Advertisement

The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 251–265 | Cite as

The geographical effects of the NAFTA on Canadian provinces

  • Martin A. Andresen
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) on the Canadian provinces. A large body of research has emerged testing the effects of the Canada–US Free Trade Agreement and the NAFTA, but the majority of that research has analyzed the effect of free trade at the national scale despite the fact that different provinces have different industrial compositions and levels of integration with the US. It is found that there is a geographical component to the effect of the NAFTA, and this geographical component varies from province to province.

JEL Classification

F130 F140 F150 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson JE (1979). A theoretical foundation of the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69(1): 106–116 Google Scholar
  2. Anderson JE and Wincoop E (2003). Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93(1): 170–192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin JR and Brown WM (2004). Regional manufacturing employment volatility in Canada: the effects of specialisation and trade. Papers Region Sci 83(3): 519–541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergstrand JH (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev Econ Stat 67(3): 474–481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergstrand JH (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Rev Econ Stat 71(1): 143–153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Britton JNH (2002). Regional implications of North American integration: a Canadian perspective on high technology manufacturing. Region Stud 36(4): 359–374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Britton JNH (2002b) Free trade and the high-technology response: a regional innovation system perspective on Toronto. In: Holbrook JA, Wolfe DA (eds) Knowledge, clusters and regional innovation: economic development in Canada. McGill-Queen’s University Press, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown WM and Anderson WP (1999). The influence of industrial and spatial structure on Canada–US regional trade. Growth Change 30(1): 23–47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Centre for the Study of Living Standards (2005) NAICS based Capital, labour and total factor productivity tables by province for Canada. http://www.csls.ca/data/ptabln.asp. Accessed: 21 July 2005
  10. Cheng I-H and Wall HJ (2005). Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Federal Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev 87(1): 49–63 Google Scholar
  11. Contenta S (1996) Economist says world priorities misplaced. The Toronto Star, June 13Google Scholar
  12. Coughlin CC and Wall HJ (2003). NAFTA and the changing pattern of state exports. Papers Region Sci 82: 427–450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coulombe S (2004) International trade diversion, the Canada–United States free trade agreement and the L curve. Topics Econ Anal Policy 4, Article 16Google Scholar
  14. Courchene TJ (2003). FTA at 15, NAFTA at 10: a Canadian perspective on North American integration. N Am J Econ Finan 14: 263–285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deardorff AV (1998). Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world?. In: Frankel, JA (eds) The regionalization of the world economy, pp 7–32. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
  16. External Affairs Canada (1987) The Canada–US free trade agreement: tariff schedule of Canada. External Affairs Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  17. Feenstra RC (2002). Border effects and the gravity equation: consistent methods for estimation. Scottish J Polit Econ 49(5): 491–506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frankel J, Stein E and Wei S (1995). Trading blocs and the Americas: the natural, the unnatural, and the super-natural. J Dev Econ 47(1): 61–95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gould DM (1998) Has NAFTA changed North American trade? Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Econ Rev 1st Quarter:12–23Google Scholar
  20. Greene WH (2000). Econometric Analysis,. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River Google Scholar
  21. Halvorsen R and Palmquist R (1980). The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am Econ Rev 70(3): 474–475 Google Scholar
  22. Helliwell JF (1996). Do national borders matter for Quebec’s trade?. Can J Econ 29(3): 507–522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helpman E and Krugman PR (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: increasing returns, imperfect Competition and the international economy. The MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  24. Hoare AG (1993). Domestic regions, overseas nations and their interactions through trade: the case of the United Kingdom. Environ Plan A 25: 701–722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hummels D and Levinsohn J (1995). Monopolistic competition and international trade: reconsidering the evidence. Quar J Econ 110(3): 799–836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kennedy PE (1981). Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am Econ Rev 71(4): 802 Google Scholar
  27. Krueger AO (1999) Trade creation and trade diversion under NAFTA. NBER Working Paper 7429. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Linneman H (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows. Amsterdam, North Holland Google Scholar
  29. McCallum J (1995). National borders matter: Canada–US regional trade patterns. Am Econ Rev 85: 615–623 Google Scholar
  30. Pöyhönen P (1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 90(1): 93–99 Google Scholar
  31. Romalis J (2005) NAFTA’s and CUSFTA’s impact on international trade. NBER Working Paper 11059. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Statistics Canada (1992) 1991 census of agriculture. Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  33. Statistics Canada (1986) Census of agriculture, 1986. Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  34. Statistics Canada (1998) Interprovincial trade in Canada, 1984–1996. Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  35. Statistics Canada (1999) 1996 census of agriculture. Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  36. Statistics Canada (2000) Interprovincial and international trade in Canada, 1992–1998. Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  37. Statistics Canada (2002) 2001 census of agriculture. Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  38. Statistics Canada (2004) Canadian international trade, 1988–2003. International Trade Division, Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  39. Statistics Canada’s (2005a) Canadian socio-economic information management System (CANSIM). Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  40. Statistics Canada (2005b) Census of agriculture, 1981. Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  41. Tinbergen J (1962). Shaping the world economy. The Twentieth Century Fund, New York Google Scholar
  42. United States Department of Agriculture (2000) Summary report: 1997 natural resources inventory (revised December 2000). Natural Resources Conservation Service Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Wall HJ (2000) Gravity model specification and the effects of the Canada–US border. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series: Working Paper 2000-024AGoogle Scholar
  44. Wall HJ (2003). NAFTA and the geography of North American trade. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Rev March/April 2003: 13–26 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of CriminologySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations