Advertisement

The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 379–396 | Cite as

The home market effect in the Spanish industry, 1965–1995

  • Nuria Domeque Claver
  • Carmen Fillat Castejón
  • Fernando Sanz Gracia
Original Paper

Abstract

This study was intended to identify empirically the existence of the home market effect (HME) in Spanish manufacturing industry, a case which shows some incipient evidence in very early stages of development, and an increasing relevance of this phenomenon over time. Our empirical test is carried out with 17 regions between 1965 and 1995, and lends support to the hypothesis of the existence of the HME in five of the nine industries analysed. These results are obtained using a specification in line with the traditional one but new in the sense that it is defined in proportions instead of levels; this approach has conceptual advantages because it is a relative one, like the definition of HME itself.

JEL Classification

R12 R30 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin RE, Okubo T (2004) Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: selection and sorting. CEPR Discussion Paper 4602Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin RE, Robert-Nicoud F (2005) Trade and growth with heterogenous firms. CEPR Discussion Paper 4965Google Scholar
  3. Behrens K, Lamorgese AR, Ottaviano GIP, Tabuchi T (2004) Testing the home-market effect in a multi-country world. CEPR Discussion Paper 4468 and CORE Discussion Paper 2005/55Google Scholar
  4. Behrens K, Thisse JF (2005) Regional inequality and product variety. Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques. Working paper 2005013Google Scholar
  5. Conniffe D (1993) Logistic transformation of the budget share in engel curves and demand functions. Econ Social Rev 25(1): 49–56Google Scholar
  6. Crozet M (2004) Do migrants follow market potentials? an estimation of a new economic geography model. J Econ Geogr 4: 439–458Google Scholar
  7. Crozet M, Trionfetti F (2005) Trade costs and non-linear home market effect, paper presented at the European Trade Study Group (ETSG, Dublín, September)Google Scholar
  8. Crozet M, Trionfetti F (2007) Trade costs and the home market effect. CEPII Working paper No 5Google Scholar
  9. Davis DR (1998) The home market effect, trade, and industrial structure. Am Econ Rev 88: 1264–1276Google Scholar
  10. Davis DR, Weinstein DE (1996) Does economic geography matter for international specialization? Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Paper 1773Google Scholar
  11. Davis DR, Weinstein DE (1999) Economic geography and regional production structure: an empirical investigation. Eur Econ Rev 43(2): 379–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis DR, Weinstein DE (2003) Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: an empirical test. J Int Econ 59(1): 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fundación BBVA (1999) Renta Nacional de España y su distribución provincial. Serie homogénea. Años 1955 a 1993 y avances 1994 a 1997, 2 vols., BilbaoGoogle Scholar
  14. Fundación BBVA (2000) Renta Nacional de España y su distribución provincial. Año 1995 y avances 1996–1999, BilbaoGoogle Scholar
  15. Fundación BBVA (2002) El stock de capital en españa y su distribución territorial (1964–2000). Matilde Mas Ivars, Francisco Pérez García y Ezequiel Uriel Jiménez. BilbaoGoogle Scholar
  16. García Pirés AJ (2006) Estimating Krugman’s economic geography model for the Spanish regions. Spanish Econ Rev 8(2): 83–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geary RC (1954) The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. Incorp Stat 5: 115–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greene WH (2003) Econometric analysis. Pearson, Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanson GH, Xiang C (2004) The home market effect and bilateral trade patterns. Am Econ Rev 94: 1108–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanson GH (2005) Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration. J Int Econ 67(1): 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hausman JA (1976) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46: 1251–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Head K, Mayer T (2004) The empirics of agglomeration and trade. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  23. Head K, Ries J (2001) Increasing returns versus national product differentiation as an expanation for the pattern of U.S.-Canada trade. Am Econ Rev 91(4): 858–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (several years). Anuario Estadístico de España. Varias ediciones. Años 1965 a 1995, MadridGoogle Scholar
  25. Krugman P (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. Am Econ Rev 70(5): 950–959Google Scholar
  26. Leamer E (1984) Sources of international comparative advantage: theory and evidence. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Melitz M (2003) The impact of trade on intraindustry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71: 1695–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moran PAP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37: 17–23Google Scholar
  29. Okubo T, Rebeyrol V (2006) Home market effect and regulation costs—homogeneous firm and heterogeneous firm trade models. HEI Working Papers 02-2006Google Scholar
  30. Ottaviano G, Thisse JF (2004) Agglomeration and economic geography. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Paluzie E, Pons J, Tirado DA (2001) Regional integration and specialization patterns in Spain. Reg Stud 35(4): 285–296Google Scholar
  32. Paluzie E, Pons J, Silvestre J, Tirado DA (2007) Testing the new economic geography: migrations and industrial agglomerations in Spain. J Reg Sci 47(2): 289–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Redding S, Venables A (2004) Economic geography and international inequality. J Int Econ 62: 53–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosés JR (2003) Why isn’t the whole of spain industrialized? New economic geography and early industrialization, 1787–1910. J Econ History 63(4): 995–1022Google Scholar
  35. Schumacher D, Siliverstovs B (2006) Home-market and factor-endowment effects in a gravity approach. Rev World Econ 142(2): 330–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trionfetti F (2001) Using home-biased demand to test trade theories. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 137(3): 404–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weder R (1995) Linking absolute and comparative advantage to intra-industry trade theory. Rev Int Econ 3(3): 342–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuria Domeque Claver
    • 1
  • Carmen Fillat Castejón
    • 2
  • Fernando Sanz Gracia
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Structure and Economic History and Public EconomyUniversity of ZaragozaHuescaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Structure and Economic History and Public EconomyUniversity of ZaragozaZaragozaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Economic AnalysisUniversity of ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations