Cultural diversity and entrepreneurship: a regional analysis for Germany
- 4k Downloads
In this paper, we investigate the determinants of entrepreneurial activity in a cross section of German regions for the period 1998–2005. Departing from the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, the focus of our analysis is on the role of the regional environment and, in particular, knowledge and cultural diversity. Our main hypothesis is that both, knowledge and diversity, have a positive impact on new firm formation. As the determinants of regional firm birth rates might differ considerably with respect to the necessary technology and knowledge input, we consider start-ups at different technology levels. The regression results indicate that regions with a high level of knowledge provide more opportunities for entrepreneurship than other regions. Moreover, while sectoral diversity tends to dampen new firm foundation, cultural diversity has a positive impact on technology oriented start-ups. This suggests that the diversity of people is more conducive to entrepreneurship than the diversity of firms. Thus, regions characterized by a high level of knowledge and cultural diversity form an ideal breeding ground for technology oriented start-ups.
JEL ClassificationM13 O18 R11
We would like to thank participants of the international workshop on “Agglomeration and Growth in Knowledge-based Societies” at the Kiel Institute for helpful comments on an earlier version. We are particularly grateful to Rui Baptista, Eckhardt Bode and two anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Acs Z, Audretsch D, Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B (2004) The missing link: the knowledge filter and endogenous growth, Discussion paper. Center for Business and Policy Studies, StockholmGoogle Scholar
- Acs Z, Audretsch D, Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B (2005) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. CEPR Discussion Paper 5326, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Aiginger K, Davis S (2004) Industrial specialisation and geographic concentration: two sides of the same coin? Not for the European Union. J Appl Econ 8(2): 231–248Google Scholar
- Arrow K (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 609–626Google Scholar
- Audretsch DB, Feldmann M (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86: 630–640Google Scholar
- Audretsch DB, Stephan P (1996) Company-scientist locational links: the case of biotechnology. Am Econ Rev 86: 641–652Google Scholar
- BBR (Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung) (2001) Aktuelle Daten zur Entwicklung der Städte, Kreise und Gemeinden. Berichte. Band 8: BonnGoogle Scholar
- Cowell F (2005) Theil inequality indices and decomposition. ECINEQ Working Paper 2005-1, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Hoover E (1937) Location theory and the shoe and leather industries. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jaffe A (1989) The real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79: 957–970Google Scholar
- Metzger G, Heger D (2005), Die Bereitstellung von Standardauswertungen zum Gründungsgeschehen in Deutschland und Österreich für externe Datennutzer, Version 2005-02, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), MannheimGoogle Scholar
- Porter M (1990) The comparative advantage of nations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Steil F (1999) Determinanten regionaler Unterschiede in der Gründungsdynamik. Baden-Baden: NomosGoogle Scholar