The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 681–703 | Cite as

Regional policy from a supra-regional perspective

  • Ugo Fratesi
Original Paper


The issue of the interplay between the two objectives of equity and efficiency for national policy-makers in charge of regional policy is becoming topical once again in regional economics. This paper first reviews this issue theoretically and looks at recent literature contributions to show that, although many advances have been made, little attention has been paid to the effects of regional structural differences on the trade-off between the two objectives. Then, to demonstrate that differences between the regions of which a country is composed may influence the results of the models, a new simple short-run two-country four-region model is introduced to study the trade-off (differentiating for different regional productivity and different strengths of agglomeration economies—which are innovatively modelled on the demand side). In this short-term model, the national policy-maker can affect entrepreneurship through the set-up costs of firms. Similarly to the traditional literature, for countries composed of identical regions, spatially dispersed allocations of public support to production are more efficient with low agglomeration economies whereas spatially concentrated allocations are more efficient with high agglomeration economies. As the regions become different, however, unbalanced allocations of public support to the most advanced region become more efficient even in the case of relatively weak agglomeration economies, until, when regions are sufficiently different, the most efficient allocation of public support to production is always concentrated in the most advanced territories. If some sort of compensating mechanisms were available, in the short-run the policy-makers could decide to support the competitiveness of the already more-productive regions and transfer income to the lagging ones. All these issues are studied with reference to southern Italy (“Mezzogiorno”) and eastern Germany (former DDR) in order to show not only the similarities with the model’s predictions but also the many differences, resulting from the far greater complexity of actual development processes.

JEL Classification

R13 R58 H79 E61 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akerlof GA, Rose AK, Yellen JL, Hessenius H, Dornbusch R, Guitian M (1991) East Germany in from the cold: the economic aftermath of currency union. Brookings Pap Econ Activ (1):1–105Google Scholar
  2. Alesina A, Danninger S, Rostagno MV (1999) Redistribution through public employment: The case of Italy. NBER Working Paper (7387)Google Scholar
  3. Andersson R (2005). The efficiency of Swedish regional policy. Ann Reg Sci 39: 811–832 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aquino A (2006). Mezzogiorno: Perché?. L’Industria 27(1): 15–40 Google Scholar
  5. Attanasio O, Padoa Schioppa Kostoris F (1991) Regional inequalities, migration and mismatch in Italy, 1960–1986. In: Attanasio O, Padoa F, Schioppa Kostoris (eds) Mismatch and Labour mobility. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldwin RE (2001) The core-periphery model with forward looking expectations. Reg Sci Urban Econ (31):21–49Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin R, Martin P and Ottaviano GIP (2001). Global income divergence, trade, and industrialization: the geograohy of growth take-offs. J Econ Growth 6: 5–37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldwin RE, Forslid R, Martin P, Ottaviano G and Robert-Nicoud F (2003). Economic Geography Public Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton Google Scholar
  9. Behrens K (2004). Agglomeration without trade: how non traded goods shape the space-economy. J Urban Econ 55: 68–92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Behrens K, Gaigné C, Ottaviano GIP, Thisse JF (2003) Interregional and international trade: seventy years after ohlin. CEPR Discussion Papers (4065)Google Scholar
  11. Berliant M and ben Raa T (2004). Increasing returns and perfect competition: the role of land. J Urban Econ 56: 97–118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boltho A, Carlin W, Scaramozzino P (1997) Will east Germany become a new Mezzogiorno? J Comp Econ (24):241–264Google Scholar
  13. Brunello G, Lippi C, Ordine P (2001) Widening difference in internal regional unemployment. Labour Econ 8Google Scholar
  14. Burda MC (2006). Factor reallocation in eastern Germany after reunification. Am Econ Rev 96(2): 368–374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burda MC and Hunt J (2001). From reunification to economic integration: productivity and the labor market in eastern germany. Brookings Pap Econ Activ 2001(2): 1–71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chenery H (1962). Development policies for southern Italy. Q J Econ 76: 515–547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Confindustria (2000) La dotazione infrastrutturale delle province italiane. Confindustria, RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. Crozet M and Koenig Soubeyran P (2004). Eu enlargement and the internal geography of countries. J Comp Econ 32: 265–279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davies S, Hallet M (2002) Interactions between national and regional development. HWWA Discussion Paper (207)Google Scholar
  20. Dixit AK and Stiglitz JE (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67(3): 297–308 Google Scholar
  21. Dunford M (2002). Italian regional evolutions. Environ Plann A 34: 657–694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dupont V (2007). Do geographical agglomeration, growth and equity conflict?. Pap Reg Sci 86(2): 193–213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dupont V, Martin P (2003) Subsidies to poor regions and inequalities: some unpleasant arithmetic. CEPR Discussion Papers (3620)Google Scholar
  24. EU Commission (2004) A new partnership for cohesion: convergence competitiveness cooperation. Third report on economic and social cohesionGoogle Scholar
  25. Ezcurra R and Rapun M (2006). Regional disparities and national development revisited. Eur Urban Reg Stud 13(4): 355–369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fratesi U and Riggi MR (2007). Does migration reduce regional disparities? The role of skill-selective flows. Rev Urban Reg Develop Stud 19(1): 78–102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fujita M and Thisse JF (2002). Economics of agglomeration; cities, industrial location and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, London Google Scholar
  28. Fujita M, Krugman P and Venables P (1999). The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  29. Funke M and Rahn J (2001). How efficient is eastern Germany?. Econ Transit 10(1): 201–223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giesek A (2006). Prospettive per il processo di convergenza della germania est. L’Industria 27(1): 45–47 Google Scholar
  31. Grossman GM and Helpman E (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Rev Econ Stud 58(1): 43–61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guerrieri P and Iammarino S (2006). The rise of ‘many mezzogiorni’: an empirical assessment of the internal differentiation of Italian southern regions. Eur Urban Reg Stud 13(2): 167–178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hallet M (2000) Regional specialisation and concentration in the EU. Economic Papers, European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (No. 141)Google Scholar
  34. Hallett AJH and Ma Y (1993). East Germany, west Germany and their Mezzogiorno problem: A parable for European economic integration. Econ J 103(417): 416–428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Higgins B (1988) Regional development and efficiency of the national economy. In: Higgins B, Savoie DJ (eds) Regional economic develoopment, essays in honour of Francois Perroux. Unwin Hyman, pp 193–224Google Scholar
  36. Hurst C, Thisse J-F and Vanhoudt P (2000). What diagnosis for Europe’s ailing regions. EIB Papers 5(1): 9–30 Google Scholar
  37. Kanbur R and Rapoport H (2005). Migration selectivity and the evolution of spatial inequality. J Econ Geogr 5(1): 43–57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krugman P (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3): 483–499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lanaspa LF and Sanz F (1999). Regional policy and industrial location decisions. Urban Stud 36(3): 499–507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lanaspa LF and Sanz F (2001). Multiple equilibria, stability and asymmetries in Krugman’s core-periphery model. Pap Reg Sci 80: 425–438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lanaspa LF and Sanz F (2004). Regional policy and industrial location decisions. Investigaciones Econ 28(1): 67–87 Google Scholar
  42. Lanaspa LF, Pueyo F and Sanz F (2001). The public sector and the core-periphery model. Urban Stud 38(10): 1639–1649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leach J (1996). Training, migration and regional income disparities. J Pub Econ 61: 429–443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lombardini S (1992) Vecchi e nuovi problemi al sud. In: D’Antonio M (ed) Il Mezzogiorno d’Italia: sviluppo o stagnazione? Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  45. Markusen A (1996). Interaction between regional and industrial policies: evidence from four countries. Int Reg Sci Rev 19(1–2): 49–77 Google Scholar
  46. Martin P (1998a). Can regional policies affect growth and geography in Europe?. World Econ 21: 757–774 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin R (1998b) The new ‘geographical turn’ in economics: some critical reflections. Cam J EconGoogle Scholar
  48. Martin P (1999a). Are european regional policies delivering. EIB Papers 4(2): 10–23 Google Scholar
  49. Martin P (1999b). Public policies, regional inequalities and growth. J Pub Econ 73(1): 85–105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Martin P and Ottaviano GIP (1999). Growing locations: industry location in a model of endogenous growth. Europ Econ Rev 43: 281–302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Martin P and Rogers CA (1995). Industrial location and public infrastructure. J Int Econ 39(3–4): 152–166 Google Scholar
  52. Monfort P and Nicolini R (2000). Regional convergence and international integration. J Urban Econ 48: 286–306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Murata Y (2003). Product diversity, taste heteroeneity and geographic distribution of economic activities: market vs non-market interactions. J Urban Econ 53: 126–144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ottaviano GIP (2001). Monopolistic competition, trade and endogenous spatial fluctuations. Reg Sci Urban Econ 31: 51–77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ottaviano GIP and Thisse J-F (2002). Integration, agglomeration and the political economics of factor mobility. J Pub Econ 83: 429–456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ottaviano GIP, Thisse J-F (2003) Agglomeration and economic geography. CEPR Discussion Papers (3838)Google Scholar
  57. Ottaviano GIP, Tabuchi T and Thisse J-F (2002). Agglomeration and trade revisited. Int Econ Rev 43(2): 409–435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Paluzie E (2001). Trade policy and regional inequality. Pap Reg Sci 80: 67–85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Puga D (2002). European regional policies in light of recent location theories. J Econ Geog 2(4): 373–406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Richardson HW (1979). Regional economics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana Google Scholar
  61. Sinn H-W (2001) Germany’s economic unification: an assessment after 10 years. NBER Working paper (7586)Google Scholar
  62. Sinn H-W, Westermann F (2001) Two mezzogiornos. NBER Working Paper (8125)Google Scholar
  63. Solow RM (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1): 65–94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Starrett D (1978). Market allocations of locational choice in a model with free mobility. J Econ Theory 17: 21–37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Taylor J and Wren C (1997). UK regional policy: an evaluation. Reg Stud 31(9): 835–848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thisse J-F (2000). Agglomeration and regional imbalance: why? And is it bad. EIB Papers 5(2): 47–67 Google Scholar
  67. Trigilia C (1992). Sviluppo senza autonomia. Il Mulino, Bologna Google Scholar
  68. Vanhove N (1999) Regional policy: a European approach. AshgateGoogle Scholar
  69. Williamson JG (1965). Regional inequality and the process of national development: a description of patterns. Econ Develop Cult Change 13: 3–45 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations