in the stock of immigrants is independent of the initial stock. Moreover, the growth of migration density shows a divergent behaviour, which could be explained by the lower birth rates of host countries and the reduction in the cost of emigration produced by the presence of a previous stock of immigrants in the country.
JEL ClassificationJ61 R11 R12
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Carrington WJ, Detragiache E, Vishwanath F (1996) Migration with endogenous moving cost. Am Econ Rev 86: 909–930Google Scholar
- Cox N, Salgado-Ugarte I, Shimizu M, Toru Taniuchi T (1999) KERNREG2: Stata module to compute kernel regression (Nadaraya–Watson). http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/k/kernreg2.ado
- Gabaix X, Ioannides YM (2004) The evolution of city size distributions. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of urban and regional economics, vol. 4. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 2341–2378Google Scholar
- Gibrat R (1931) Les inégalités économiques. Librairie du Recueil Sirey, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez-Val R, Sanso-Navarro M (2009) Gibrat’s law for countries. J Popul Econ (forthcoming). doi:10.1007s00148-009-0246-7
- Härdle W (1990) Applied nonparametric regression, econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Harris JR, Todaro MP (1970) Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. Am Econ Rev 60: 126–142Google Scholar
- Jenkins SP, Van Kerm P (2007) PARETOFIT: stata module to fit a type 1 Pareto distribution. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456832.html
- Pareto V (1896) Cours d’economie politique. Droz, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- United Nations (2004) Trends in total migrant stock: the 2003 revision. Database maintained by The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social AffairsGoogle Scholar
- Zipf G (1949) Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley, CambridgeGoogle Scholar